Overview

Title

An Act To reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to keep cleaning and taking care of the Great Lakes until 2031, like having extra time to make sure a big, important swimming pool stays nice and clear for everyone!

Summary AI

S. 3738 seeks to extend the authorization of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to continue funding the initiative from the fiscal year 2026 through to 2031. The purpose of this initiative is to support efforts to restore and protect the Great Lakes. The act passed the Senate on December 4, 2024.

Published

2024-12-04
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Engrossed in Senate
Date: 2024-12-04
Package ID: BILLS-118s3738es

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
160
Pages:
4
Sentences:
4

Language

Nouns: 54
Verbs: 9
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 16
Entities: 18

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.39
Average Sentence Length:
40.00
Token Entropy:
4.17
Readability (ARI):
22.36

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The "Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2024" or "GLRI Act of 2024" aims to extend the authorization of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The previous legislation authorized funding through the fiscal year 2026. However, this new Act proposes extending that authorization until the fiscal year 2031. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative is a program aimed at protecting and restoring the Great Lakes, which are crucial natural resources shared by the United States and Canada.

Significant Issues

A notable issue with the bill is its lack of specificity regarding funding amounts. While the bill effectively extends the timeframe for funding, it does not clarify how much financial support the initiative will receive during this new period. This absence of detail might lead to challenges in budget planning and could potentially enable inefficient resource allocation or wasteful spending.

Moreover, there is no mention of a detailed plan or evaluation criteria designed to manage and assess the effectiveness of the initiative over the extended period. This lack of clarity could impact accountability and the efficient use of resources intended for Great Lakes restoration.

Additionally, the legislative language references specific sections of the U.S. Code, which may be difficult for individuals unfamiliar with legal terminologies to understand. This complexity may hinder public understanding of the bill's implications and intentions.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill's impact on the public hinges on its potential to improve the environmental health and sustainability of the Great Lakes region. Healthy Great Lakes are vital not only for the ecosystems they support but also for the communities relying on them for clean water, recreation, and economic activities such as fishing and shipping. Successfully funding and managing restoration efforts could enhance the quality of life for millions living in the vicinity.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders like environmental groups and local communities around the Great Lakes, the bill represents a continuation of efforts to ensure the protection and restoration of this critical ecosystem. These stakeholders may view reauthorization as a positive step, providing a stable framework within which conservation projects can continue. However, the lack of detailed funding allocation may be a cause for concern, as it leaves ambiguity around the level of support individual projects may receive.

Government agencies and policymakers are other stakeholders affected by the bill. They might face challenges regarding planning due to the lack of financial specifics and operational guidelines described in the bill. Thus, enhancing the bill's clarity and accountability measures could benefit these stakeholders, ensuring a more effective implementation of restoration activities across the Great Lakes region.

In conclusion, while the reauthorization of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative through 2031 could significantly contribute to the environmental protection of the Great Lakes, the bill as currently drafted leaves several critical issues unaddressed. Providing clearer funding details and accountability mechanisms will be essential in maximizing the effectiveness of this initiative.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 of the bill extends funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative for an additional five years without specifying the amount of funding involved. This lack of detail may result in inefficient or wasteful spending.

  • In Section 2, the absence of a detailed plan or evaluation criteria for the reauthorization of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative could lead to a lack of accountability and inefficiency in the use of resources.

  • The legislative text in Section 2 references a specific section of the U.S. Code (33 U.S.C. 1268(c)(7)(J)(i)(VI)), which might be confusing for readers who are not familiar with legislative documents, potentially making the language overly complex.

  • The document assumes that readers are already familiar with the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and its previous funding details, which could lead to ambiguity and potential misinterpretation of the bill's intent in Section 2.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act states that it can be officially referred to as the “Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2024” or simply the “GLRI Act of 2024”.

2. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative reauthorization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill extends funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, changing the end date from the fiscal year 2026 to cover each fiscal year through 2031.