Overview
Title
To prohibit the granting or renewing of security clearances to a person who has expressed support for a foreign terrorist organization, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or any affiliate of such Corps, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that if someone has said nice things about certain bad groups, they can't get a special secret pass. It also wants to check every now and then that people who are giving out these passes are being careful to find out if someone likes these bad groups.
Summary AI
The bill S. 3894, introduced in the Senate, seeks to prohibit the granting or renewing of security clearances for individuals who have expressed support for foreign terrorist organizations or groups like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its affiliates, including Hamas and Hezbollah. It amends existing law to include public support expressions as a disqualifying factor for security clearances. Additionally, the bill mandates periodic audits every two years to ensure federal agencies effectively assess clearance applicants for these criteria, with a report to Congress on the agency's measures to detect such support.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
This legislative proposal, titled the “No Clearances for Terrorist Sympathizers Act of 2024,” aims to modify existing laws related to the granting and renewal of security clearances within the United States. Introduced in the Senate by Mr. Cotton on March 7, 2024, the bill seeks to prevent anyone who has shown support for specific foreign terrorist organizations, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Hamas, Hezbollah, or any affiliates, from obtaining or renewing a security clearance. The bill also mandates audits of the clearance process to ensure compliance with this prohibition.
Significant Issues
One of the primary issues identified in this bill is the ambiguity surrounding the language used to describe what constitutes "support" or "ties" to these groups. Without specific definitions or criteria, the interpretation of these terms could vary, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement and legal challenges.
Another area of concern is the lack of guidance on what actions to take should a federal agency fail to effectively screen applicants for security clearances under these new criteria. The absence of specified consequences or corrective measures could reduce the accountability of these agencies.
Furthermore, the bill calls for periodic audits of the security clearance process no less frequently than every two years. While oversight is important, such frequent audits could result in redundant spending if the clearance processes remain largely unchanged, thus wasting government resources.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The bill is designed to enhance national security by ensuring that those who may pose a risk due to their expressed support for foreign terrorist organizations do not have access to sensitive information. Broadly, this could lead to an increase in public trust regarding the security of national secrets and administered processes.
For federal agencies responsible for the granting and renewal of security clearances, the bill imposes additional operational requirements. Agencies will need to adjust their screening processes to ensure compliance, potentially requiring increased resources for compliance auditing.
Individuals applying for security clearances might experience more meticulous background checks, and those with past expressions of support—however defined—for the specified organizations could face denials of clearance. This may pose issues related to fairness and transparency if the criteria for what constitutes “support” are not clearly outlined and standardized across agencies.
In summary, while the intent of this legislation aligns with bolstering national security, careful consideration and clarification of its terms and processes are crucial to prevent unintended negative consequences. By addressing ambiguities and accountability measures, the bill could be more effective and equitable in its implementation.
Issues
The term 'has ties to or supports the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or any affiliate of such Corps, including Hamas and Hezbollah' in Section 2 could be ambiguous, leading to varied interpretations and potential legal challenges regarding what constitutes 'ties' or 'support.'
Section 2 lacks clear guidelines or criteria for determining when someone has 'publicly expressed support' for a designated foreign terrorist organization, which could result in inconsistent application and accusations of bias or unfair treatment.
The requirement for periodic audits 'not less frequently than once every two years' by the Inspector General in Section 2 could lead to redundant spending and inefficient use of government resources if audits are unnecessarily frequent.
The audit requirements in Section 2 do not specify what specific aspects of the security clearance process need to be examined, leading to potential gaps in oversight or failure to address significant issues.
Section 2 does not specify actions to be taken if a Federal agency does not effectively determine whether an applicant has expressed support for a terrorist organization, potentially limiting accountability or corrective measures.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states its official name, which is the "No Clearances for Terrorist Sympathizers Act of 2024."
2. Prohibition on granting or renewing security clearances to persons who have publicly expressed support for a foreign terrorist organization, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or any affiliate of such Corps Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law to ensure that anyone who has publicly supported foreign terrorist organizations or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps cannot receive or renew a security clearance. It also requires regular audits to check if federal agencies follow this rule effectively.