Overview

Title

To establish within the Office of Land and Emergency Management of the Environmental Protection Agency the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to set up a new office to help clean up old mining places, especially in mountains and deserts, and work with other groups to make sure these areas are safe for people and nature. It includes special plans for places where uranium might be a problem, but it doesn't give new rules for what has to be done.

Summary AI

S. 3858 aims to establish the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains within the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Land and Emergency Management. This new office will oversee and coordinate response actions for sites where mining activities have ceased, including those within Indian country. The bill emphasizes interagency collaboration and engagement with various stakeholders, such as federal agencies and tribal governments, to address environmental and health issues related to these mines. It also includes provisions for developing interagency plans, especially for abandoned uranium sites on Navajo Nation lands, but does not grant any new regulatory authority.

Published

2024-03-12
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-03-12
Package ID: BILLS-118s3858rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
2,011
Pages:
12
Sentences:
26

Language

Nouns: 650
Verbs: 153
Adjectives: 89
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 66
Entities: 134

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.55
Average Sentence Length:
77.35
Token Entropy:
5.14
Readability (ARI):
42.05

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2024," aims to create a new office within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) named the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains. The main purpose of this office is to coordinate the cleanup and management of abandoned mine sites, with a specific focus on areas within Indian country and the Navajo Nation. The bill outlines various responsibilities for this new office, including working with federal and state agencies, tribes, and other stakeholders to improve mine site remediation efforts. The legislation emphasizes interagency coordination while stating that no new regulatory authority is provided beyond existing laws.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several potential issues have been identified in the bill. Firstly, the lack of a specified budget or spending limit could open the door to unchecked spending, raising concerns about fiscal responsibility. Additionally, the unclear distribution of authority among different government entities and agencies might result in coordination challenges and inefficiencies. Furthermore, the broad definition of what constitutes a "covered mine site" could lead to significant administrative costs.

The bill also uses vague language around "innovative technologies and reuse approaches" without specifying what qualifies as innovation, which might complicate implementation. The plan for addressing uranium contamination on the Navajo Nation lacks detailed criteria and outcomes, which could undermine its effectiveness. Lastly, the requirement for regular updates and consultations with Tribal governments might be burdensome, potentially leading to administrative inefficiencies.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broadly speaking, this bill has the potential to significantly impact public health and environmental quality by addressing the longstanding problems associated with abandoned mine sites. Successful coordination among federal agencies, tribal governments, and other stakeholders could greatly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of cleanup efforts, potentially revitalizing affected ecosystems and communities.

On the other hand, if not managed carefully, the broad scope in defining covered mine sites and the lack of specified budget constraints could lead to misuse of resources, affecting taxpayers negatively. Moreover, without clear directives on the technologies and strategies to be used, the bill's implementation could face inconsistencies, reducing its overall effectiveness.

For specific stakeholders, the bill presents both opportunities and challenges. Tribal governments might benefit from heightened consultation and involvement in remediation efforts on their lands. However, this requirement may also impose additional administrative burdens, potentially straining resources. Additionally, the potential lack of clear leadership criteria in appointing the Office’s Director may raise concerns about the quality and direction of leadership, possibly impacting stakeholder trust and collaboration.

In conclusion, while the "Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2024" seeks to address complex environmental issues with abandoned mines, ensuring its success will require careful attention to defining clear responsibilities, budget constraints, and effective leadership to avoid inefficiencies and maximize positive outcomes for the environment and all affected stakeholders.

Issues

  • The bill, in Section 2, does not specify a detailed budget or spending limit, which could lead to potential wasteful spending. This absence of financial boundaries might raise public concern over responsible fiscal management.

  • Section 2 outlines the potential for interagency coordination challenges due to an unclear level of authority and responsibility between government entities and agencies. This could result in inefficiencies and delays in implementing the bill's objectives.

  • The broad definition of 'covered mine site' in Section 2(3) may lead to extensive administrative costs by including a wide array of sites, some with minimal risk.

  • The term 'innovative technologies and reuse approaches' in Section 2(c)(2)(A) is vague, lacking specificity in what constitutes innovation. This could create interpretative challenges, affecting implementation consistency and public transparency.

  • The plan for uranium contamination on the Navajo Nation in Section 2(d)(3) lacks specificity in assessment criteria and outcomes, potentially resulting in inadequate response actions that may fail to effectively address public health and environmental concerns.

  • The requirement for regular updates and consultations with Tribal governments, as noted in Section 2(d)(2), may be burdensome and lead to administrative inefficiencies if not well-coordinated, raising concerns among affected stakeholders.

  • The language in Section 2(b)(2) regarding the appointment of the Director of the Office might be ambiguous concerning the qualifications required, potentially leading to unclear standards for leadership and competency.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act establishes its short title, specifying that it can be referred to as the "Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2024."

2. Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The "Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains" is established within the Environmental Protection Agency to coordinate efforts to deal with abandoned mine sites, especially those in Indian country and Navajo Nation. This office will work with various government agencies, tribes, and stakeholders to improve mine site cleanup processes and develop interagency plans, without creating any new regulatory authority.