Overview
Title
To promote democracy in Venezuela, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 37, also called the "VALOR Act of 2025," is a plan by the U.S. to help Venezuela become more democratic by using rules to support fair leadership, stop bad leaders from doing wrong things, and make sure the people get help they need.
Summary AI
S. 37, known as the "Venezuela Advancing Liberty, Opportunity, and Rights Act of 2025" or the "VALOR Act of 2025," aims to support the transition to democracy in Venezuela. The bill outlines U.S. policy to assist Venezuela's democratic change through diplomatic measures, including sanctions on the regime of Nicolas Maduro and support for Venezuelan human rights groups. It provides guidelines for lifting sanctions once a democratically elected government is established and includes provisions for international cooperation and humanitarian aid to the Venezuelan people. The Act also addresses supporting a democratic Venezuela's participation in international organizations and considers future economic relations with the country.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The Venezuela Advancing Liberty, Opportunity, and Rights Act of 2025, referred to as the VALOR Act of 2025, aims to promote democracy and uphold human rights in Venezuela. The bill seeks to support peaceful democratic transitions through sanctions against the current Maduro regime and any nondemocratic successors. It envisions broad diplomatic measures, including cooperation with international partners and U.S. financial institutions. Furthermore, it outlines steps to provide humanitarian assistance to the Venezuelan people while encouraging international entities to align with democratic principles in Venezuela.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues with the bill is the lack of clarity in determining when a democratically elected government is in power. The criteria and processes outlined are vague, leading to potential diplomatic challenges. Additionally, the sections on sanctions grant significant power to the President but lack clear guidelines, which could result in inconsistent application. Another concern is the ambiguity around what constitutes a "nondemocratic government," potentially leading to subjective interpretations. The section dealing with cryptocurrency sanctions lacks detail on enforcement, potentially hindering compliance.
The bill's provisions for lifting sanctions introduce complex procedures without clearly defined benchmarks for recognizing a democratically elected government, potentially delaying diplomatic normalization. Although the bill allows for support of democratic organizations in Venezuela, it lacks detailed criteria and accountability measures for overseeing these efforts. Moreover, the definitions surrounding sanctioned imports and "goods" are broad, possibly complicating enforcement and exception processes.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill might influence how the U.S. engages with Venezuela, affecting trade relations and diplomatic strategies. For the American public, there's a potential financial implication as the bill could lead to increased government spending to implement the outlined strategies, especially if it lacks clear budgetary restrictions. Moreover, changes in trade and diplomatic policies might affect sectors connected to international trade with Venezuela.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
The Venezuelan people could benefit from the humanitarian assistance provided, assuming effective implementation. Democratic groups within Venezuela may receive necessary support, potentially strengthening grassroots democratic efforts.
Negative Impacts:
For the U.S. government, there are challenges in overseeing the enforcement of sanctions and ensuring aid is properly allocated. The broad powers given to the President under the bill might raise concerns about potential overreach or lack of accountability. Additionally, American businesses involved in Venezuelan markets could face increased regulation and compliance requirements, affecting operational stability.
Stakeholders in the Inter-American region might benefit if there is successful support for democracy in Venezuela, promoting regional stability. Conversely, countries trading with Venezuela might encounter diplomatic and economic tensions if the U.S. sanctions affect their trade relations.
In conclusion, while the VALOR Act aims to support democratic change in Venezuela, several areas lack specificity and clarity, potentially leading to enforcement challenges and unintended consequences for various stakeholders. The bill's broad mandates necessitate careful oversight to ensure effective and accountable application of its measures.
Financial Assessment
The "Venezuela Advancing Liberty, Opportunity, and Rights Act of 2025" (S. 37) primarily focuses on promoting democracy in Venezuela and implementing associated policies and sanctions. Financial references within the bill are largely centered on allocations to support democracy-building initiatives and the imposition of sanctions.
Financial Allocations and Spending
One of the key financial components of the bill appears in Section 203, which pertains to the authorization of support for democratic and human rights groups in Venezuela. Here, the bill suggests that the President should ensure that at least $5,000,000 in voluntary contributions from the United States is directed to a special emergency fund created by the Organization of American States (OAS). This fund is intended for the deployment of human rights observers and election observation activities in Venezuela.
In Section 204, the bill authorizes the President to provide financial assistance through independent nongovernmental organizations for various projects in Venezuela. This includes humanitarian needs, education, and non-commercial development projects. The bill mandates the establishment of safeguards to ensure these funds do not benefit the Maduro regime but are utilized directly for the people of Venezuela.
Relation to Identified Issues
The bill's financial aspects relate to some of the identified issues. For instance, the authorization of support for democracy-building efforts, including the $5,000,000 allocation in Section 203, lacks detailed criteria for implementation and oversight. This could raise concerns about effective use and accountability of the allocated funds. The bill does not clearly outline mechanisms to ensure that funds are distributed effectively or detail any specific criteria for their allocation, as highlighted in the issues regarding the lack of detailed accountability mechanisms.
Furthermore, in Section 401, the bill discusses developing a plan for providing assistance to Venezuela. However, it does not detail the specific oversight mechanisms needed to ensure proper allocation and management of resources. The lack of clarity in the financial oversight for aid allocations could potentially result in mismanagement or misallocation of resources, aligning with the concerns raised about insufficient oversight mechanisms for financial aid and assistance.
Overall, while the bill outlines some financial commitments to support democratic processes in Venezuela, it lacks detailed provisions that ensure comprehensive oversight and accountability. This could lead to challenges in the effective utilization of funds to achieve the bill's objectives.
Issues
The bill's mechanisms for determining when a democratically elected government is in power in Venezuela (Sec. 101) lack specificity, particularly regarding the criteria and process, which could lead to ambiguities in implementation and diplomatic challenges.
The sanctions provisions (Sec. 302 and Sec. 303) grant broad discretionary power to the President without clear guidelines, resulting in potential inconsistencies or overreach in applying these sanctions, which may raise legal and diplomatic concerns.
The definition and criteria for 'nondemocratic government' are not clearly articulated (Secs. 201 and 302), leading to potential subjective interpretations and inconsistent enforcement across different institutions and scenarios.
The section on cryptocurrency sanctions (Sec. 304) lacks specificity on how transactions related to prohibited digital currencies will be determined and enforced, potentially hindering effective compliance and creating legal ambiguities.
The provisions for lifting sanctions (Sec. 306) present complex procedural requirements and lack clear criteria for what constitutes a 'democratically elected government,' potentially leading to confusion and delays in normalization efforts.
The authorization of support for democracy-building efforts in Venezuela (Sec. 203) is vague and lacks detailed criteria and accountability mechanisms, raising concerns about the effective use and oversight of allocated funds.
The provisions concerning importation exceptions and definitions of 'goods' (Sec. 502) could result in enforcement challenges due to broad definitions and exclusions, impacting the effectiveness of sanctions enforcement.
There is insufficient clarity on oversight and accountability for the implementation and penalties of the sanctions (Sec. 307), potentially leading to unchecked executive authority and insufficient legal recourse for affected entities.
The bill does not detail specific oversight mechanisms for financial aid and assistance to Venezuela (Sec. 401), creating potential risks of resource misallocation or mismanagement without proper checks and balances.
The process for reporting and reviewing trade and investment relations (Sec. 402) lacks a clear timeline and criteria, risking potential delays and inefficiencies in assessing and responding to trade barriers with Venezuela.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Venezuela Advancing Liberty, Opportunity, and Rights Act of 2025 (VALOR Act of 2025) is a proposed law aiming to promote democratic change and human rights in Venezuela. It includes measures like financial sanctions against the Maduro regime, support for Venezuelan democratic and human rights groups, and plans to assist the people of Venezuela, while also addressing the role of Venezuela in international organizations and financial institutions.
2. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The policy of the United States focuses on promoting a peaceful shift to democracy in Venezuela by supporting its people, using diplomatic efforts including sanctions on Maduro's regime, and encouraging global cooperation to achieve this goal. The policy also involves maintaining sanctions until progress towards democracy is shown, and potentially easing them in response to positive changes.
3. Appropriate congressional committees defined Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the term "appropriate congressional committees" refers to specific committees in the U.S. Congress: the Senate's Committee on Foreign Relations and Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the House of Representatives' Committee on Foreign Affairs and Committee on Financial Services.
101. Determinations of a democratically elected government in Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the criteria the U.S. President must use to determine if a democratically elected government is in power in Venezuela. These criteria include requirements such as holding free and fair elections, respecting human rights, releasing political prisoners, and not including Nicolas Maduro or individuals sanctioned or wanted by the U.S. government.
201. United States policy regarding participation of Venezuela in international financial institutions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes that the U.S. will oppose any representatives from Nicolas Maduro's government or any nondemocratic government from representing Venezuela in international financial institutions. Once a democratically elected government is in power, the U.S. will support its representation and will only back financial assistance that supports democracy in Venezuela.
202. United States policy regarding participation of Venezuela in the Organization of American States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the U.S. President must direct the United States' representative at the Organization of American States to oppose Venezuela's participation if its government is not democratic, until the President confirms to Congress that a democratic government is in power there.
203. Authorization of support for democratic and human rights groups and international observers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the President to support democracy-building efforts in Venezuela by providing help to individuals and independent organizations. It includes creating a fund through the Organization of American States for human rights and election observers and encourages other countries to support this initiative while ensuring no assistance goes to Venezuela's nondemocratic government.
Money References
- (2) VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS FOR FUND.—The President should provide not less than $5,000,000 of the voluntary contributions of the United States to the Organization of American States solely for the purposes of the special fund referred to in paragraph (1). (c) Action of other member states.—The President should instruct the United States Permanent Representative to the Organization of American States to encourage other member states of the Organization to join in calling for the Government of Venezuela to allow the immediate deployment of independent human rights monitors of the Organization of American States throughout Venezuela and on-site visits to Venezuela by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
204. Support for the people of Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The President is authorized to help Venezuelans by working with independent organizations on humanitarian projects like meeting basic needs, supporting democracy, education, non-commercial development, and environmental protection. To safeguard this support, the President must ensure it does not help the Maduro regime and is used only as intended for the Venezuelan people.
301. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, several important terms are defined. An "entity" refers to various types of groups such as partnerships and corporations. The "Government of Venezuela" covers the Venezuelan state and its agencies, and individuals tied to them, especially those connected to the regime of Nicolas Maduro. A "person" can be an individual or an entity, while a "United States person" includes U.S. citizens, residents, and entities under U.S. law.
302. Blocking international support for a nondemocratic government in Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines U.S. policy on restricting trade and credit with Venezuela due to its nondemocratic government. It allows the President to impose sanctions on countries aiding Venezuela, except for humanitarian aid, until a democratically elected government is in place.
303. Financial sanctions with respect to debt instruments of Maduro regime Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section prohibits U.S. individuals and entities from engaging in transactions involving debt instruments related to the Maduro regime in Venezuela, including specific types of debt issued by Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. and the Maduro regime, as well as certain financial activities, such as purchasing or pledging securities and accounts receivable. It also grants the U.S. Treasury the authority to implement regulations to enforce these prohibitions and mandates that all U.S. government agencies take measures within their power to uphold these rules.
304. Sanctions with respect to cryptocurrency and related technologies in Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines sanctions that prohibit U.S. individuals and entities from engaging in transactions involving digital currencies associated with the Venezuelan government under Nicolas Maduro. It gives authority to the Secretary of the Treasury to enforce these rules, potentially delegating responsibilities to other U.S. agencies.
305. Blocking property of the Government of Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the President to block and prohibit transactions involving property and interests in property of the Government of Venezuela and certain individuals or entities linked to them. This includes measures to prevent evasion of these prohibitions and allows the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to make rules and delegate authority to enforce these actions.
306. Termination of sanctions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section states that once a democratically elected government is established in Venezuela, the U.S. President must work to end sanctions. The President must notify Congress immediately and provide updates every 180 days for three years. If Congress disagrees, they can pass a "joint resolution of disapproval" to stop this action, with specific procedures in place for how it is handled in both the Senate and House of Representatives.
307. Implementation; penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The President has the authority to use powers from the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enforce this title, and anyone who breaks the rules may face penalties similar to those in the Act. Additionally, the President can waive penalties for foreign individuals if it is crucial for national security, with prior notice and explanation to Congress.
308. Report on specific licenses that authorize transactions with sanctioned persons Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of the Treasury, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to submit a report every 180 days to Congress for ten years, detailing specific licenses that allow transactions with sanctioned entities, including estimates of funds accessed by the Maduro regime due to these licenses. The report must include the names of entities with licenses, descriptions of authorized activities, and justifications for granting licenses, while ensuring business confidential information is protected as trade secrets.
309. Report on foreign persons doing business with the Maduro regime Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Secretary of State to deliver a report to Congress within 180 days, listing foreign individuals or entities engaging in significant transactions with the Venezuelan government or associated with those undermining democracy, committing human rights abuses, restricting freedom of expression, or involved in corruption in Venezuela. It also includes those operating in key sectors like mining and shipping, or offering significant support to those entities.
401. Assistance for the people of Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for the U.S. President to provide various forms of assistance to Venezuela under a democratically elected government, including food, medicine, and economic support. The plan requires coordination among U.S. agencies, reports to Congress, efforts to gain international support, and can only proceed with authorized funding.
402. Report on trade and investment relations between the United States and Venezuela Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the President to report to Congress about U.S. trade and investment relations with Venezuela once a democratically elected government is in power. The report should detail any barriers to trade and the U.S. policy goals regarding trade with Venezuela. Additionally, the President must consult with specific Congressional committees and seek advice from trade advisory committees on these policies.
501. Effect on lawful United States Government activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the Act does not stop any lawfully approved investigation or intelligence work carried out by U.S. government law enforcement or intelligence agencies.
502. Exception relating to importation of goods Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that the law does not require or allow sanctions to be imposed on importing goods. It also clarifies that a "good" includes any type of product or equipment, but not technical data.