Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the deduction for medical expenses.

ELI5 AI

S. 3607 is a bill that says when people are doing their taxes, they can't count the money they spend on an abortion as a medical cost they get a discount on, unless it's to save the mom's life or because of bad things like rape. It would start working when the bill becomes a law.

Summary AI

S. 3607 proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that money spent on an abortion cannot be included when calculating medical expenses for tax deductions. However, there are exceptions if the abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. This Act, titled the “Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2024,” would take effect for taxable years beginning after its enactment.

Published

2024-01-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-01-17
Package ID: BILLS-118s3607is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
405
Pages:
2
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 114
Verbs: 36
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 13
Entities: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.92
Average Sentence Length:
27.00
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
13.91

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It specifically aims to exclude expenses related to abortions from being deductible as medical expenses for tax purposes. Exceptions are included for situations where the procedure is necessary to save a woman's life or when the pregnancy results from rape or incest. If passed, this amendment would apply to taxable years starting after the law is enacted.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues have been identified within the bill's provisions. Primarily, the title itself, "Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2024," may be perceived as controversial, as it frames the issue of abortion in a particular light that could be divisive. Section 2 of the bill could be viewed as imposing a financial penalty on those who seek abortions, except in narrowly defined circumstances, potentially raising ethical concerns about fairness and equity.

A notable concern is the lack of clarity on how exceptions, such as abortions required to save a woman's life or resulting from rape or incest, will be verified or certified. This absence of detail may lead to ambiguities and inconsistencies in the law's application. Additionally, the effective date of the amendment remains unclear, which could complicate its implementation and enforcement.

Impact on the Public Broadly

If enacted, this bill could significantly impact how individuals manage their healthcare finances, particularly those who undergo abortions. By disallowing the deductibility of most abortion-related expenses, the bill could increase the financial burden on individuals who opt for the procedure, potentially influencing personal healthcare decisions. The bill might disproportionately affect those with lower incomes who are less able to absorb additional medical expenses.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Certain stakeholders are likely to experience specific impacts from this legislation. Individuals seeking abortions for reasons other than those specified in the bill might face increased financial constraints, as the costs of the procedure may no longer qualify for medical expense deductions, barring the defined exceptions.

Healthcare providers and professionals, particularly those involved in reproductive health, may also encounter administrative challenges. The absence of a clear certification process for exceptions could lead to increased scrutiny and complexity in how they document and validate the necessity of certain procedures.

By contrast, some proponents of restricting abortion-related services might view this bill as aligning with their interests, as it may act as a deterrent to seeking abortions. However, the broader social and ethical implications of limiting medical deductions could lead to increased polarization on this sensitive issue.

Overall, the bill has the potential to affect various segments of the population and stakeholders differently, underscoring the importance of thorough consideration by lawmakers and the public to address its many nuances and implications.

Issues

  • The bill's short title, 'Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2024', could be seen as controversial and divisive, potentially framing the debate in a specific way that might not align with all perspectives, which relates to Section 1.

  • Section 2 could be interpreted as financially penalizing individuals who seek abortions, except under specific circumstances, raising ethical concerns about fairness and equity, particularly affecting low-income individuals who may not be able to absorb additional medical expenses.

  • The bill fails to specify how exceptions are to be verified or certified, especially concerning physician declarations and incidents of rape or incest, leading to potential ambiguities and inconsistencies in how the law might be applied, as outlined in Section 2.

  • The effective date of the amendment is not clearly defined beyond being after enactment, raising potential issues regarding its implementation and enforcement timing, as noted in Section 2.

  • The language and references to the Internal Revenue Code might be complex for laypersons, potentially leading to misunderstandings without additional context or explanation on how the deductions are altered, which could lower public comprehension as noted in Section 2.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that this Act will be officially known as the "Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2024."

2. Amounts paid for abortion not taken into account in determining deduction for medical expenses Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Internal Revenue Code to specify that amounts paid for abortions are generally not deductible as medical expenses for tax purposes, except in cases where the abortion is necessary to save the woman's life or if the pregnancy results from rape or incest. This amendment applies to taxable years beginning after the law is enacted.