Overview
Title
To require States to establish complete streets programs, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Complete Streets Act of 2024" wants to make streets safer for everyone—whether they walk, bike, drive, or use wheelchairs—by asking each State to make plans and get help to build streets that work well for all kinds of travel.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the "Complete Streets Act of 2024," requires States to create programs that make streets safer and more accessible for everyone, including people who walk, bike, drive, use public transit, or have disabilities. These programs will focus on designing roads that accommodate different types of traffic and modes of transportation. To achieve these goals, eligible local governments and organizations can apply for grants and technical assistance, and the U.S. Secretary of Transportation will establish guidelines and standards for complete street designs. The bill emphasizes the importance of improving safety and mobility in underserved communities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Complete Streets Act of 2024" aims to reshape the design and implementation of transportation infrastructure across the United States to ensure that it accommodates all users. This includes pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and individuals using public transit or freight. The bill mandates states to establish their own complete streets programs by providing technical assistance and competitive grants aimed at designing and constructing comprehensive road systems catering to a wide array of users.
General Summary of the Bill
The core objective of the Complete Streets Act of 2024 is to make streets safer and more accessible by integrating various modes of transportation into a unified system that caters to the diverse needs of the population. It brings into effect new design standards and calls for the creation of comprehensive policies at state and local levels. The legislation defines key terms related to transportation planning and identifies entities eligible for technical and financial assistance, aiming to eliminate gaps in infrastructure that currently undermine the mobility of nonmotorized and disadvantaged users.
Significant Issues
A key concern with the bill is the potential bureaucratic and administrative burdens it places on states. Requiring every state to develop a complete streets program without clear directives on expected outcomes can result in varying levels of effectiveness in program execution. Moreover, the wide definition of "eligible entity" could dilute funds, leading to oversight challenges and inefficiencies in financial distribution.
Additionally, the requirement of establishing complete streets design standards within 180 days might lead to incomplete or rushed developments, compromising the project's goals. The lack of a clear mechanism to measure the effectiveness of "complete streets" initiatives further complicates the consistent application across states, potentially leading to disparities in infrastructure quality and safety standards.
Concerns have also been raised about the potential for inequitable resource distribution, especially given that the proposed grant limitations might not adequately support large-scale projects in high-cost areas. Similarly, the allowance made for project-specific exemptions could result in deviations from the intended policy objectives if misinterpreted or over-applied.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the implementation of this bill stands to significantly improve the quality and accessibility of transportation infrastructure, particularly benefitting pedestrians, cyclists, and those reliant on public transit. By mandating more inclusive street designs, the public can expect enhanced road safety and increased convenience in navigating urban, suburban, and rural environments.
Specific stakeholders such as municipal governments, regional planning organizations, and transit agencies are likely to experience both positive and negative impacts. On one hand, they could benefit from increased funding and technical support to implement innovative transportation solutions. On the other hand, they may face challenges related to meeting the administrative demands and compliance requirements set forth by the legislation.
For community organizations and advocates for accessible transportation, the bill represents a significant step towards leveling the playing field for underserved populations. Meanwhile, state transportation departments might find themselves under pressure to adapt quickly to new standards and reporting requirements, impacting their overall operational effectiveness.
In conclusion, while the Complete Streets Act has the potential to revolutionize transportation systems across the United States by ensuring safety, accessibility, and efficiency, careful consideration and strategic implementation are necessary to mitigate the bill’s potential drawbacks and capitalize on its intended benefits.
Financial Assessment
The "Complete Streets Act of 2024" outlines several financial commitments aimed at encouraging States and eligible entities to develop safer and more accessible road systems for a wide range of users. These financial aspects have significant implications, considering the potential challenges identified within the bill's provisions.
Technical Assistance and Grants
One of the primary financial mechanisms in the bill is the allocation for technical assistance. Each State may provide up to $100,000 annually to eligible entities with approved complete streets policies. This funding is intended to aid in conducting studies or analyses necessary to develop a complete streets prioritization plan. Such grants are crucial for facilitating strategic planning; however, imposing a cap on this amount may not fully account for variations in project scope or complexity across different regions. This limitation could particularly impact areas where administrative and planning needs are greater, potentially leading to inefficiencies in program implementation.
Additionally, the bill provides for grants to be awarded to eligible entities for the design and construction of complete streets projects. These grants can cover up to $20,000,000 or 20 percent of a State's complete streets program funding yearly, whichever is lesser. While this financial support aims to encourage comprehensive infrastructure projects, the limit on funding size could hinder large-scale projects in high-cost areas, potentially exacerbating regional disparities in infrastructure quality. Hence, the financial allocation must be scrutinized to ensure equitable distribution that aligns with the project's needs.
Design Standards and Spending Responsibilities
A pressing concern within the bill is the establishment of design standards for complete streets. This section implicitly involves financial considerations, as developing and implementing these standards will require resources. The tight timeline of establishing these standards within 180 days may rush the process, possibly leading to incomplete guidelines that do not adequately consider various regional contexts.
Furthermore, the bill mandates each State to obligate 5 percent of specific federal funds to carry out their complete streets program annually. While this ensures a steady financial flow toward the initiative, it positions States to evaluate how best to allocate their budgets to meet these obligations without compromising other transportation funding priorities. The lack of a detailed roadmap for financial planning might lead to inconsistencies in how funds are allocated and used, aligning with the issues regarding administrative burdens and unclear outcome expectations.
Equity in Funding Distribution
The bill emphasizes equitable service provision for underserved communities, including low-income areas and communities of color. However, the structure of financial limitations and allocations raises concerns about whether these goals can be achieved comprehensively. The priority given to intersections and corridors identified as high risk for non-motorized users in funding decisions seeks to address safety concerns, yet it may not completely mitigate the disparities without substantial and targeted financial intervention.
In summary, the financial elements of the "Complete Streets Act of 2024" are critical to its aims of improving road safety and accessibility but come with challenges. These include ensuring equitable distribution of funding, meeting administrative requirements without undue burden, and crafting standards that align with diverse needs. As the bill progresses, careful consideration and possibly adjustments to these financial allocations will be necessary to ensure successful implementation and achieve the desired infrastructural improvements across States.
Issues
The requirement for States to establish a complete streets program may create significant administrative burdens without clear guidance on expected outcomes, as highlighted in Section 2. This could lead to logistical challenges and potential inefficiencies in program implementation.
The broad definition of 'eligible entity' in Section 2 might lead to a dilution of funds and difficulty in oversight. This could result in financial inefficiencies and challenges in ensuring accountability.
Section 4’s requirement to establish complete streets design standards within 180 days might lead to rushed or incomplete standards, possibly affecting the quality and safety of developments across different regions.
The benchmarks and guidance section in Section 2(c) lacks specificity on how effectiveness will be measured, which could result in inconsistencies in the implementation of complete streets programs across states, leading to disparities in transportation safety and accessibility.
The grant limitation outlined in Section 2(g)(2)(B) may not adequately support large-scale projects in high-cost areas, potentially leading to inequitable resource distribution and regional disparities in infrastructure development.
The term 'safe and adequate accommodation of all users' in Section 3 might be considered vague, as it does not specify how safety and adequacy are to be measured or defined. This ambiguity can lead to inconsistent safety standards across different states and regions.
Section 2(d)(4) allows for project-specific exemptions from complete streets policy, which could undermine the objectives of the policy due to the broad nature of the exemptions, opening them to subjective interpretation.
The complexity and extent of reporting requirements in Section 2(e)(1) may impose a significant workload on state transportation departments, potentially impacting their capacity to fulfill other duties and leading to bureaucratic inefficiencies.
The lack of a timeline for the implementation of safety standards in Section 3 could lead to delays and varied adoption rates among states, diminishing the overall effectiveness of the bill in enhancing transportation safety.
Section 2(i) calls for extensive updates to accessibility standards across multiple agencies, which might be challenging to align and implement cohesively, potentially delaying essential accessibility improvements.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be officially referred to as the “Complete Streets Act of 2024.”
2. Complete streets program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section creates a "Complete Streets Program" that requires U.S. states to develop road plans ensuring safe use for everyone, including pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. It defines key terms, explains program goals and requirements, and lays out funding and approval processes for designing and building streets that consider the needs of all users.
Money References
- (5) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING.—A State may provide not more than $100,000 in each fiscal year to an eligible entity with a complete streets policy approved by the applicable State or metropolitan planning organization to conduct studies or analyses to support the completion of a complete streets prioritization plan.
- (2) LIMITATION.—A grant provided to an eligible entity under paragraph (1) may be in an amount equal to the lesser of— (A) $20,000,000; and (B) 20 percent of the total amount of funding for the complete streets program of the State for the fiscal year. (h) Priority.—In selecting projects to receive grants under this section, the State shall give priority to projects on intersections and corridors in which nonmotorized users are most vulnerable, based on the most recent data and the evidence of risk.
3. Safety for users Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 1442 of the FAST Act requires that the Secretary ensures each state and metropolitan planning organization follows new safety standards. These standards are meant to make sure that all users, both motorized and nonmotorized, can safely and adequately use federal transportation projects at every stage, from planning to operation.
4. Complete Streets design standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes new "Complete Streets" design standards that must be established by the Secretary within 180 days after the Complete Streets Act of 2024 is enacted. These standards require bike lanes, sidewalks, and lighting for safety. Projects on eligible Federal-aid highways must comply with these standards within specified timelines unless exempt, such as emergency repairs or areas with no anticipated need. There are also provisions for appeals and reporting of compliance by states.
Money References
- “(B) PROJECTS DESCRIBED.—Except as provided in paragraph (4), a project referred to in subparagraph (A) is a new project— “(i) on a Federal-aid highway that— “(I) is within the boundaries of a metropolitan planning area; and “(II) has scheduled, fixed-route transit service; “(ii) that uses funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b); and “(iii)(I) for new construction or reconstruction; or “(II) with a total cost of more than $10,000,000. “
- “(C) PROJECTS DESCRIBED.—Except as provided in paragraph (4), a project referred to in subparagraph (A) is a new project— “(i) on a Federal-aid highway that is within the boundaries of a metropolitan planning area; “(ii) that uses funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b); and “(iii)(I) for new construction or reconstruction; or “(II) with a total cost of more than $10,000,000.