Overview
Title
To amend the Clean Air Act to create a national zero-emission vehicle standard, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants car makers to only sell cars that don't pollute the air by 2035, like electric cars, to help keep our air clean and stop bad climate changes. If car makers can't do this, they might have to pay, but they can also trade special "clean car" points to help them comply.
Summary AI
The bill, known as the "Zero-Emission Vehicles Act of 2024," proposes amendments to the Clean Air Act to establish a national standard for zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs). It requires vehicle manufacturers to progressively increase the percentage of ZEVs sold, reaching 100% by 2035. This legislation aims to promote cleaner vehicle technologies, enhance public health, and reduce climate-destabilizing pollution. Additionally, it allows for the trading of ZEV credits to meet compliance and sets penalties for manufacturers who fail to meet the requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Zero-Emission Vehicles Act of 2024" is a legislative effort aimed at reducing pollution from vehicles by amending the Clean Air Act. The bill establishes a national zero-emission vehicle standard, which mandates that all new vehicles sold in the United States by model year 2035 be zero-emission. Beginning in 2027, manufacturers will be required to meet gradually increasing percentages of zero-emission vehicle sales, culminating in the total transition to zero-emission vehicles by 2035. The bill also introduces a system of credits that can be traded, sold, or exchanged to help manufacturers comply with these standards. Non-compliance could result in significant penalties.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from this legislation. Firstly, the requirement that all new vehicles be zero-emission by 2035 could have significant economic implications, particularly for smaller manufacturers and regions with less infrastructure to support such a transition. Additionally, the penalties for non-compliance could pose a financial burden on smaller manufacturers who may struggle to meet the new standards.
The bill gives broad discretion to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which could result in inconsistencies in its implementation. Moreover, the processes for trading and managing zero-emission vehicle credits lack clear guidelines, potentially favoring larger manufacturers who have greater resources. There is also concern that the Act's reliance on state participation without preemption could lead to a fragmented regulatory environment, complicating compliance efforts for manufacturers.
Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
From a broad public perspective, the benefits of this bill could be significant in terms of reducing air pollution, which could lead to improved public health outcomes and environmental benefits across the country. For individuals living in areas heavily impacted by vehicle emissions, this shift could present a significant improvement in air quality and overall health.
Manufacturers are likely divided in their reception of this bill. Large vehicle manufacturers might have the resources to adapt and thrive under the new regulations. They could benefit from selling zero-emission vehicle credits and potentially see increased demand for clean technology vehicles. On the other hand, smaller manufacturers could face challenges meeting these targets without substantial investment or support, possibly impacting their viability.
For consumers, this shift represents a promise of more environmentally friendly choices. However, unless supported by advances in technology and infrastructure, the transition might initially lead to increased vehicle costs. Meanwhile, individual states might either embrace or resist the challenge of enhancing infrastructure to support zero-emission vehicles, leading to varied experiences across the nation.
The legislation also implicitly recognizes the important roles that various levels of government and the manufacturing sector play in addressing a significant environmental concern. However, the path to achieving these goals requires careful planning, oversight, and potentially additional legislative refinements to mitigate unintended economic consequences and ensure a fair transition for all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The requirement for vehicle manufacturers to sell only zero-emission vehicles by model year 2035 (Sections 3 and 220) could have significant economic implications for small manufacturers and certain regions that may not be prepared for such a transition.
The penalties for non-compliance as outlined in Section 220 subsection (m) are considered burdensome and may disproportionately affect smaller manufacturers, leading to potential financial distress.
The bill leaves broad discretion to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in multiple sections (Sections 2, 3, and 220), which could lead to inconsistencies and perceived biases in the implementation and enforcement of the zero-emission vehicle standards.
The process and transparency in the issuance, sale, transfer, and exchange of zero-emission vehicle credits in Section 220 are not clearly defined, raising concerns about potential exploitation and market fairness.
There is potential favoritism towards large manufacturers that can afford to purchase zero-emission vehicle credits as outlined in Section 220, possibly disadvantaging smaller manufacturers who may lack similar resources.
The Act's reliance on state participation without preemption (Section 220(j)) could create a patchwork of regulations, complicating nationwide compliance for manufacturers.
The requirement of binding statutory sales targets for zero-emission vehicles in Section 2 may not be feasible without adequate research and could encounter logistical challenges.
Section 3 excludes motor vehicle parts suppliers and dealers from the definition of 'vehicle manufacturer', potentially creating ambiguities in market influence on zero-emission vehicles.
The broad language regarding Congress's intent in Section 4 might result in ambiguity concerning the President's or Federal agencies' authority under the Clean Air Act, necessitating further clarification.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In SECTION 1, the Act is given the short title “Zero-Emission Vehicles Act of 2024” or “ZEVs Act of 2024.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that zero-emission vehicles have many benefits, such as reducing pollution and creating economic opportunities. They also recognize the need for mandatory sales of these vehicles to encourage the adoption of cleaner technologies and to support infrastructure planning.
3. National zero-emission vehicle standard Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed section introduces a National Zero-Emission Vehicle Standard as an amendment to the Clean Air Act, which requires vehicle manufacturers to gradually increase the percentage of zero-emission vehicles they sell, starting in 2027 and reaching 100% by 2035. The section outlines the issuance and trading of zero-emission vehicle credits to ensure compliance, and provides regulations for enforcement, including penalties for manufacturers who fail to meet these requirements.
220. National zero-emission vehicle standard Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a national standard for zero-emission vehicles, specifying that by 2035, all new vehicles sold by manufacturers must be zero-emission. It also details how manufacturers can earn, trade, and retire zero-emission vehicle credits, outlines penalties for non-compliance, and emphasizes state rights to impose stricter regulations.
4. Congressional intent Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section clarifies that the Act does not intend to change the President's or any federal agency's authority under the Clean Air Act. It confirms that it does not limit the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) power to set emissions standards for new vehicles, and it does not prevent the EPA from considering all technologies, including zero-emission ones, when making these decisions.