Overview
Title
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require the promulgation of cybersecurity and digital service regulations relating to the use of EBT cards under the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure the special cards people use to buy food are really safe from hacking, just like how having a lock on the front door keeps a house safe. It also wants to help people easily get new cards if theirs are lost or broken, and make sure that small stores can still use these cards without spending too much money on new machines.
Summary AI
S. 3893, titled the "Enhanced Cybersecurity for SNAP Act of 2024," seeks to update the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to improve the security of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards used in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill requires new regulations to ensure SNAP EBT cards meet modern cybersecurity standards and are chip-enabled. It also mandates that states implement better user interfaces for managing benefits, such as mobile-friendly options that allow users to track and manage their transactions. Additionally, it outlines steps to provide quick replacement of lost or compromised cards and prohibits fees for such replacements if certain conditions are met.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled "Enhanced Cybersecurity for SNAP Act of 2024," aims to bolster the cybersecurity and digital service regulations for the use of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). It seeks to introduce a range of cybersecurity measures, including upgrading EBT cards to chip-enabled technology to prevent fraud, enhancing user interfaces, and ensuring timely transaction alerts. The bill also mandates that retailers use chip-enabled payment terminals to participate in SNAP and sets forth a structure for replacing lost or damaged EBT cards promptly. Furthermore, it includes measures to assist low-access grocery areas.
General Summary of the Bill
This bill intends to bring the EBT card system to a higher security standard in line with industry norms and federal guidelines by requiring chip-enabled cards and enhancing user interaction platforms. In addition, it introduces specific rules for states on how quickly they must replace cards when affected by damage, loss, or fraud, and it prohibits states from charging fees for such replacements under certain conditions.
Significant Issues
A few significant issues arise from the bill's implementation:
State Financial and Logistical Burden: The requirement for all states to upgrade to chip-enabled EBT cards and eliminate magnetic stripe cards poses a considerable financial and logistical challenge. States might face budgetary concerns in implementing these changes without federal funding assistance.
Retailer Compliance Costs: By requiring chip-enabled payment terminals, the bill imposes potentially high costs on SNAP-participating retailers, particularly small and rural businesses. Such businesses may struggle with the financial burden or fail to meet the 180-day compliance timeline.
Security Flexibility Limitations: The provision limiting PIN and password requirements to federal standards might undermine states' ability to implement cybersecurity measures tailored to specific local needs or threats.
Replacement Card Costs: States might face financial strain due to the prohibition on charging fees for certain card replacements if there is no reimbursement mechanism.
Complexity in Implementation: The detailed requirements for user interfaces could lead to confusion and compliance challenges for states, necessitating clarifications for successful implementation.
Impact on the Public
The bill could broadly impact the public by increasing the security of EBT transactions, protecting SNAP recipients from fraud, and enhancing user accessibility. This would likely improve the user experience and trust in the system, leading to greater ease of use and potentially increased participation in SNAP.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
SNAP Participants: For recipients, the transition to more secure and user-friendly EBT cards and interfaces could greatly enhance their experience by reducing the instance of fraud and providing better access to transaction information. However, there could be short-term disruptions as changes are implemented.
State Agencies: States might face financial and administrative challenges in meeting the bill’s requirements, particularly if federal reimbursement or support is not readily available. Implementing new technologies and systems could strain budgets and resources.
Retailers: The requirement for chip-enabled terminals could exclude smaller retailers unable to afford upgrades, thereby limiting options for SNAP users and potentially affecting revenue for these businesses.
Technology Vendors: On a positive note, vendors providing chip-enable technologies and secure payment solutions may see increased business as states and retailers work to comply with the new standards.
In conclusion, while the bill addresses important updates necessary for modern cybersecurity standards and enhanced user interfaces for EBT systems, it raises multiple issues regarding implementation feasibility, particularly concerning financial impacts on states and retailers.
Issues
The requirement for each State to upgrade to chip-enabled EBT cards and prohibit magnetic stripe cards may impose significant costs on States, potentially leading to budgetary or logistical challenges. This is detailed in Section 2 and could have widespread financial and operational implications for state agencies.
The mandate that states ensure a replacement EBT card is provided within 3 business days in case of damage, loss, or fraud (Section 3) does not consider possible logistical challenges across different states, which could lead to inefficiencies or increased administrative costs and delays for benefit recipients.
The requirement in Section 5 for retailers to use chip-enabled payment terminals as a condition of SNAP participation could impose financial burdens on small retailers and lead to their exclusion due to the high costs or inability to meet the short compliance timeline, particularly affecting small and rural businesses.
The prohibition on password and PIN complexity requirements deviating from NIST standards as stated in Section 2 may limit States' flexibility to implement security measures tailored to specific local threats or technological environments, potentially compromising their cybersecurity strategy.
The introduction of a grant program for upgrading to chip-compatible payment terminals as discussed in Section 2 might favor certain entities, particularly affecting those in areas with limited grocery access as determined by the Secretary, leading to unequal distribution of financial aid.
The amendment that states may not collect charges for EBT card replacements due to fraud or malfunction (Section 4) may lead to financial strain on state agencies if they are not reimbursed for these costs, and this could also lead to inconsistent applications between state agencies.
Complexity and potential compliance challenges arise from the detailed requirements in Section 2 for different user interfaces, possibly leading to difficulties for states in interpreting and effectively implementing the measures without further clarification.
The lack of specificity in how compliance with the mandate for chip-enabled payment terminals will be enforced (Section 5) could lead to uncertainties and inconsistent application of rules across states and different types of retail outlets.
Section 6 specifies a report to review EBT card security, but the lack of criteria for evaluating card resistance to cloning may lead to insufficient analysis, delaying necessary security improvements if vulnerabilities are discovered.
The requirement for states to collect and report data on user interface availability and cybersecurity measures (Section 2) might impose significant reporting burdens on states, which may not have adequate infrastructure for such detailed data collection.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be called the “Enhanced Cybersecurity for SNAP Act of 2024.”
2. Enhanced cybersecurity for EBT cards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines new cybersecurity requirements for Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards, mandating updates like chip-enabled technology to prevent fraud. It also introduces user-friendly interfaces for managing benefits, requires States to issue timely transaction alerts, and establishes a grant program to help retailers upgrade their payment systems for chip cards.
3. Ensuring no loss of access to benefits due to EBT card damage, loss, or fraud Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 requires states to replace damaged, lost, or fraud-affected EBT cards within three business days of a request. States must offer the option for in-person card collection but cannot mandate it.
4. No replacement fees for certain EBT cards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 specifies that state agencies cannot charge fees for replacing EBT cards if the replacement is due to card malfunction, suspected fraud by someone outside the cardholder's household, card expiration, or regulatory requirements, starting 60 days after the Enhanced Cybersecurity for SNAP Act of 2024 becomes law.
5. Requirement for retailer use of chip-enabled payment terminals as a condition of SNAP participation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment requires that retail food stores and wholesale food concerns must have chip-enabled payment terminals in order to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This must be implemented within 180 days after relevant regulations are finalized.
6. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Agriculture is required to deliver a report within one year about the security of EBT cards used in Puerto Rico. This report will cover how well these cards can resist being cloned and may offer suggestions for preventing fraud, with the possibility of including a classified section for sensitive information.
7. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The given section of the bill amends Section 501 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, by removing and reorganizing several parts. It simplifies the language used in certain subsections and removes specific references to streamline the text.