Overview
Title
To improve the President's Cup Cybersecurity Competitions.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a cool competition where people can practice keeping computers safe from hackers even better. It also sets rules for how money can be spent and how long the competition can go on.
Summary AI
The bill titled "Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Competition Act" aims to improve the President's Cup Cybersecurity Competitions. It proposes amendments to Section 7121 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 to enhance cybersecurity competitions by including categories on offensive and defensive cyber operations, focusing on information and operational technologies. Additionally, it limits spending to 20% of the competition's budget on various expenses and sets a sunset clause that ends the competition program five years after the enactment of the bill without additional funding.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Competition Act" has been introduced in the United States Congress with the aim to improve the President's Cup Cybersecurity Competitions. This legislation focuses on enhancing the structure and contents of these competitions to better prepare participants for current cybersecurity challenges.
General Summary
The bill proposes amendments to a previous act to restructure and expand the range of skills tested in cybersecurity competitions. One of the major changes is the requirement for biennial (every second competition) categories focusing on offensive and defensive cyber operations that cover information technology, operational technology, and industrial control systems. The bill also places a cap on certain expenditures related to the competitions, requires a report submission before the next competition, and includes a provision that ends the authority to hold these competitions after five years unless further action is taken.
Significant Issues
A few issues have surfaced regarding the prescribed changes and restrictions in the bill. Firstly, requiring specific categories to be incorporated every second competition may limit the competition's ability to adapt to new and emerging cybersecurity threats. The bill also grants broad discretion to one individual, the Director, to decide which additional technological systems should be focused on, which could misalign with national priorities. The cap of 20 percent on various expenses may be restrictive, potentially limiting the competition’s ability to allocate resources efficiently. Furthermore, the mandated reporting before holding another competition could delay important cybersecurity initiatives due to potential bureaucratic slowdowns. Finally, while the bill outlines the scope and structure of the competitions, it does not clarify who will organize and oversee them, leading to potential ambiguities in implementation.
Public Impact
This bill could have mixed impacts on the public. By refining and expanding the cybersecurity competitions, it aims to strengthen the nation's readiness against cyber threats, which is crucial in an increasingly digital world. This effort could enhance the quality and relevance of training for cybersecurity professionals, potentially improving cyber defenses across public and private sectors.
However, the restrictions and requirements laid out in the bill might also lead to inefficiencies. For instance, the cap on expenses and prescriptive content could inhibit comprehensive competition development and innovation. The five-year sunset clause might offer insufficient time for long-term planning and consistent improvement of these critical competitions.
Impact on Stakeholders
Cybersecurity Professionals: This bill could provide enhanced training and skill development opportunities, which are essential for professionals in the field. However, the structured nature of the competitions could limit the breadth of skills tested, potentially leaving out some emerging areas in cybersecurity.
Government Agencies: Agencies responsible for organizing and overseeing the competitions might face challenges due to the lack of clarity regarding responsibilities and restrictions on resource allocation. The need for timely report submissions could add another layer of bureaucracy, potentially delaying necessary updates to the competitions.
Public Sector Entities: An improved cybersecurity talent pool could benefit public sector entities by bolstering organizational defenses against cyber threats. Yet, the limitations imposed by the bill could reduce the effectiveness of these competitions to adapt swiftly to new challenges.
Overall, while the bill aims to improve cybersecurity readiness through structured competitions, attention needs to be paid to its restrictions and the potential need for flexibility and adaptive strategies in the rapidly evolving realm of cybersecurity.
Issues
The requirement for biennial incorporation of specific categories of offensive and defensive cyber operations in Section 2, notably in subparagraph (A), might be too prescriptive, limiting flexibility and focus on emerging cybersecurity priorities.
The director's broad discretion to determine 'any other category of technological system requiring cybersecurity or information security' in Section 2, subparagraph (C) can lead to overly broad interpretations and potential misalignment with national cybersecurity priorities.
The limit of 20 percent for various expenses delineated in Section 2, subsection (e)(1) might be restrictive, potentially hampering the competition's ability to allocate resources effectively and adapt swiftly as needed.
The 'Limitation' clause in Section 2, subsection (h) requires a report submission before conducting another competition, which can introduce bureaucratic delays, potentially delaying important cybersecurity talent development efforts.
The 'Sunset' clause in Section 2, subsection (i) limits the authority to conduct competitions to five years, which might undermine long-term strategic development in enhancing national cybersecurity capabilities.
The bill lacks explicit designation of responsible entities for organizing and overseeing the competitions, leading to potential ambiguities in implementation as highlighted in Section 2.
The complexity of sentence structures and cross-referencing within Section 2 might make it difficult for laypersons to comprehend effectively, potentially hindering public understanding and engagement.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the name of the Act is the "Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Competition Act".
2. President's Cup Cybersecurity Competitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the amendment to the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, changes are made to the structure of cybersecurity competitions, including the removal of a paragraph, the redesignation of others, and new rules mandating that every second competition include categories that demonstrate skills in offensive and defensive cyber operations involving information and operational technology, industrial control systems, or other relevant technological systems.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill specifies that it will be called the "Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Competition Act."
2. President's Cup Cybersecurity Competitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill makes changes to the cybersecurity competitions outlined in the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act. It sets new requirements for the competitions to include various cybersecurity skills, limits the competition's funding to not exceed 20% of the available amounts for various activities, and states that no annual competition can be held until a report from the previous year's competition is submitted. Additionally, the authority to conduct these competitions will expire five years after the enactment of this Act, and no new funding will be provided for these amendments.