Overview
Title
To provide the Food and Drug Administration with authority to conduct microbial sampling on concentrated animal feeding operations as necessary to facilitate a foodborne illness outbreak investigation, determine the root cause of an outbreak of foodborne illness, or address other public health needs.
ELI5 AI
The bill lets the FDA check farms where lots of animals are kept to see if there are tiny germs that might make people sick, and these farms must let them in to do these checks, but they can ask for a good time and way to do it.
Summary AI
The Expanded Food Safety Investigation Act of 2025 (S. 376) grants the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to do microbial sampling on concentrated animal feeding operations to help with foodborne illness outbreak investigations. This includes checking plants, animals, water, and the environment, with the requirement that these facilities must allow access, although they can set reasonable guidelines on how and when the sampling occurs. The act ensures collaboration with the Department of Agriculture and other public health agencies while maintaining existing rights and exemptions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Expanded Food Safety Investigation Act of 2025" is a legislative proposal introduced in the United States Senate. This bill grants the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to conduct microbial sampling at concentrated animal feeding operations. This authority is intended to help investigate foodborne illness outbreaks, determine their root causes, or address other public health needs.
General Summary of the Bill
This bill allows the Secretary of Health and Human Services to access animal feeding operations to sample for microbes when such action is deemed necessary for public health investigations. The goal is to better manage foodborne illness outbreaks by understanding their origins and preventing future occurrences. The bill ensures collaboration with the Secretary of Agriculture and relevant health agencies, mandating reasonable access for sampling without imposing additional requirements on foods under the agriculture sector's jurisdiction.
Significant Issues
A prominent concern is the lack of specific standards or criteria for the Secretary to determine when microbial sampling is necessary. This could lead to arbitrary or inconsistent application of authority. The language around "reasonable access" and "reasonable conditions" is subjective, which might result in disputes between the feeding operations and the Secretary, potentially delaying urgent public health measures. Furthermore, the lack of explicit penalties for non-compliance could weaken enforcement efforts.
Privacy concerns arise from the mandate that the collected data be shared with various agencies. Without clearly defined data protection measures, there is a risk of infringing on proprietary information. Additionally, the bill does not specify funding sources or budgets for these sampling activities, which could hinder financial planning and accountability.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the bill aims to improve public health outcomes by enhancing the government's ability to respond effectively to foodborne illnesses. For consumers, this could mean safer food supplies and quicker resolutions to outbreaks, potentially reducing the incidence of related illnesses.
Specific stakeholders, such as operators of concentrated animal feeding operations, might see this bill as imposing additional regulatory burdens. The ambiguity in what constitutes "reasonable access" could lead to operational disruptions and legal conflicts, affecting day-to-day business operations. On the other hand, public health agencies might benefit from improved data sharing, enabling better coordination in managing food safety.
Overall, while the bill's intent aligns with public health protection and food safety enhancement, its implementation could pose challenges due to the current lack of clarity and specificity in its provisions. Addressing these issues is crucial for creating a framework that fairly balances regulatory goals with the interests of affected stakeholders.
Issues
The lack of criteria or standards for the Secretary to determine the necessity of microbial sampling (Section 2(a)) raises concerns about arbitrary or inconsistent application of authority, which may have significant legal and operational implications.
The definition of 'reasonable access' (Sections 2(b) and 425(b)) is subjective, leading to potential disputes between concentrated animal feeding operations and the Secretary and creating challenges in implementing the microbial sampling effectively.
The potential infringement on privacy and confidentiality of proprietary information from feeding operations (Section 425(d)) may raise ethical concerns, especially since the bill mandates data sharing with various agencies without clearly defined scope and limits.
Absence of specific penalties or consequences for refusal to provide access for sampling (Section 425) beyond labeling it as an 'enforcement' issue could weaken enforcement efficacy and legal accountability.
The possibility for feeding operations to set 'reasonable conditions' on access (Section 2(b)) may lead to disputes or delays in microbial sampling, potentially hindering timely public health responses.
Broad criteria for determining sampling necessity, such as 'address other public health needs' (Section 425(a)), may result in inconsistent application or misinterpretation, affecting the bill's practical implementation.
The bill fails to specify any funding source or budget for conducting microbial sampling (Section 425), potentially impacting financial planning and accountability needed for effective execution.
Reliance on an external regulation for defining 'concentrated animal feeding operation' (Section 425(e)) might create understanding gaps for lay readers, reducing transparency and public comprehensibility.
The lack of standard protocols for conducting microbial sampling (Section 2) may lead to inconsistencies in practice, affecting the reliability and effectiveness of public health investigations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section gives the official short title of the Act, which is the “Expanded Food Safety Investigation Act of 2025.”
2. Microbial sampling on concentrated animal feeding operations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary of Health and Human Services to access animal feeding operations for microbial sampling when needed for public health investigations, like during a foodborne illness outbreak. It ensures cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture and other health agencies and mandates reasonable access for sampling while respecting existing exemptions.
425. Microbial sampling on concentrated animal feeding operations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the Secretary to conduct microbial sampling at concentrated animal feeding operations if it's necessary for investigating foodborne illnesses or addressing public health needs. The operations must allow access for sampling with reasonable conditions, and the information collected must be shared with relevant authorities while not imposing extra requirements on foods under the Secretary of Agriculture's jurisdiction.