Overview

Title

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to update and expand Federal economic development investment in the economic recovery, resiliency, and competitiveness of communities, regions, and States across the United States, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to help towns and cities in America get better and stronger by giving them money to fix things like roads and job training. It's like giving them a big piggy bank to use for making their homes nice and safe, especially if bad things happen or if they need new jobs.

Summary AI

S. 3891 seeks to amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to enhance federal economic development investments in communities across the United States. The bill introduces new grants and programs aimed at improving infrastructure, workforce training, and resilience in the face of economic challenges and natural disasters. It also focuses on supporting distressed rural and urban areas, Tribal communities, and regions impacted by industry changes, aiming to boost job creation, innovation, and sustainability. Additionally, the bill calls for increased coordination among federal, state, and local entities to effectively manage resources and promote economic growth.

Published

2024-03-07
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-03-07
Package ID: BILLS-118s3891is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
61
Words:
21,541
Pages:
103
Sentences:
481

Language

Nouns: 6,143
Verbs: 1,447
Adjectives: 1,134
Adverbs: 112
Numbers: 1,162
Entities: 1,286

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.24
Average Sentence Length:
44.78
Token Entropy:
5.57
Readability (ARI):
24.12

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation for the Economic Development Reauthorization Act of 2024 aims to amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, focusing on enhancing economic development across communities, regions, and states in the U.S. The bill outlines various measures to bolster economic recovery, resiliency, and competitiveness, such as public infrastructure grants, workforce training, regional commission support, and initiatives for economic adjustment and development.

General Summary

At its core, the bill is designed to update and expand federal investments in economic development activities, supporting both rural and urban areas that face economic challenges. Key components include new grant programs, the establishment of regional commissions, and support for improving infrastructures such as broadband, renewable energy, and public works. The legislation also calls for increased coordination among federal agencies and emphasizes the need for comprehensive economic development strategies that consider environmental factors and resilience.

Significant Issues

Several notable issues arise from the bill. One challenge relates to the broad interpretations conveyed in various sections, such as the flexibility in funding allocations for waste management improvements and the expansion of eligible activities under renewable energy programs. This vagueness could potentially lead to misallocation of resources and ineffective project implementations. Moreover, the increase in federal financial involvement from 50% to 60% in the cost-sharing provision is a substantial amendment that raises concerns about federal spending without clear justification.

The establishment of the Office of Tribal Economic Development and the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience is significant, but both sections lack explicit budgetary details or oversight measures, which could lead to inefficiencies or unregulated spending. Furthermore, the bill introduces new reporting and notification requirements that, while enhancing transparency, involve a delay in public availability that may hinder timely oversight.

Public Impact

For the general public, the primary effect might be an increase in access to funding and resources aimed at improving community infrastructure, creating jobs, and enhancing economic resilience. If properly implemented, these measures have the potential to uplift economically distressed areas by promoting sustainable economic growth and revitalizing local economies.

However, the broad discretion provided in certain sections poses a risk of inequitable benefits distribution or prioritization of certain projects over others. The lack of defined criteria for funding allocation might result in some communities being underserved or misrepresented in grant decisions.

Stakeholder Impact

Local Communities: Communities facing high unemployment or economic distress could benefit from increased financial support and infrastructure improvements, while the flexibility in funding might lead to competition for resources among various communities, potentially leaving some with less benefit.

Tribal Governments: The Office of Tribal Economic Development intends to amplify focus on Tribal economic development, though insufficient budgeting and oversight details could result in uneven or inefficient support for Tribal entities.

Energy and Infrastructure Sectors: These sectors stand to gain from increased investment in public projects, including renewable energy developments and broadband expansion, thereby potentially leading to innovation and enhanced service delivery.

State Governments: The increased federal share in cost-sharing arrangements and grant allocations might provide states with greater resources to support local projects. However, states with limited resources might face challenges in leveraging grants that require a state financial contribution.

In conclusion, while the bill presents a comprehensive and ambitious plan for boosting economic development across the U.S., the broad language and lack of specific guidelines in certain areas may pose challenges in ensuring efficient and equitable implementation. Proper oversight and criteria clarity could significantly enhance its impact and effectiveness.

Financial Assessment

The bill S. 3891 introduces several financial provisions intended to strengthen federal support for economic development across the United States. The bill outlines various appropriations and spending strategies, aiming to boost infrastructure, workforce readiness, renewable energy, and overall community resilience.

Summary of Financial Allocations

Section 126 authorizes appropriations for several programs over the next five fiscal years. Key allocations include:

  • Grants for Public Works and Economic Development: Beginning at $170 million for fiscal year 2025 and increasing annually to $270 million by fiscal year 2029.

  • Grants for Planning and Administrative Expenses: Starting at $90 million in 2025, increasing to $130 million by 2029.

  • Grants for Training, Research, and Technical Assistance: From $25 million in 2025 to $45 million by 2029.

  • Grants for Economic Adjustment (excluding subsections for coal and nuclear host communities): Beginning at $65 million in 2025 and rising to $105 million by 2029.

  • Assistance to Coal Communities: $75 million annually over five years, reflecting increased focus on transitioning economies.

  • Workforce Training Grants: Consistently financed at $50 million per year, with $10 million specifically designated for subsection (c) activities each year.

Other notable appropriations include $5 million annually for the Renewable Energy Program, and the introduction of $20 million per year towards the Critical Supply Chain Site Development Grant Program.

Financial Allocations Related to Identified Issues

  1. Cost Sharing Adjustment (Section 106): The adjustment of federal share from 50% to 60% potentially escalates federal expenditure without an articulated justification. This raises concerns about long-term budget implications without detailed financial forecast statements explaining resource requirements.

  2. Denali Commission Reauthorization (Section 213): This provision significantly increases the appropriation from $15 million up to $35 million per year through 2029. The increase, not accompanied by a clear spending outline, poses risks of inefficiency and insufficient oversight, threatening optimal fund utilization.

  3. Renewable Energy Program Changes (Section 111): By broadening the focus from 'brightfields demonstration' to 'renewable energy', the scope is widened, which may dilute resources allocated under this provision. This broader definition risks diverting funds into too many initiatives without prioritizing areas where they could be most effective.

  4. New Programs Without Specified Caps (Sections 115 and 118): The ‘Critical Supply Chain Site Development Grant Program’ and 'Office of Tribal Economic Development' receive funding but lack detailed ceilings on grant amounts, potentially leading to disproportionate allocations or misaligned investments.

  5. Financial Implementation of Workforce Training Grants (Section 219): Funding of career scholarships limited to 70% of costs could pose barriers for states struggling to meet the remaining 30%, potentially hindering the program's effectiveness in states with less economic flexibility.

  6. General Discretion on Expenditure (Section 119): The latitude given to the Secretary to fund "appropriate" activities within the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience highlights potential risks. Without precise spending guidelines, there could be inconsistencies in fund allocation, with resources potentially diverted away from critical needs.

This bill, while aiming to address diverse community development challenges, could benefit from increased transparency and specificity in financial management to ensure resources are directed efficiently and align with the broader objectives of sustainable economic growth and equity.

Issues

  • The section on 'Grants for public works and economic development' potentially allows for broad interpretations of waste management and recycling systems, which could lead to spending on projects not strictly aligned with economic development (Section 104).

  • The amendment language on 'Cost sharing' increases the federal share from 50% to 60%, potentially leading to increased federal spending without clear justification, which could be significant from a financial perspective (Section 106).

  • The bill's 'Critical supply chain site development grant program' does not specify a maximum or range for grant amounts, which might lead to overly large or wasteful allocations (Section 115).

  • The 'Renewable energy program' section replaces 'brightfields demonstration' with 'renewable energy', making the language more general and potentially expanding the scope beyond what was originally intended, which could lead to resources being spread too thin and ineffective (Section 111).

  • The section on 'Office of Tribal Economic Development' lacks specific budgetary details or limits, potentially leading to wasteful spending without proper oversight (Section 118).

  • The 'Workforce training grants' section provides funding for career scholarships that do not exceed 70% of the total cost, potentially posing challenges for States with limited resources to cover the remaining portion (Section 219).

  • The lack of specificity in defining the 'blue economy' could lead to varying standards of sustainability and adverse environmental impacts (Section 102).

  • The 'Congressional notification requirements' describe a delay in public notification, allowing up to 60 days after notice to Congress, potentially hindering timely public oversight (Section 113).

  • The amendments related to the Denali Commission significantly increase authorized spending without a detailed breakdown of spending priorities, risking inefficiencies or lack of oversight (Section 213).

  • The section 'Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience' allows wide discretion to the Secretary in determining what activities are 'appropriate' for supporting economic recovery, which may result in inconsistencies or lack of oversight (Section 119).

  • The 'GAO report on economic development programs' requires evaluations and recommendations without specifying the effectiveness measurement criteria, potentially leading to ambiguous outcomes in policy amendments (Section 123).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Economic Development Reauthorization Act of 2024 outlines various sections aimed at promoting economic growth through public works, infrastructure development, and support for different regions and communities. It includes provisions for grants, establishment of offices for tribal and disaster recovery, adjustments in grant criteria, and modernization of environmental reviews, emphasizing coordination and support across federal agencies and regions.

101. Findings and declarations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress identifies several ongoing economic challenges in the United States, including unemployment, economic shifts, and infrastructure needs. To address these, they propose partnerships across government levels and emphasize community development, aiming to create jobs, modernize facilities, and support resilient and sustainable economic growth.

2. Findings and declarations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress identifies ongoing economic challenges such as high unemployment and changing industries in certain U.S. areas, and emphasizes the importance of partnerships between the federal government, local communities, and other stakeholders to foster economic growth through infrastructure improvements, job creation, and community empowerment. To support a resilient and competitive economy, it advocates for federal assistance to both urban and rural distressed areas, encouraging collaboration and innovation, and aims to modernize facilities and boost travel and tourism.

102. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, certain terms used in the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 are updated. It introduces new definitions such as "blue economy" for sustainable use of water resources, "capacity building" for community project planning activities, and "outdoor recreation" for nature-based recreational activities. It also defines various regional commissions and updates existing language to clarify roles in travel and tourism.

103. Increased coordination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amended Section 103 of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 allows the Secretary of Commerce to organize meetings with various government and economic groups to enhance coordination on economic development activities. It specifically requires regular meetings with Regional Commissions to share strategies, minimize duplicate efforts, and plan future actions, with a report on these efforts made public within a year after each meeting.

104. Grants for public works and economic development Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to improve waste management, increase economic resilience, and support rural areas. It adds new considerations for grants, such as addressing extreme weather impacts, improving broadband access, boosting outdoor recreation, and promoting the blue economy.

105. Grants for planning and grants for administrative expenses Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act to allow grant funds to be used for various administrative expenses, such as planning, project predevelopment, and hiring professional staff to help communities with economic development tasks. It also revises the criteria for grant use to include measures addressing the impacts of extreme weather and expanding broadband services.

106. Cost sharing Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to increase the federal share of project costs from 50% to 60%, allows funds from a Regional Commission to count as the non-federal share, and permits the Secretary to cover 100% of project costs for certain small communities and for projects related to major disasters. Additionally, it updates authorization for disaster economic recovery activities.

703. Authorization of appropriations for disaster economic recovery activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes funding for activities aimed at helping economic recovery after disasters.

107. Regulations on relative needs and allocations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to update the criteria considered for economic growth plans by replacing one subparagraph with a new one that focuses on per capita income, labor force participation, and underemployment in eligible areas, and by adding "retention" to the focus on job creation.

108. Research and technical assistance; university centers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act to allow grants for creating university centers that offer technical and business development support across all states. These centers will work with other institutions and agencies to foster economic strategies, support local businesses, assist with data and research, and promote economic growth, especially in distressed communities.

109. Investment priorities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the investment priorities necessary for a project to receive assistance under the Public Works and Economic Development Act. The priorities include supporting critical infrastructure, workforce development, innovation and entrepreneurship, economic recovery resilience, and manufacturing, while allowing the Secretary to propose additional priorities with notification to specific Congressional committees.

208. Investment priorities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that for projects to receive assistance, they must align with specific investment priorities such as developing critical infrastructure, boosting workforce skills, encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship, enhancing economic resilience, or expanding manufacturing. If the Secretary wishes to use an investment priority not listed, they must notify relevant Congressional committees in writing.

110. Grants for economic adjustment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes amendments to the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, focusing on grants for areas affected by economic dislocation in the steel industry, as well as coal and nuclear host communities. It outlines eligibility criteria and the process for granting financial assistance to communities impacted by industry contractions, closures, or decommissioning activities.

111. Renewable energy program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act to redefine a “renewable energy site” as a brownfield area using renewable energy technologies like solar and wind. It also changes the name from "brightfields demonstration" to "renewable energy," updates terminology throughout the section, and removes subsection (d).

112. Workforce training grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed section would allow the Secretary to give grants to support innovative workforce training programs, including developing facilities and purchasing equipment. It also introduces a program for States to offer career scholarships for jobs in high-demand industries that do not require a college degree, with the Federal government covering no more than 70% of the costs.

Money References

  • “(A) In a case in which the individual is also eligible for a Federal Pell Grant under section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) for enrollment at the applicable training program for any award year of the training program, $11,000 minus the amount of the awarded Federal Pell Grant.
  • “(B) For an individual not described in paragraph (1), the lesser of— “(i) $11,000; and “(ii) the total cost of the training program in which the individual is enrolled, including tuition, fees, career navigation services, textbook costs, expenses related to assessments and exams for certification or licensure, equipment costs, and wage stipends (in the case of a training program that is an earn-and-learn program). “(d) Coordination.—The Secretary shall coordinate the development of new workforce development models with the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education.”.

219. Workforce training grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes a program where the Secretary can give grants to help create and grow innovative workforce training programs through partnerships. These grants can be used by states for building facilities, buying equipment, designing programs, or even offering scholarships to individuals pursuing high-demand jobs that don't require a college degree. States must follow certain guidelines to apply for these grants, and the Federal government will cover up to 70% of the costs.

Money References

  • (A) In a case in which the individual is also eligible for a Federal Pell Grant under section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) for enrollment at the applicable training program for any award year of the training program, $11,000 minus the amount of the awarded Federal Pell Grant.
  • (B) For an individual not described in paragraph (1), the lesser of— (i) $11,000; and (ii) the total cost of the training program in which the individual is enrolled, including tuition, fees, career navigation services, textbook costs, expenses related to assessments and exams for certification or licensure, equipment costs, and wage stipends (in the case of a training program that is an earn-and-learn program). (d) Coordination.—The Secretary shall coordinate the development of new workforce development models with the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education.

113. Congressional notification requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the Secretary must notify certain Congressional committees at least 3 business days before awarding a large grant (over $100,000) to any project. The notification must include details like the project name, applicant, location, grant amount, and a description, and it must be made publicly available within 60 days.

Money References

  • “(b) Projects described.—A project referred to in subsection (a) is a project that the Secretary has selected to receive a grant administered by the Economic Development Administration in an amount not less than $100,000.

220. Congressional notification requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the Secretary is required to inform certain Congressional committees at least three days before awarding a grant of $100,000 or more for projects picked by the Economic Development Administration. This notification must include details like the project name, applicant, location, grant amount, and a project description, and must be made publicly available within 60 days.

Money References

  • (b) Projects described.—A project referred to in subsection (a) is a project that the Secretary has selected to receive a grant administered by the Economic Development Administration in an amount not less than $100,000.

114. Specific flexibilities related to deployment of high-speed broadband Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes a new initiative to boost high-speed broadband deployment by allowing grants for projects that expand or improve internet access, especially in underserved areas. It outlines who can receive these grants, such as public-private partnerships, and details how the property involved in these projects will be managed. It also ensures that those who help design projects are not disqualified from competing to provide related services and allows for credit towards the local share of project costs.

221. High-speed broadband deployment initiative Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes a federal initiative to support high-speed broadband deployment, where grants may be given to eligible recipients, like public-private partnerships, to help plan, develop, or improve broadband services. It outlines the application process, property ownership rules, and conditions for sharing the costs with non-federal contributions.

115. Critical supply chain site development grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the Critical Supply Chain Site Development Grant Program, which allows the Secretary to provide grants to develop or expand sites for manufacturing purposes. When awarding these grants, preference is given to projects that support economic development and workforce training, especially in rural and disadvantaged areas, and have financial backing from other sources.

222. Critical supply chain site development grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Critical Supply Chain Site Development Grant Program allows the Secretary to provide grants to eligible recipients for developing or expanding sites to prepare them for manufacturing projects. When selecting grant recipients, the Secretary considers factors like economic improvement in rural or tribal areas, alignment with regional plans, workforce development efforts, and support for strategically important industries. Priority is given to projects with additional funding sources and those likely to attract business interest. The grants can be used for activities such as improving site utilities, land preparation, environmental assessments, and job training, but recipients are not required to have a specific company committed to using the site.

116. Updated distress criteria and grant rates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed changes to the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 update the criteria for determining if an area needs economic assistance. New conditions include facing severe unemployment or economic problems, having a low median household income, low labor force participation, significant prime-age employment gaps, or experiencing economic distress due to transitions in energy industries.

117. Comprehensive economic development strategies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 117 of the bill amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 by highlighting the need to consider extreme weather in economic development strategies, and it establishes that this section does not apply to certain regional grants.

118. Office of Tribal Economic Development Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the Office of Tribal Economic Development within the Economic Development Administration to coordinate and assist with Tribal economic development activities. It outlines purposes like helping Tribal communities access aid, ensuring coordination with other Federal agencies, creating a strategic economic plan, implementing outreach via a website, and ensuring dedicated staff for these initiatives.

508. Office of Tribal economic development Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

There is a new Office of Tribal Economic Development being set up within the Economic Development Administration to help Tribal communities access economic assistance and coordinate strategies with other federal agencies. This Office will create and update a strategic plan for Tribal economic development every three years and will utilize a website to provide information to Tribal leaders and communities about accessing programs that support economic growth.

119. Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience is being established to help communities recover economically after disasters. It will have teams that can quickly respond to emergencies, and the Secretary can appoint temporary or permanent staff to assist. The office will also coordinate with other federal agencies and provide necessary training and resources to ensure effective disaster recovery efforts.

509. Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience to manage economic recovery after disasters, allowing the appointment of temporary personnel with the option of converting them to permanent positions, and forming a specialized disaster team. This team will include staff from various departments and agencies, receive training, and may utilize resources from other federal agencies to effectively handle post-disaster recovery efforts.

120. Establishment of technical assistance liaisons Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a role called "Technical Assistance Liaison" within the Economic Development Administration. This liaison will help underresourced communities apply for grants by offering technical support and feedback on unsuccessful applications, and the Secretary may also provide additional support through contracts or agreements.

510. Technical assistance liaisons Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A regional office's Regional Director in the Economic Development Administration can appoint a "Technical Assistance Liaison" to help underresourced communities apply for assistance. This Liaison works with an Economic Development Representative to provide extra technical support and give feedback on unsuccessful grant applications. Additionally, the Secretary can make agreements to offer more technical help to these communities.

121. Annual report to Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 603(b) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 requires the addition of details in the annual report to Congress. It mandates listing all grants for rural projects, explaining how they benefit rural areas, and certifying that each project is located in or primarily benefits rural areas.

122. Modernization of environmental reviews Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the Secretary of Commerce report to Congress about efforts to make environmental reviews of projects more efficient and predictable. This includes considering new ways to speed up the process, like using common exclusions and impacts assessments, and potentially creating agreements with other agencies.

123. GAO report on economic development programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The document requires the Comptroller General to submit a report by September 30, 2026, evaluating how economic development programs by the Economic Development Administration and Regional Commissions impact job creation, unemployment rates, and private investments. The report will also include coordination efforts, other relevant factors, and suggestions for legislative improvements.

124. GAO report on Economic Development Administration regulations and policies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the Comptroller General is required to submit a report to certain congressional committees within two years, evaluating economic development regulations and policies that have posed challenges for communities, particularly small ones, in obtaining and managing grants from the Economic Development Administration. The report will review grant application processes, assess the technical capacity of potential grant recipients, identify barriers faced by small communities, and suggest ways to simplify and improve the grant application experience.

125. GAO study on rural communities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the Comptroller General conduct a study within two years of the Act's enactment to assess the impacts of Economic Development Administration funding on rural distressed communities. The study should focus on at least five different communities and examine effects on local employment and affordable housing, with a report of findings and recommendations submitted to specific congressional committees.

126. General authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the authorized funding over the fiscal years 2025 to 2029 for various grant programs under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, including grants for public works, planning, training, economic adjustment, and assistance for coal and nuclear host communities, as well as renewable energy and workforce training initiatives. Each program is assigned specific amounts that are to remain available until used, and a section of the Act is struck as a conforming amendment.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—Section 701 of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3231) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (k); and (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following: “(a) Grants for public works and economic development.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 201, to remain available until expended— “(1) $170,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(2) $195,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; “(3) $220,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; “(4) $245,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; and “(5) $270,000,000 for fiscal year 2029.
  • “(b) Grants for planning and grants for administrative expenses.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 203, to remain available until expended— “(1) $90,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(2) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; “(3) $110,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; “(4) $120,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; and “(5) $130,000,000 for fiscal year 2029.
  • “(c) Grants for training, research, and technical assistance.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 207, to remain available until expended— “(1) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; “(3) $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; “(4) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; and “(5) $45,000,000 for fiscal year 2029.
  • (d) Grants for economic adjustment.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 209 (other than subsections (d) and (e)), to remain available until expended— “(1) $65,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(2) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; “(3) $85,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; “(4) $95,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; and “(5) $105,000,000 for fiscal year 2029.
  • “(e) Assistance to coal communities.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 209(d) $75,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, to remain available until expended.
  • “(f) Assistance to nuclear host communities.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 209(e), to remain available until expended— “(1) to carry out paragraph (2)(A), $35,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029; and “(2) to carry out paragraph (2)(B), $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2027.
  • “(g) Renewable energy program.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 218 $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, to remain available until expended.
  • “(h) Workforce training grants.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 219 $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, to remain available until expended, of which $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 shall be used to carry out subsection (c) of that section.
  • “(i) Critical supply chain site development grant program.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 222 $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, to remain available until expended.
  • “(j) Technical assistance liaisons.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 510 $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, to remain available until expended.”.

127. Technical correction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines a revised table of contents for the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965. It includes sections on forming economic partnerships, grants and funding for public works, eligibility criteria for development strategies, economic development districts, administrative roles, miscellaneous provisions, and authorization of appropriations for various economic activities.

201. Regional commission authorizations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill changes Section 15751 of title 40 in the United States Code to authorize $40 million in funding each year for regional commissions from 2025 to 2029.

Money References

  • SEC. 201. Regional commission authorizations. Section 15751 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following: “(a) In general.—There is authorized to be appropriated to each Commission to carry out this subtitle $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029.”.

202. Regional commission modifications Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies various parts of title 40 of the United States Code related to regional commissions. It updates membership rules, quorum requirements for meetings, administrative powers, procedures for meetings, and the deadline for annual reports.

203. Transfer of funds among Federal agencies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section in the bill allows Commissions to transfer funds to and from other federal agencies, provided the funds are used for their intended purposes and the agency giving the funds agrees they are eligible. It also includes a clerical change by renaming a section to ensure proper organization.

15308. Transfer of funds among Federal agencies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A Commission can transfer money to and accept money from other Federal agencies if it's used correctly. Money can be moved to another agency if it's used for its original purpose. Money transferred to a Commission can only be used if the original rules allow it and the agency providing the money agrees it's an eligible use.

204. Economic and infrastructure development grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill amends title 40 of the United States Code to include activities such as coordinating with federal agencies to enhance infrastructure for resilience against extreme weather and promoting the construction of housing to support economic and workforce needs. Additionally, it updates subsection references to reflect these changes.

205. Financial assistance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text amends Chapter 155 of subtitle V of title 40, United States Code, to allow funds from this section to be used to pay for the non-Federal portion of projects funded by other Federal grant programs, as long as these projects are not mainly funded by a Commission and align with the Commission's authority.

15507. Payment of non-Federal share for certain Federal grant programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains that the money allocated under this subtitle can be used to cover the non-Federal portion of costs for projects funded by other Federal grants, as long as a Commission is not the main funder and the projects align with the Commission’s legal powers.

206. Northern Border Regional Commission area Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the Northern Border Regional Commission area by adding the counties of Lincoln, Merrimack, and Wyoming to the list of regions specified in Title 40 of the United States Code.

207. Southwest Border Regional Commission area Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends parts of the United States Code to update the list of counties included in the Southwest Border Regional Commission area by adding Bernalillo, Cibola, Curry, De Baca, Guadalupe, Roosevelt, Torrance, and Valencia, while correcting punctuation in a list that includes Tom Green and Upton.

208. Great Lakes Authority area Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a part of the United States Code to clarify that the Great Lakes Authority area includes entire or partial counties.

209. Additional regional commission programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces Chapter 159, which establishes additional regional commission programs, including a State capacity building grant program and demonstration health projects. The State capacity building program aims to support business development, job creation, university partnerships, and infrastructure improvements in eligible counties, while the demonstration health projects focus on planning, constructing, and operating health facilities to stimulate regional economic growth, with special priorities for addiction treatment, healthcare workforce shortages, and chronic health issue screenings.

15901. State capacity building grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a State capacity building grant program through which Commissions provide financial support to states with eligible counties for various development purposes like business retention, job creation, infrastructure improvement, and enhancing technical capacities. Funds from these grants cannot be used for purchasing furniture or compensating members of the Commission and must be reported on their use annually.

15902. Demonstration health projects Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows a Commission to provide grants for planning, building, equipping, and operating health projects to boost economic development in a region. Eligible grants can be used for various health facilities and services, with specific conditions and a priority on addiction treatment, healthcare workforce shortages, and access to chronic health screenings.

210. Tribal and colonia participation in southwest border region Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, a new rule is added to allow the Southwest Border Regional Commission to waive the requirement for Indian tribes and colonias to pay part of the cost when they receive federal assistance. It defines a "colonia" as a community in Arizona, California, New Mexico, or Texas, close to the U.S.-Mexico border, that lacks basic necessities like water, sewage, or safe housing, and has been officially recognized as such.

15508. Waiver of matching requirement for Indian tribes and colonias in Southwest Border Regional Commission programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the term "colonia" refers to a community in Arizona, California, New Mexico, or Texas, located near the U.S.-Mexico border, which lacks basic services like water, sewage, or housing, and is recognized by government programs. It also states that for projects assisted by the Southwest Border Regional Commission, the federal government may cover the entire cost for colonias and Indian tribes, as decided by specified officials.

211. Establishment of Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission as a new entity under the United States Code, specifying that it will cover all counties in Delaware, and certain counties in Maryland and Pennsylvania not served by the Appalachian Regional Commission. It also makes a clerical amendment to include this new commission in the legal code and clarifies application rules for counties covered by the commission.

15735. Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the counties included in the Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission, covering all counties in Delaware and those in Maryland and Pennsylvania not currently served by the Appalachian Regional Commission.

212. Establishment of Southern New England Regional Commission Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text establishes the Southern New England Regional Commission and defines its region to include all counties in Rhode Island, certain counties in Connecticut (Hartford, Middlesex, New Haven, New London, Tolland, and Windham), and specific counties in Massachusetts (Barnstable, Bristol, Essex, Hampden, Plymouth, and Worcester). It also amends existing laws to integrate this new commission into relevant parts of the United States Code.

15736. Southern New England Regional Commission Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Southern New England Regional Commission covers all the counties in Rhode Island, and certain counties in Connecticut (Hartford, Middlesex, New Haven, New London, Tolland, and Windham) and Massachusetts (Barnstable, Bristol, Essex, Hampden, Plymouth, and Worcester).

213. Denali Commission reauthorization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section reauthorizes the Denali Commission by increasing its funding to $35 million per year for 2025 through 2029, adjusts how commission members are appointed, clarifies the duties and powers of the commission, and allows commission funds to be used as a non-federal share in certain projects. Additionally, it removes requirements involving the Secretary of Commerce and makes other technical adjustments to the Act.

Money References

  • (a) Reauthorization.—Section 312(a) of the Denali Commission Act of 1998 (42 U.S.C. 3121 note; Public Law 105–277) is amended by striking “$15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021” and inserting “$35,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029”.

214. Denali Housing Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Denali Housing Fund is established to provide financial support through grants and loans for constructing and improving housing for low-income and moderate-income households, as well as housing for public employees, in rural Alaska. It authorizes the Federal Cochair of the Denali Commission to manage the fund, provide technical assistance, and outline eligibility and conditions for receiving financial aid.

Money References

  • (D) GENERAL EXPENSES.—The Federal Cochair may charge the general expenses of carrying out this section to the Fund. (3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Fund $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029.

215. Delta Regional Authority reauthorization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Delta Regional Authority's funding is increased from $30 million to $40 million per year for fiscal years 2025 through 2029, and the authority can now collect and use fees from the Delta Doctors program. Additionally, Indian Tribes are included alongside States as eligible parties for certain activities, and new provisions are added for continuity when key leadership positions are vacant.

Money References

  • (a) Authorization of appropriations.—Section 382M(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2009aa–12(a)) is amended by striking “$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023” and inserting “$40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029”.

216. Northern Great Plains Regional Authority reauthorization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates funding for the Northern Great Plains Regional Authority, increasing the budget to $40 million each year from 2025 to 2029. Additionally, it removes the part of the law that previously ended the Authority's powers.

Money References

  • (a) Authorization of appropriations.—Section 383N(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2009bb–12(a)) is amended by striking “$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2018” and inserting “$40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029”.