Overview
Title
To modernize diplomatic security, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Diplomatic Security Modernization Act is like a big instruction manual for making sure the people who protect America's diplomats are ready for new challenges, like fighting cybercrime and helping people who have been hurt. It also talks about using rewards to catch bigger bad guys, like cyber criminals, and finding better ways for these protectors to manage their work time.
Summary AI
The Diplomatic Security Modernization Act aims to update various aspects of diplomatic security within the U.S. Department of State. It includes provisions for improving the organizational structure and management of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, expanding authorities related to cybercrime investigation and counter-intelligence training, and modernizing personnel policies such as timekeeping for diplomatic security agents. The bill also seeks to enhance powers for intercepting communications and investigating human trafficking, as well as broadening the scope of the Rewards for Justice Program to include major cybercrimes and sanction violations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation titled the "Diplomatic Security Modernization Act" aims to modernize the security measures within diplomatic missions and extend various authorities to the Department of State. It encompasses a wide array of sections that involve reorganizing the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, enhancing legal and administrative powers, and updating personnel policies to better support the security challenges at U.S. diplomatic postings worldwide.
Summary of the Bill
The bill's primary focus is on improving the operational capabilities of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security. It introduces provisions for additional counter-intelligence training, expands authority to investigate cyber crimes and transnational human trafficking, and allows for direct assistance to U.S. citizens victimized by crimes under investigation. Furthermore, the bill proposes to streamline processes like timekeeping for security agents and revise existing regulations that permit security contractors to operate more effectively. The legislation also suggests an update to the Rewards for Justice Program and an exemption of the Department of State from certain leasing laws.
Significant Issues
A few notable issues surface upon reviewing the bill. Firstly, the expansion of investigative authority into cyber crimes and human trafficking is not accompanied by specified funding or resources, which raises concerns about potential financial inadequacies. The bill's recommendation to exempt the Department of State from the Secure Federal LEASEs Act lacks detailed justification, potentially impacting transparency. Furthermore, certain sections, such as those related to administrative subpoenas and Rewards for Justice, use complex legal terminology that might pose challenges in understanding and implementation for those unfamiliar with legal language. Additionally, the delegation of wiretapping approval remains ambiguous, leaving room for interpretation that could impact its execution.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill has the potential to enhance the safety and security at diplomatic missions overseas, which could improve the conduct of international diplomatic relations. The increased focus on cybercrime and human trafficking investigations presents an opportunity to address these modern challenges more effectively, potentially boosting national security and international cooperation. However, there is a risk of administrative complexities and financial ambiguities if the necessary resources and clear guidelines are not provided alongside these expanded roles.
Specific Stakeholder Impacts
Diplomatic Security Personnel: Modernization efforts like automated timekeeping could streamline administrative tasks, allowing personnel to focus more on security duties. However, without a detailed implementation plan, agents face uncertainties in workload management and new oversight procedures.
Nonsecurity Staff in Diplomatic Missions: With the extension of counter-intelligence programs to nonsecurity staff, employees across various roles might be subject to increased scrutiny and training. Although intended to enhance overall mission security, these requirements could create additional burdens without clear communication and support.
Crime Victims: The provision for direct assistance represents a positive development for U.S. citizens victimized by crimes abroad, potentially increasing their support and reassurance during distressing situations. However, effective implementation and fiscal restraint are necessary to prevent misuse or unintended financial strain.
State Department and Related Agencies: The broad authority expansions and exemptions from certain laws could lead to increased efficiency and responsiveness in security operations. However, they could also necessitate better coordination among different federal agencies to prevent overlapping functions and ensure optimal use of resources.
In conclusion, the "Diplomatic Security Modernization Act" is a comprehensive approach to addressing contemporary security challenges at diplomatic posts. While it holds benefits for enhancing safety and operational effectiveness, careful attention to the bill's implementation and resource allocations is crucial to avoid potential pitfalls.
Issues
The authority to investigate cyber crimes (Section 203) and transnational human trafficking (Section 205) lacks specified funding or resources, which could lead to financial ambiguity and potential inadequacy in dealing with these crimes effectively.
The exemption of the Department of State from the Secure Federal LEASEs Act (Section 208) lacks justification or explanation of its necessity, raising concerns about possible negative impacts on transparency and oversight of leasing activities.
The expansion of the counter-intelligence personnel security program to include nonsecurity staff (Section 102) does not clearly define 'nonsecurity staff' or justify their inclusion, potentially leading to ambiguous implementation and unexpected expenses.
The modernization of the timekeeping process (Section 301) and availability for work credit (Section 302) for Diplomatic Security special agents potentially create financial implications not detailed in the bill, possibly leading to unanticipated expenses.
The administrative subpoena authority (Section 202) uses complex legal references without additional explanation, making it difficult for non-experts to understand and potentially leading to misinterpretations.
The phrase 'the Secretary of State should delegate' in Section 201 regarding delegation of preapproval for interception of communications is vague, leading to potential confusion about whether it is a suggestion or a requirement.
The expansion of rewards in the Rewards for Justice Program (Section 207) to include major cyber criminals and violators of U.S. sanctions requires clear criteria and oversight to prevent misuse of funds.
The reporting structure change for the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (Section 101) lacks clear metrics or criteria, potentially leading to subjective interpretations of the impact on diplomatic security.
There is no detailed cost analysis or accountability mechanism for the assistance provided to crime victims (Section 204), which could result in budget overruns and misuse of resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "Diplomatic Security Modernization Act" is divided into several sections that lay out its contents, starting with a summary of the Act's short title and table of contents. It covers topics such as the organization and management of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, authorizations for different types of law enforcement activities, and policies related to personnel, such as modernization of timekeeping and work credit calculations.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The definitions section of the Act explains what “appropriate congressional committees” and “Diplomatic Security special agent” mean. “Appropriate congressional committees” refers to specific committees in the Senate and House, while a “Diplomatic Security special agent” is defined as a special agent working for the Department of State.
101. Report on the Bureau of Diplomatic Security organizational reporting structure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of State to send a report to Congress within 180 days, evaluating whether the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security should remain under the supervision of the Under Secretary of State for Management or report directly to the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources. The report should explain how this change would affect the Bureau of Diplomatic Security's ability to provide a safe and secure environment for diplomacy.
102. Expansion of counter-intelligence personnel security program to include nonsecurity staff Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section expands the counter-intelligence personnel security program to include nonsecurity staff working in countries with a high and critical intelligence threat, as designated by the Under Secretary of State for Management. The changes will be effective 90 days after the law is enacted, and a report on the program's implementation is required to be submitted to Congress within 180 days.
103. Counter-intelligence training for certain Diplomatic Security special agents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that Diplomatic Security special agents who have primary counterintelligence roles or are stationed at diplomatic posts rated as High or Critical for Human Intelligence threats receive specific mandatory training in counterintelligence. Additionally, the table of contents for the relevant law is updated to reflect this new section.
418. Counter-intelligence training for certain Diplomatic Security special agents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Diplomatic Security special agents who have significant counterintelligence responsibilities or work in high-risk diplomatic locations must undergo mandatory training specifically focused on counterintelligence.
104. Role of Regional Security Officers as principal security and lead law enforcement representatives at overseas missions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Omnibus Diplomatic and Security Antiterrorism Act of 1986 clarifies that Regional Security Officers, who are special agents, serve as the main security and law enforcement representatives for U.S. overseas missions, reporting to Chiefs of Mission and the Secretary of State. The Regional Security Officers guide other U.S. government personnel working abroad under the Chief of Mission's authority.
201. Delegation of preapproval relating to interception of wire, oral, and electronic communications Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill suggests that the Secretary of State should allow certain officials in Diplomatic Security to approve the use of wiretaps instead of needing the Secretary's pre-approval, as this would help them do their jobs more effectively. Additionally, it requires updating the Foreign Affairs Manual to show this change within 90 days of the bill's enactment.
202. Administrative subpoena authority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes an amendment to Section 3486 of title 18 in the United States Code, granting administrative subpoena authority for cases involving threats to individuals or international organizations, and certain offenses. These threats and offenses are determined by the Executive Director of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and relate to the protection provided by Department of State special agents.
203. Investigation of cyber crimes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law to include cyber crimes against the Department of State's computers and systems, both domestic and overseas, as an area for investigation.
204. Authority to provide direct assistance to crime victims Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary of State to directly assist U.S. citizens who are victims of crimes and involved in investigations by the Diplomatic Security Service by providing things like emergency lodging, meals, clothing, transportation, and other necessary items.
205. Authority to investigate transnational human trafficking Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 37(a)(1) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 allows the State Department to investigate human trafficking crimes that occur partly outside the United States or involve foreign nationals.
206. Revision of certain license exception under Export Administration Regulations to apply with respect to security contractors of Department of State Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Commerce is instructed to update certain regulations so that private security contractors working with the U.S. Government can use a license exception when they support the Department of State's security operations overseas.
207. Expansion of Rewards for Justice Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The expansion of the Rewards for Justice Program allows for rewards to be given for information leading to the identification of individuals who commit major cybercrimes against the United States or who violate U.S. sanctions, with potential outcomes being their prosecution or a civil fine.
208. Exemption of Department of State from the Secure Federal LEASEs Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secure Federal LEASEs Act is being changed, so that now both the Department of Defense and the Department of State are not required to comply with it.
301. Modernization of timekeeping process Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller for the Department of State to create and start using a plan to update and automate the timekeeping process for Diplomatic Service special agents within 180 days from when the Act is enacted.
302. Availability for work credit for purposes of calculating unscheduled duty hours Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that, within 180 days from the enactment of the Act, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management must update the regulations to ensure that Diplomatic Security special agents are treated like other criminal investigators when it comes to calculating their availability pay, and that their unscheduled duty hours include times when they are available for work as determined by the Department of State.