Overview
Title
To require the Election Assistance Commission to develop voluntary guidelines for the administration of elections that address the use and risks of artificial intelligence technologies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like asking a team to make a list of helpful tips on how to use computers smartly and safely during elections, but they have to share this list pretty quickly with everyone.
Summary AI
S. 3897 aims to have the Election Assistance Commission develop voluntary guidelines for how elections should be managed concerning the use and potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Within 60 days of the bill's enactment, the Commission, in cooperation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, must submit these guidelines to Congress, election offices, and the public. The guidelines will address the advantages and disadvantages of using AI in election processes, cybersecurity threats posed by AI, the impact of AI on sharing accurate election information, and strategies to combat election disinformation influenced by AI that might harm public trust.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Preparing Election Administrators for AI Act" is a legislative proposal introduced in the United States Senate. The primary aim of the bill is to task the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), in collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, with developing voluntary guidelines. These guidelines are intended to help election offices navigate the use and risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in election administration.
General Summary of the Bill
This legislation mandates that the EAC create a report with voluntary guidelines addressing several critical areas concerning AI in elections. Specifically, the bill calls for guidelines that evaluate the risks and benefits of using AI in election processes, the cybersecurity implications, the impact on the dissemination of accurate election information, and the potential for AI to propagate disinformation that could erode public trust in the electoral process. The guidelines are meant to be advisory and targeted at state and local election offices, with a deadline of 60 days from the bill's enactment to deliver the report to Congress and the public.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill encounters several notable issues:
Budgetary Concerns: There is no specification of budget or spending limits for the creation and dissemination of these guidelines. This lack of financial boundaries could potentially lead to uncontrolled or ineffectual expenditure.
Stringent Timeline: A 60-day timeframe to draft and release these comprehensive guidelines appears ambitious, possibly leading to hasty and ineffective results.
Enforcement Ambiguity: While the guidelines are labeled as voluntary, the absence of clear enforcement or implementation mechanisms could result in uneven adoption across different jurisdictions.
Resource Support: There is a lack of clarity regarding what resources or support will be provided to state and local election offices for adopting these guidelines effectively.
Guideline Updates: The bill does not address the frequency or process for reviewing and updating the guidelines in response to advancements in AI technologies, risking obsolescence.
Public Accessibility: It is not clear how the guidelines will be made publicly available in a way that ensures wide accessibility and dissemination.
Potential Impacts on the Public
Broadly, the bill is aimed at safeguarding elections from possible AI-related risks like cybersecurity threats and disinformation. If effectively implemented, these guidelines could bolster public confidence in the integrity of elections, addressing potential discrepancies and misinformation that can arise from AI technologies.
However, if the aforementioned issues are not addressed, there could be inconsistent implementation and a lack of uniformity in election practices across different states. This inconsistency may lead to varied voter experiences and perceptions of the election process's reliability.
Potential Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Election Administrators: For election officials, these guidelines could serve as important tools to navigate the rapidly evolving technological landscape. However, the lack of clarity on resources and enforcement could leave them without sufficient support or pressure to adopt best practices.
Technological Stakeholders: Companies and entities involved in deploying AI technologies in election contexts may face increased scrutiny and expectations. This bill could push them to enhance the transparency and reliability of their systems to align with the proposed guidelines.
The General Public: Voters stand to benefit from stronger election systems that have adapted robust cybersecurity and misinformation safeguards. Nevertheless, the public may remain skeptical if the guidelines are not uniformly applied or if they are perceived as inadequate.
By addressing the outlined issues, the proposed legislation has the potential to positively influence the functioning and perception of election administrations nationwide. However, this requires carefully navigating complexities of implementation, budget, and technological adaptation.
Issues
The section on voluntary guidelines does not specify any budget or spending limits, raising concerns about the potential for open-ended or wasteful spending in their development and dissemination. (Section 2)
The timeline of 60 days for the Election Assistance Commission to submit a report and issue guidelines is stringent and risks leading to rushed and possibly inadequate guidelines. (Section 2)
The language regarding the voluntary guidelines is ambiguous as it does not clarify any enforcement mechanisms that will apply, potentially leading to inconsistent adoption across different jurisdictions. (Section 2)
There is a lack of specificity about the resources and support available to State and local election offices for effectively implementing the guidelines. (Section 2)
The guidelines' review and update process to accommodate new advancements in AI technologies is not addressed, which could lead to outdated or irrelevant guidelines. (Section 2)
It is unclear how the public availability of the guidelines will be ensured, raising concerns about their accessibility and dissemination across different platforms for maximum reach. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states its short title, which is “Preparing Election Administrators for AI Act”.
2. Voluntary guidelines for administration of elections that address the use and risks of artificial intelligence technologies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that the Election Assistance Commission, in collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, must produce a report with voluntary guidelines within 60 days of the Act's enactment. These guidelines are intended for election offices and focus on the use and risks of artificial intelligence in elections, covering topics such as potential risks and benefits, cybersecurity threats, the impact on spreading accurate information, and the dangers of spreading disinformation that could undermine public trust.