Overview

Title

To require executive branch employees to report certain royalties, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill, called the "Royalty Transparency Act," wants people who work for the government to tell everyone if they get money from special ideas they created at work, and this information will be shared online. It's like when you invent something cool at school, and you must let the teacher know, so all your friends can see too!

Summary AI

S. 3664, titled the "Royalty Transparency Act," is a legislative bill requiring executive branch employees to disclose royalties they receive from inventions developed during their government employment. It mandates that these disclosures, including those related to contractors and grantees, be made publicly available online while providing a mechanism for unredacted copies to be furnished to Members of Congress upon request. The bill also involves regular reviews and reports about these financial disclosures to ensure transparency and prevent organizational conflicts of interest in federal acquisitions.

Published

2024-09-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-09-09
Package ID: BILLS-118s3664rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
8
Words:
3,756
Pages:
20
Sentences:
37

Language

Nouns: 1,054
Verbs: 271
Adjectives: 133
Adverbs: 29
Numbers: 189
Entities: 194

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.18
Average Sentence Length:
101.51
Token Entropy:
5.07
Readability (ARI):
52.40

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Royalty Transparency Act," aims to increase transparency regarding royalties received by executive branch employees and entities seeking federal grants or contracts. Introduced in the 118th Congress, this bill mandates comprehensive reporting and disclosure procedures for such royalties, with several provisions to ensure these disclosures are accessible to Congress and, to some extent, to the public.

General Summary of the Bill

The "Royalty Transparency Act" requires executive branch employees, including specific members of advisory committees, to disclose royalties they receive from inventions developed during their government employment. The bill encompasses amendments to U.S. law to ensure these disclosures are publicly available online. Additionally, it extends similar transparency requirements to individuals and organizations applying for federal funding and mandates the disclosure of all royalties received in the decade preceding their application. The bill also establishes mechanisms for reporting potential conflicts of interest in federal acquisitions related to royalty payments.

Summary of Significant Issues

A primary issue highlighted in the bill is the requirement for extensive publication of financial disclosures, which may raise privacy concerns. Disclosing royalties received by government employees and their families can expose sensitive information, potentially impacting personal and financial privacy. Furthermore, the bill demands a comprehensive 10-year disclosure of royalties from federal grant or contract applicants, which might present substantial burdens, particularly for smaller organizations or individual applicants.

Another critical issue pertains to the procedures for releasing unredacted reports to Congress, which could pose security risks if personal information is not adequately protected. The use of legal jargon and references to other statutes could also limit public understanding of the bill's implications.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill could enhance transparency in government operations, aiding public confidence in how federal employees and contractors manage conflicts of interest. By requiring the disclosure of royalties and potential conflicts of interest, the legislation seeks to ensure accountability and ethical conduct within the executive branch and among federal contractors.

However, the increased transparency might inadvertently lead to privacy invasions for individuals subject to these disclosures, which could deter talented professionals from government service due to concerns about exposing their financial details.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Government Employees: The bill could have a chilling effect on government employees who derive income from innovation, as they might view the required disclosures as intrusive. This might particularly affect those employees who are developing invaluable governmental technologies and be wary of how their financial interests are managed and perceived.

Federal Grant and Contract Applicants: Entities applying for federal aid may find the royalty disclosure requirements daunting. The burden of tracking and reporting royalties over a decade could prove especially cumbersome and costly for smaller organizations, possibly discouraging them from seeking federal opportunities.

Transparency Advocates: This group will likely view the bill favorably, as it could ensure that government operations are conducted transparently, maintaining public trust in government actions and reducing perceived corruption.

Privacy Rights Advocates: They could be concerned about the extensive data publication requirements, emphasizing the need for stronger privacy protections to prevent misuse of personal and financial information.

Overall, the "Royalty Transparency Act" provides a framework for increasing accountability but must carefully balance transparency with the protection of individual rights and considerations for administrative burden. The legislation's potential effects on various stakeholders underscore the complexities involved in policymaking that seeks to enhance government transparency while safeguarding privacy and operational efficiency.

Issues

  • The requirement for executive branch employees to disclose royalties, including those received by their spouses or dependents, could raise privacy concerns and potential ethical issues, especially considering these disclosures will be published online. (Sections 2 and 3)

  • The procedure for releasing unredacted financial reports to Members of Congress within 30 days could pose privacy and security risks if sensitive information is inadequately protected. (Sections 2 and 3)

  • The requirement for applicable persons to disclose covered royalties for a 10-year period before receiving a federal grant or contract may be overly burdensome and could discourage smaller entities or individuals from seeking federal funding. (Section 3)

  • The bill mandates extensive publication of reports and financial disclosures online, which, while promoting transparency, might not fully account for the need to protect sensitive personal information adequately. (Sections 2 and 3)

  • The complexity and legal jargon used throughout the bill, such as references to other acts and frequent use of 'notwithstanding,' might make it challenging for the general public to understand the bill's full implications. (Sections 2 and 3)

  • The absence of specific protocols or timelines for notifying Congress about waivers could lead to inconsistent reporting and oversight issues. (Section 2)

  • There is no clear guidance on what constitutes a 'request' from a Member of Congress, which could lead to varied interpretations and potential delays in furnishing reports. (Sections 2 and 3)

  • The broad language regarding the determination of advisory committees by the Government Accountability Office might result in more committees being included than initially intended. (Section 2)

  • The requirement for agencies to report annually on conflict of interest reviews related to royalty payments lacks clarity on what should be done with collected data or how it will be used effectively. (Section 3)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act is called the "Short title." It states that the official name of the act is the "Royalty Transparency Act."

2. Financial disclosure reports of executive branch employees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines amendments to financial disclosure report requirements for executive branch employees. It mandates the disclosure and online publication of royalty income from inventions made during government employment, requires unredacted reports to be shared with Congress upon request, and specifies that special Government employees' confidential financial disclosure reports must be redacted and published after removing sensitive personal information, excluding royalty details.

3. General disclosure of royalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text requires individuals or entities applying for federal grants or contracts to report any royalties they have received from other sources in the past 10 years. Additionally, agencies must provide Congress with these unredacted reports within 30 days if requested.

4. Severability Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

If any part of this Act or its amendments is found to be unconstitutional, the rest of the Act and its amendments will still continue to be valid and enforceable.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section says the official name of the law is the "Royalty Transparency Act."

2. Financial disclosure reports of executive branch employees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the bill amends various provisions of U.S. law to require executive branch employees, especially those involved in certain advisory committees, to file detailed financial disclosure reports. It mandates transparency in reporting royalties received by these employees, facilitates the publication of these disclosures on government websites, and specifies procedures for agency reporting to Congress.

3. Preventing organizational conflicts of interest in Federal acquisition Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section directs the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and the Office of Management and Budget to ensure conflict of interest reviews for potential contractors or grantees include examining royalties paid in the previous year. It requires agencies to report annually to Congress on cases of potential conflicts involving royalty payments and the actions taken to address them.

4. Severability Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

If any part of the Act or its amendments is found to be unconstitutional, the rest of the Act and its amendments still remain valid and enforceable.