Overview
Title
To prohibit a drawdown and sale of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve if the President has withdrawn certain land from oil and gas leasing, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill says that if the President stops certain lands from being used to get oil and gas, then the government can't sell oil from its special emergency storage unless there is a really big problem, like a war or a natural disaster.
Summary AI
S. 3655 is a bill that aims to stop the selling and reduction of petroleum products from the United States' Strategic Petroleum Reserve if the President has recently stopped certain areas of land from being leased for oil and gas production. The bill outlines that this restriction does not apply if the land withdrawal was enacted by Congress or in the case of an urgent energy supply crisis caused by sabotage, war, terrorism, or natural disasters. It also assigns the Inspector General of the Department of the Interior to determine and publish if such land withdrawals have taken place.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the “Strategically Lowering Gas Prices Act,” aims to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act by setting restrictions on when the U.S. government can use its Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Specifically, it prohibits the sale of petroleum from this reserve if the President or other designated officials have withdrawn certain lands from oil and gas leasing. This restriction is subject to exceptions for emergencies caused by sabotage, war, terrorism, or natural disasters. Notably, withdrawals directed by Congress are not considered under these restrictions.
Significant Issues
Several important issues arise from this bill. Firstly, the title—"Strategically Lowering Gas Prices Act"—may mislead the public as it does not clearly explain how these measures will achieve lower gas prices. Without more context, it is challenging to understand the strategy behind this legislative intent. Secondly, the legal complexity of the language within the bill, particularly regarding “withdrawal of lands,” may prove difficult for the average reader to comprehend. This obscurity can hinder public understanding of legislative implications. Moreover, the term "act of God" used in describing exceptions is not defined, leading to potential varied interpretations and uncertainties in legal application. Additionally, the unspecified "mineral leasing laws" introduce ambiguity that may concern those reliant on precise regulatory guidance.
Impact on the Public
For the public, this bill could influence how gas prices fluctuate in the future. By restricting the use of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, this bill may potentially lead to increased gas prices if certain lands are withdrawn from oil and gas production. Conversely, should the withdrawal of lands be strategically executed, it could reflect an effort to maintain environmental standards or preserve public lands, which aligns with broader ecological and social interests.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The implications of this legislation may vary across different stakeholders. Environmental groups might view the potential restriction on oil and gas leases and subsequent withdrawal from certain lands as favorable, promoting conservation efforts. However, stakeholders in the energy sector, including oil and gas companies, might see these restrictions as a barrier to resource extraction and economic opportunities. Moreover, the lack of oversight or checking mechanisms regarding the withdrawals exercised by high-level officials may raise ethical concerns, as this power, without explicit checks, could be perceived as overly authoritative, impacting governance transparency.
Overall, while the intent behind the "Strategically Lowering Gas Prices Act" may target balancing fuel reserves with land conservation, its ambiguous language and lack of clear scope regarding oversight might leave critical interpretations open until further clarified or interpreted through application.
Issues
The title 'Strategically Lowering Gas Prices Act' is potentially misleading, as Section 1 does not provide any information on how the Act intends to lower gas prices, leaving its implications unclear to the public.
Section 2 contains complex legal language, such as 'Effect of withdrawal of lands,' that may be difficult for the general public to understand, necessitating simplification for broader comprehension and transparency.
The definition of 'an act of God' in Section 2 is vague and could lead to varying interpretations, creating uncertainties in its application.
Section 2 does not specify which 'mineral leasing laws' are applicable, causing ambiguity and potential legal uncertainties which might be a concern for stakeholders reliant on clear regulatory guidance.
There is no provision for oversight or checks in Section 2 to ensure that withdrawals by the President or other high-level officials are justified, raising potential ethical or governance concerns about the unchecked exercise of executive power.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official name of this legislation is the “Strategically Lowering Gas Prices Act”.
2. Drawdown and sale of petroleum products Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary from drawing down and selling petroleum from the Reserve if the President or certain officials have withdrawn land from oil and gas leasing, unless the withdrawal is due to a severe energy crisis caused by sabotage, war, terrorism, or natural disasters. A withdrawal by Congress is not considered a withdrawal by the President.