Overview
Title
To establish an interagency Working Group to study financial safety and inclusion for survivors, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to make a special team to help people who have been hurt by bad people taking their money or not letting them use their money. This team will look at how banks and money places can be kinder and safer for these people and will tell grown-ups in charge how they can make this better every year.
Summary AI
S. 3835, known as the "Survivor Financial Safety and Inclusion Working Group Act," aims to create an interagency working group focused on the financial safety and inclusion of individuals who have survived domestic violence and economic abuse. This group will study how financial institutions can better support and protect survivors, especially those from underbanked communities. It will gather data on economic abuse tactics and recommend improvements for financial services and products tailored to survivors' needs. The working group will report its findings and progress annually to relevant committees in Congress, ensuring transparency and accountability.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, titled the "Survivor Financial Safety and Inclusion Working Group Act," aims to form an interagency working group to study and improve financial safety and inclusion for survivors of domestic violence, particularly focusing on economic abuse. The bill outlines how financial institutions can better support survivors through data collection, improved financial services, and products. It emphasizes the inclusion of underserved communities such as rural areas, low- and moderate-income households, and members of Indian tribes.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill establishes a collaborative interagency working group composed of major financial regulatory and policymaking bodies, such as the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve System, among others. Their task is to assess how financial institutions can assist people experiencing domestic violence by safely collecting data on economic abuse and by developing tailored financial services. The group will also study existing financial products to identify potential improvements that could address the unique challenges faced by survivors. Annual reports documenting their findings and recommendations will be submitted to key Senate and House committees, ensuring ongoing legislative oversight.
Summary of Significant Issues
One notable issue in the bill is the broad definition of "economic abuse," which may lack the precision needed for effective enforcement and understanding. Similarly, the complex references to external legislative acts when defining "regulated financial institution" might hinder full comprehension among various stakeholders. Moreover, the bill does not designate a clear budget or source of funding for the Working Group's activities, potentially complicating resource allocation. Another issue arises with the term limits for appointed members, which might undermine the group's continuity and the retention of expertise. The balance between required transparency and allowed confidential communication could also lead to conflicts or confusion regarding what information can be shared publicly.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, if effectively implemented, this bill could significantly enhance financial security and autonomy for survivors of domestic violence, helping them regain control over their economic lives. By focusing on underbanked and underserved communities, it also addresses financial inclusion gaps that could benefit society at large by promoting inclusive economic participation. However, the lack of a specified implementation mechanism for the group's recommendations might result in uncertainty regarding the real-world impact of the group's work.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Survivors of Domestic Violence: The bill's provisions could provide increased financial support and security, enabling survivors to better navigate their economic challenges. Tailored financial products could offer these individuals options for rebuilding their financial independence.
Financial Institutions: While financial institutions could benefit from clear guidelines on supporting survivors, they may also face increased regulatory scrutiny and operational demands due to the data collection and product development tasks the bill outlines.
Regulatory Bodies and Policymakers: For these stakeholders, the bill provides a structured opportunity to collaboratively address economic abuse, enhancing their role in protecting vulnerable communities. However, they may encounter challenges related to funding and executing the Working Group's initiatives.
Underserved Communities: The focus on inclusion might lead to improved access to financial products and resources, addressing historical disparities. However, realizing these benefits hinges on the successful collaboration and clear communication of the Working Group.
Ultimately, while the bill holds promise in addressing significant gaps in financial safety and inclusion, it also raises several concerns that legislators may need to address for successful implementation and impact.
Issues
The definition of 'economic abuse' in Section 2(a)(3) is broad and may require further clarification to specify the types of behavior it encompasses, potentially complicating enforcement and understanding of the term among stakeholders.
Section 2 lacks a clear budget or funding source for the activities of the Working Group, raising concerns about resource allocation and financial oversight which could affect the Group's operations.
The complex language in the definition of 'regulated financial institution' in Section 2(a)(6) which heavily relies on references to other legislative acts could make it challenging for stakeholders to fully comprehend, affecting transparency and stakeholder engagement.
Term limits and service limitations for members appointed to the Working Group in Section 2(c)(3) through (c)(6) could hinder continuity and the retention of long-term expertise, potentially affecting the efficacy of the Working Group.
The requirement for transparency in Section 2(k), while allowing confidential communications, might create conflicts or confusion regarding the information that can be shared publicly, challenging the balance between transparency and confidentiality.
The bill does not specify mechanisms for the implementation or enforcement of recommendations from the Working Group in Section 2, which might lead to uncertainty about the impacts and effectiveness of their findings.
The coverage of travel expenses for Working Group members in Section 2(h) could lead to unnecessary financial burden if not monitored, impacting the overall budget and resource allocation for the Group's activities.
Section 2 does not include mechanisms for oversight or accountability of the Working Group's activities or expenditures, which might result in inefficiencies or misuse of resources without proper checks and balances.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the official name of the Act is the "Survivor Financial Safety and Inclusion Working Group Act."
2. Working Group for Financial Safety and Inclusion for Survivors Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section establishes an interagency working group to explore how financial institutions can support survivors of domestic violence through data collection and better financial products. It sets guidelines for the group's formation, membership, operation, and responsibilities, focusing on financial safety and inclusion, especially for underserved communities.