Overview

Title

To allow certain Federal minerals to be mined consistent with the Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill S. 362 lets people dig out certain kinds of rocks called coal from a special area in Montana, and it tells a big boss called the Secretary of the Interior to say yes without thinking twice about it.

Summary AI

S. 362 is a bill that allows certain federal minerals to be mined in accordance with the Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification. It defines the term "Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification" and authorizes the mining of specific federal coal reserves located in Montana within an identified area of 800 acres. The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to approve this mining plan without changes or delays.

Published

2025-02-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-03
Package ID: BILLS-119s362is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
394
Pages:
2
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 148
Verbs: 25
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 22
Entities: 43

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.25
Average Sentence Length:
39.40
Token Entropy:
4.66
Readability (ARI):
21.74

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

S. 362 is a piece of legislation introduced in the United States Congress on February 3, 2025. The bill, presented by Senator Daines and co-sponsored by Senator Sheehy, aims to authorize the mining of certain Federal minerals in the Bull Mountains region of Montana. This authorization is based on a modification of the Bull Mountains Mining Plan, specifically Amendment 3 related to Federal Coal Lease MTM 97988. The bill directs that mining operations be approved without modification or delay by the Secretary of the Interior, focusing on a designated area within Musselshell County, Montana.

Significant Issues

The bill raises several significant issues. Firstly, it mandates the immediate approval of the mining plan without room for further review or public input. This directive raises concerns about due process and transparency, as it potentially bypasses public participation and scrutiny, crucial elements in democratic processes. Secondly, the bill lacks mention of any environmental oversight or regulations, which could lead to environmental degradation of the region. This omission is critical given the increasing focus on sustainable and environmentally friendly practices. Thirdly, economic considerations are overlooked as the bill does not discuss any financial terms, such as royalty payments, which represents a potential loss of revenue for the federal government. Finally, the enforcement of the approval directive is not clearly assigned, potentially leading to compliance challenges and legal ambiguities.

Potential Public Impact

The bill's passage could impact the public both broadly and specifically. Broadly, the lack of public input and environmental oversight could set a concerning precedent for the approval of mining activities on federal land. The absence of financial terms might also affect government revenues and by extension, public services funded by such revenues. Specifically, residents and stakeholders in the Bull Mountains region, including environmental advocates, may be directly impacted by potential environmental consequences and changes in land use.

Impact on Stakeholders

Different stakeholders would be affected by this bill in varied ways. Environmental Groups might view the bill negatively due to its lack of environmental safeguards and the potential for ecological harm. They are likely to oppose the bill and could mobilize public opinion and legal actions against it. Local Communities, particularly those in Musselshell County, could face both potential economic benefits from mining activities and risks related to environmental degradation and changes to their local environment. Government Agencies, like the Department of the Interior, are tasked with implementing the bill without modification, which could limit their ability to enforce environmental regulations and manage public lands effectively. The Mining Industry may welcome the bill as it streamlines the authorization process, potentially reducing operational bottlenecks and allowing for expanded resource extraction in the region.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to facilitate mining activities in a specific area, its broader implications regarding environmental stewardship, public participation, and fiscal management raise complex challenges that merit careful consideration by policymakers and the public alike.

Issues

  • The bill, particularly in Section 1, mandates the Secretary of the Interior to approve the Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification without modification or delay, which limits the opportunity for further review or public input. This raises potential concerns about due process and transparency in governmental procedures and may provoke public or legal scrutiny.

  • Section 1 does not specify any environmental or regulatory oversight for the mining activities authorized, which may lead to significant environmental impact concerns. The lack of environmental considerations could lead to opposition from environmental groups and the general public who are concerned about natural resource management.

  • There is no mention of financial terms such as royalty payments or compensation for mining Federal coal reserves in Section 1, which could represent a significant loss of potential revenue for the government. This financial omission might raise issues regarding the responsible management of public resources.

  • The enforcement responsibility of the mining plan approval, as directed in Section 1, is ambiguous. Without clarification of enforcement mechanisms, this could lead to compliance challenges and potential legal disputes over the responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior.

  • The language in Section 1 includes specific legal terms such as 'Federal Coal Lease MTM 97988' without providing context for a general audience. This might impede understanding and accessibility of the bill for the public and non-expert stakeholders, which could hinder informed public discussion or decision-making.

  • The definition of 'Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification' in Section 1 is specific to a memorandum but does not explain its broader implications or effects beyond approval. This lack of clarity could create ambiguity regarding future actions or modifications needed, leading to potential legal or procedural confusion.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Authorization to mine Federal minerals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the term "Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification" refers to a specific amendment for coal mining that was approved in 2020. It allows mining on certain federal lands in Montana without delay or changes, and the Secretary of the Interior is required to approve the mining plan within 30 days of this law being passed.