Overview

Title

To increase the criminal penalties for assaulting a Bureau of Prisons correctional officer.

ELI5 AI

S. 3817 is like a new rule that wants to make the punishments tougher if someone hurts a special kind of police officer who works in jails. It wants the 'time-out' (jail time) and fines to be even bigger and scarier, hoping people will think twice before doing anything bad.

Summary AI

S. 3817, known as the "Safer Prisons Act of 2024," aims to increase the criminal penalties for assaulting a correctional officer in the Bureau of Prisons. The bill proposes to amend Section 111 of title 18, United States Code, by doubling the maximum term of imprisonment for such assaults. Additionally, it adjusts the applicable maximum fine in proportion to the increased imprisonment term. This legislation seeks to enhance the protection of correctional officers by imposing stricter consequences for offenses against them.

Published

2024-02-27
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-02-27
Package ID: BILLS-118s3817is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
239
Pages:
2
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 69
Verbs: 16
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 10
Entities: 23

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.28
Average Sentence Length:
39.83
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
21.92

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill titled the "Safer Prisons Act of 2024" seeks to amend the current law to impose harsher penalties on individuals who assault correctional officers working for the United States Bureau of Prisons. If enacted, this legislation will double the maximum imprisonment term for such offenses and accordingly adjust the maximum fines.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several key issues arise from the proposed legislation:

  1. Ambiguity in Definition: The bill does not clearly define what constitutes an "assault" in this context. This lack of specificity could lead to varying interpretations and inconsistent application of the law.

  2. Scope of Application: It is unclear whether the bill's enhanced penalties apply solely to federal Bureau of Prisons correctional officers or if they might also be applicable to correctional officers in other detention facilities. This distinction is crucial for appropriate enforcement.

  3. Uncertain Adjustment of Fines: The legislation mentions adjustments to the maximum fines but does not offer details on how these adjustments are to be determined. This vagueness could pose challenges for the legal and judicial systems in setting consistent penalties.

Potential Impact on the Public

The broader public might perceive this bill as a measure to reinforce safety within correctional facilities and deter violence against correctional staff. By augmenting penalties, the legislation aims to signal the severity of such offenses and thereby enhance the overall security environment in prisons.

However, the impacts of this bill hinge significantly on how it is enacted and enforced. Doubts regarding the precise definition of assault and the scope of the officers covered may undermine the legislation's effectiveness and lead to legal challenges or discrepancies across different jurisdictions.

Impact on Stakeholders

Correctional Officers: Correctional officers may view this bill positively as it may provide greater legal protection against assaults, potentially improving their working conditions and sense of security on the job.

Prison Inmates: For inmates, the increased penalties could be a deterrent against violent acts towards correctional staff. However, without clear definitions, inmates may be concerned about the potential for unfair or overly broad application of the law.

Legal and Judicial System: If the issues of definition and scope remain unresolved, courts may face difficulties in uniformly applying the enhanced penalties. This could lead to an increased number of appeals and legal disputes, potentially straining judicial resources.

Federal and State Governments: While federal Bureau of Prisons officials may directly benefit from this legislative change, it remains uncertain how state governments and officials operating in state-run facilities will interpret or react to the enactment, underscoring the need for clarity in the bill’s language.

In conclusion, while the "Safer Prisons Act of 2024" aims to bolster the security of correctional officers, its success will likely depend on addressing the current ambiguities within its provisions to ensure fair and consistent application.

Issues

  • The definition of what constitutes an 'assault' is not specified in Section 2. More precise definitions are necessary to avoid ambiguity in enforcement and ensure fair application of the law.

  • Section 2 lacks clarity on whether the enhanced penalties apply exclusively to federal Bureau of Prisons correctional officers or if they extend to correctional officers in other institutions. This could lead to legal discrepancies and enforcement challenges.

  • Section 2 mentions an adjustment of the applicable maximum fine but does not provide quantification or explanation for this adjustment, resulting in potential vagueness in the law’s implementation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the official short title of the legislation, which is named the “Safer Prisons Act of 2024”.

2. Enhanced penalties for assault on Bureau of Prisons correctional officers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a law to increase penalties for assaults against correctional officers in the Bureau of Prisons by doubling the maximum prison sentence and adjusting the maximum fine.