Overview
Title
To address security vulnerabilities with respect to unmanned aircraft systems used by civilian Federal agencies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The DETECT Act is a plan to make sure the drones used by the government are safe, by creating new rules to keep them secure and making sure they’re not used if they don’t follow these rules.
Summary AI
S. 3758, titled the “Drone Evaluation To Eliminate Cyber Threats Act” or the “DETECT Act,” aims to improve the security of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) used by civilian federal agencies. The bill mandates the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop security guidelines for the use and management of drones by federal agencies. It requires ongoing reviews and revisions of these guidelines and updates to relevant policies. Federal agencies are also prohibited from using drones that do not comply with these new security standards, with certain exceptions, and must coordinate the disclosure of any security vulnerabilities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Drone Evaluation To Eliminate Cyber Threats Act," or the "DETECT Act," is a legislative effort by the 118th Congress aimed at enhancing cybersecurity around the use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), commonly known as drones, within civilian federal agencies. This bill acknowledges that drones, while offering significant operational advantages, also pose unique security challenges that necessitate a robust framework for their secure integration and use by governmental entities.
General Summary of the Bill
The DETECT Act mandates the development of comprehensive security guidelines and standards for the use and management of drones by federal agencies. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is charged with creating these guidelines, which aim to mitigate cybersecurity risks associated with drones. The bill emphasizes collaboration with other agencies, the private sector, and public-private partnerships to ensure that the guidelines are practical and effective.
Aside from establishing security protocols, the bill addresses the disclosure of security vulnerabilities and delineates the responsibilities of agencies and contractors in reporting potential threats. It restricts the procurement and use of drones that do not comply with the established security standards, with certain exceptions. Additionally, it requires periodic reviews and updates to guidelines, and mandates reports to Congress evaluating the effectiveness of these measures.
Summary of Significant Issues
One notable issue with the bill is the absence of specified budgetary allocations or funding mechanisms for implementing the guidelines, which could lead to resource mismanagement. Furthermore, the bill relies heavily on technical language and references to other legal codes, making it potentially inaccessible to those unfamiliar with such legal terminologies.
The timelines set for developing and implementing guidelines are ambitious and could result in hurried efforts that may overlook critical considerations. Moreover, the role of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is reactive rather than proactive, as they will provide assistance only upon request. This could lead to delays in addressing security vulnerabilities.
The bill also lacks a clear mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of pilot implementations of the guidelines before broader deployments, which might hinder timely identification and correction of issues. There is potential overlap in responsibilities between involved parties, which could cause confusion and inefficiencies.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the DETECT Act represents a proactive approach to ensuring that government use of drones does not compromise cybersecurity. By addressing potential vulnerabilities, the bill seeks to protect public data and maintain trust in government operations that involve drones. Enhanced security measures may prevent malicious exploitation of security gaps, thereby safeguarding sensitive information and national security.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Federal Agencies: The act imposes new responsibilities on federal agencies to comply with detailed security guidelines and report vulnerabilities. While these measures may strengthen cybersecurity, they could also increase administrative burdens and operational constraints, particularly for agencies with limited resources.
Contractors and Vendors: Those in the UAS supply chain must adhere to stringent reporting protocols regarding security vulnerabilities, which could raise operational costs and complicate procurement processes. On the flip side, companies that excel in cybersecurity measures may gain competitive advantages in federal contracts.
Regulatory Bodies: Entities like NIST and CISA are tasked with significant roles in guiding and supporting the implementation of these regulations. This may necessitate additional resources and coordination with other federal entities and private sector standards organizations.
Overall, the DETECT Act underscores the importance of drone cybersecurity in federal operations, aiming to balance innovation and security. However, to be truly effective, it must address identified issues and ensure that implementations are supported by adequate resources and clear operational frameworks.
Issues
The bill mandates the establishment of security guidelines for unmanned aircraft systems by Federal agencies, but does not define the budget or funding allocation for developing and implementing these guidelines. This absence could lead to financial inefficiencies and mismanagement of resources. (Section 3)
The definition section relies heavily on references to other U.S. Code sections, making it difficult for individuals unfamiliar with these references to fully understand the bill's implications. This could create legal and practical ambiguities. (Section 2)
The language regarding the prohibition on procurement and use of unmanned aircraft systems is vague, particularly regarding the exemption for commercial data buys, leading to potential loopholes. This could undermine the effectiveness of the prohibitions and create ambiguities in enforcement. (Section 5)
The timeline set for developing and publishing guidelines is tight, potentially leading to insufficient consideration of necessary factors and rushed work. This could impact the effectiveness and practicality of the guidelines. (Section 3)
The bill lacks a review mechanism to assess the effectiveness of pilot implementations of guidelines. Absence of such a mechanism could make it difficult to identify and rectify issues before a broader implementation. This oversight might result in ineffective policy applications and persistently unresolved vulnerabilities. (Section 3)
The responsibilities concerning the disclosure process for security vulnerabilities are limited, as assistance from CISA is only provided 'upon request,' potentially leading to delays in addressing critical vulnerabilities. Efficient and timely reporting is crucial for cybersecurity. (Section 4)
The potential overlap or redundancy in responsibilities between the Under Secretary and the Director concerning the review and issuance of policies might lead to confusion and inefficiencies in guideline implementation. Clear delineation of roles could enhance execution and accountability. (Section 3)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes that this legislative act can be referred to as the “Drone Evaluation To Eliminate Cyber Threats Act” or simply the “DETECT Act”.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the act, including "agency," "critical component," "Director," "information system," "national security system," "Secretary," "security vulnerability," "Under Secretary," and "unmanned aircraft system," by referring to existing laws for their meanings.
3. Security guidelines for Federal agencies on use and management of unmanned aircraft systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the development of standards and guidelines by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for the appropriate use and management of unmanned aircraft systems by federal agencies, ensuring cybersecurity and considering existing efforts and private sector practices. It also mandates a pilot implementation of these guidelines, periodic reviews and updates, and necessary revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to align with established standards.
4. Guidelines on the disclosure process for security vulnerabilities relating to unmanned aircraft systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines guidelines for handling security vulnerabilities in unmanned aircraft systems used by government agencies. It mandates agencies to establish reporting protocols for security issues, requires contractors to report vulnerabilities that may be exploited, and instructs the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and the Office of Federal Financial Management to create regulations for compliance. Additionally, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is tasked with supporting agencies in implementing these requirements and assisting in disclosing vulnerabilities to vendors.
5. Contractor compliance with coordinated disclosure of security vulnerabilities relating to agency unmanned aircraft systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines rules for U.S. federal agencies regarding the procurement and use of unmanned aircraft systems (drones), prohibiting such actions if the systems don't meet certain security standards, with exceptions for commercial data purchases, certain low-risk scenarios, and cases where waivers are granted for reasons like national security or research. The text also mandates a report on the waiver process and its effectiveness to be submitted to Congress every two years for six years, starting two years after the enactment of the act.
6. Government Accountability Office report on cybersecurity considerations of unmanned aircraft systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) is required to give a briefing within a year and a report within two years to specific Senate and House committees about the cybersecurity efforts concerning unmanned aircraft systems.