Overview
Title
To establish education partnership programs between public schools and public health agencies to prevent the misuse and overdose of synthetic opioids by youth, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The FACTS Act is like a big team-up between schools and health helpers to teach kids about the danger of some bad medicines and keep them safe. It wants to make sure everyone learns how to stop them from getting hurt and to have super helpers ready to save them if they need it.
Summary AI
The Fentanyl Awareness for Children and Teens in Schools Act (FACTS Act) aims to establish educational partnerships between public schools and health agencies to prevent synthetic opioid misuse among youth. The bill introduces a pilot grant program for creating prevention and recovery initiatives and an interagency task force to coordinate efforts and improve responses to opioid misuse. It also amends existing education and health policies to include training for school personnel, improve data collection on opioid access and effects, and support naloxone availability in school health centers. Additionally, it requires surveys to track youth awareness and exposure to synthetic opioids.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Fentanyl Awareness for Children and Teens in Schools Act, also known as the FACTS Act, is a legislative proposal aimed at curbing the misuse and overdose of synthetic opioids, particularly among youth. The bill intends to foster education partnerships between public schools and health agencies to develop preventive and recovery programs. Furthermore, it introduces amendments to existing education acts to incorporate opioid education and necessitates the collection of relevant data for better policy shaping.
General Summary
The ACTS Act sets forth a comprehensive approach to combating synthetic opioid misuse among youths through educational initiatives and regulatory amendments. The legislation proposes establishing pilot programs by providing competitive grants to selected partnerships focused on educating and preventing opioid misuse. It also intends to set up an interagency task force to evaluate and coordinate efforts against opioid misuse and improve data collection concerning the availability and impact of these substances on school grounds. Amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and Public Health Service Act are designed to weave opioid education into school curricula and provide necessary resources like naloxone in school-based health centers. Additionally, it requires updates to existing national surveys to better capture data about youth opioid use.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the way the bill is structured and articulated:
Lack of Specific Funding Limits: The bill uses ambiguous phrases like "such sums as may be necessary," particularly in sections concerning funding allocations, creating potential for unlimited financial commitments without clear budgetary constraints.
Criterion for Grant Eligibility: Section 101 lacks clearly defined criteria for selecting "eligible partnerships" and prioritizing grants, which may lead to favoritism or inequality in distribution.
Complex and Ambiguous Language: Throughout sections, especially concerning the formation of the Interagency Task Force and the grants for eligible partnerships, the language may be overly complex or vague, making it difficult for stakeholders without legal expertise to understand.
Measurement and Evaluation: There is a deficiency in the bill concerning how the effectiveness of training programs and initiatives will be evaluated, possibly leading to ineffective use of the resources dedicated to these projects.
Potential Public Impact
If implemented effectively, this bill could have several broad benefits. By fostering educational initiatives, it may raise awareness and understanding of the dangers of synthetic opioids, which could lead to a decrease in misuse and overdoses among the youth. This could further contribute to long-term public health improvement and reduce the societal costs associated with opioid addiction.
However, the vague financial provisions and complex legal language may lead to challenges in enforcing parts of the act without clear direction on funding and implementation. This could lead to inefficiencies and resource misallocations, undermining the bill's objectives.
Impact on Stakeholders
The bill could have positive effects on students, educators, and parents by increasing awareness and preventive measures in schools. Teachers and school personnel could gain essential training to identify and address opioid misuse, potentially leading to safer and better-informed school environments.
On the downside, schools and educational agencies might face administrative and operational challenges due to the complexities and ambiguities in the legislation, particularly smaller agencies with fewer resources. Agencies responsible for implementation might struggle with the bill's open-ended funding provisions and lack of clear guidelines for program effectiveness.
Overall, while the FACTS Act addresses a critical public health issue, the legislation requires clear articulation and structured provisions for it to be an effective tool in combating youth opioid misuse and overdose.
Issues
The phrase 'such sums as may be necessary' in Section 102 and Section 504 is ambiguous as it does not specify a maximum amount, potentially allowing unlimited federal spending without clear budgetary constraints.
Section 101 lacks clearly defined criteria for selecting 'eligible partnerships' and prioritizing grants, potentially leading to favoritism or inequality in funding distribution.
The term 'qualified nongovernmental entity' in Section 101(b)(1)(B) is vague, potentially leading to inconsistent interpretations and implementations across partnerships.
In Section 201, the broad discretion given to the Secretary to include 'such other Federal or non-Federal representatives' without clear criteria in the Interagency Task Force membership raises concerns about transparency and potential bias.
The bill lacks a method for measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of programs and training initiatives in Section 301 and Section 101, raising concerns about resource wastage and program inefficiency.
Section 504 allows for spending 'such sums as may be necessary' without specific limits, creating potential for unrestricted financial commitments for evaluations without accountability.
There is potential for redundancy or overlap in funding initiatives in Section 101 without mechanisms to ensure that funded activities are new or innovative.
The bill's language, particularly in Sections 101 and 201, is overly complex, making the bill potentially challenging to understand for stakeholders without legal expertise.
The bill in Section 202 ambiguously addresses the authority of Federal agencies, possibly affecting the implementation and effectiveness of programs under existing laws.
The lack of specific guidelines or frameworks in Section 303 for State educational agencies might lead to uneven application of support measures against synthetic opioid misuse.
The bill does not address the financial implications of providing extensive training to all school personnel as outlined in Section 301, which could lead to budgetary concerns.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Fentanyl Awareness for Children and Teens in Schools Act, also known as the FACTS Act, aims to address synthetic opioid misuse and overdose among youth. It includes a pilot program for education and prevention, the creation of an interagency task force, amendments to existing education policies, and initiatives for collecting related data and enhancing school health centers.
2. Purposes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the goals of the Act, which are to create education partnerships to prevent youth misuse of synthetic opioids, promote government collaboration on best prevention practices, offer school staff professional training on opioid dangers, and enhance data availability about synthetic opioid spread.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for key terms used in the Act, including "classified school employee," which refers to various roles such as paraprofessionals and custodial staff working in schools. It also defines other terms like "Secretary," and "synthetic opioid," clarifying their specific meanings within the context of the Act.
101. Synthetic opioid misuse and overdose education, awareness, and prevention pilot program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a pilot program where grants are awarded to partnerships aiming to prevent and treat synthetic opioid misuse and overdoses among secondary school-aged children. Eligible partnerships, consisting of educational and health agencies, can use grant funds for evidence-based activities such as education, workshops, and communication campaigns, with the program emphasizing collaboration, cultural responsiveness, and accountability through periodic reports and sharing of best practices.
102. Authorization of appropriations; reservation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes funding needed to implement section 101 for fiscal years 2025 through 2027 and allows the Secretary to use up to 5% of these funds for evaluations and technical assistance related to the funded programs. It ensures that these grant funds will add to, not replace, existing federal or state funding for the same activities.
201. Interagency Task Force on Preventing Synthetic Opioid Misuse and Overdose Among Youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines the creation of an Interagency Task Force focused on preventing synthetic opioid misuse and overdose among youth. This Task Force will be led by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, include members from various governmental and non-governmental organizations, and its duties involve preparing reports and strategies to improve prevention, intervention, and treatment efforts for synthetic opioid issues in young people.
202. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section ensures that nothing in the bill restricts or changes the power of federal agencies mentioned earlier in the document from continuing their programs aimed at reducing synthetic opioid overdoses and misuse under other existing laws.
301. Professional development for school personnel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to add training for school staff, like teachers and principals, on how to handle and prevent the misuse of synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, among students.
302. Amendments to local educational agency plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act is updated to require local educational agencies to explain how they will involve teachers, school leaders, parents, and others in preventing the misuse of synthetic opioids like fentanyl among students.
303. Amendments to State educational agency plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to require state educational agencies to support local agencies in preventing the misuse of synthetic opioids, like fentanyl, among students. It involves changing the order and content of specific subparagraphs to address this new requirement.
401. National Center for Education Statistics School Crime and Safety Data Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 153(a)(1)(H) of the Education Sciences Reform Act adds a focus on the presence of illicit drugs, like fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, on school grounds, and examines how these substances impact school safety and student health.
501. Naloxone in school-based health centers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Public Health Service Act allows school-based health centers to purchase naloxone, a medication that can reverse opioid overdoses, and to start programs that address and prevent the misuse of synthetic opioids like fentanyl.
502. Amendments to the Monitoring the Future survey Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that starting January 1, 2026, the Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, along with other officials, must update the "Monitoring the Future" survey to include questions that track how young people use, perceive, and access fake or synthetic opioids, and whether they know if opioids they come across are counterfeit or synthetic.
503. Youth Risk Behavior Survey Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section instructs the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to work with experts to consider adding questions to the Youth Risk Behavior Survey about the use and awareness of fake or synthetic opioids, like fentanyl. It also suggests including ways to assess whether participants know if the opioids they use or come across are counterfeit or synthetic.
504. Evaluation of the effectiveness and reach of the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to evaluate the accuracy of a system that reports on synthetic opioid overdoses among high school students by 2025. Additionally, the Director must report findings and recommendations to Congress and funds are authorized for this purpose in fiscal year 2025.