Overview

Title

To award grants to States to establish or improve, and carry out, Seal of Biliteracy programs to recognize high-level student proficiency in speaking, reading, and writing in both English and a second language, and early language programs.

ELI5 AI

This bill is about giving money to states so they can give special awards to students who are really good at speaking, reading, and writing in English and another language. The goal is to help more students learn different languages and be proud of it!

Summary AI

S. 3595 aims to provide grants to U.S. states to create or enhance Seal of Biliteracy programs, which recognize students who achieve high proficiency in English and another language, including Native American and classical languages like Latin or Greek. The bill outlines criteria for student eligibility and requires states to report on program implementation. It also includes measures to ensure accessibility for students with disabilities and English learners, and plans for outreach and education about these programs. The bill authorizes $10 million in funding annually from 2024 to 2028 to support these initiatives.

Published

2024-01-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-01-17
Package ID: BILLS-118s3595is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,959
Pages:
10
Sentences:
44

Language

Nouns: 563
Verbs: 168
Adjectives: 125
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 65
Entities: 138

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.36
Average Sentence Length:
44.52
Token Entropy:
5.17
Readability (ARI):
24.81

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The legislation titled "Biliteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act" or the “BEST Act” aims to promote language proficiency in both English and a second language among students in the United States. Introduced to the 118th Congress, the bill proposes awarding grants to states to establish or enhance Seal of Biliteracy programs. The goal of these programs is to acknowledge and certify high-level student proficiency in speaking, reading, and writing in two languages. Proficiency in Native American languages is also recognized. The bill authorizes competitive grants for a two-year period, renewable at the discretion of the Secretary of Education, and allocates $10 million annually from 2024 through 2028 for these initiatives.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues in the bill may merit consideration:

  1. Grant Renewal Discretion: The provision allowing grant renewals at the Secretary of Education's discretion may lack transparency and accountability, potentially leading to favoritism or unequal distribution of funds.

  2. State Grant Limitation: Limiting one grant per state at one time could disadvantage larger states with more complex linguistic needs, potentially affecting their ability to serve diverse communities effectively.

  3. Definition Clarity: The bill's definition of a "classical language" is noted as somewhat ambiguous, referencing languages "no longer spoken," yet such languages often remain in use for cultural or religious purposes.

  4. Fund Management Pressure: The requirement for states to return unspent grant funds within six months might create unnecessary pressure, possibly leading to inefficient resource use.

  5. Equitable Access Concerns: Although the bill highlights the importance of equitable access, it does not sufficiently address barriers that could obstruct a uniform implementation across different states, potentially disadvantaging under-resourced communities.

Potential Impact on the Broader Public

The bill underscores the importance of bilingualism, which aligns with broader educational goals of preparing students for a globalized economy. By institutionalizing recognition for language proficiency, the legislation may encourage more students to pursue language studies, potentially leading to cognitive, educational, and economic benefits. Given the potential to enhance job prospects and cultural understanding, the broad public may see a long-term positive impact, contributing to national economic growth and social cohesion.

Specific Stakeholder Impact

  • Students: Those who achieve the Seal of Biliteracy could gain a competitive edge in higher education and the job market. Students from diverse linguistic backgrounds might feel more valued and acknowledged, fostering a sense of pride and achievement.

  • Educational Institutions: Schools may need to adapt curricula and assessments to meet the program's requirements, which could require additional resource allocation. However, the program might motivate schools to innovate and expand language education offerings.

  • State Educational Authorities: With the grant-based approach, states are incentivized to develop policies and resources to support language acquisition. However, they must navigate the potential challenge of equitable distribution of funds and program accessibility.

  • Native American Communities: The inclusion of Native American languages is a welcoming recognition of cultural heritage, promoting the preservation and revitalization of these languages.

Overall, while the bill has promising elements to enhance language education nationwide, careful attention to transparency, equitable implementation, and clear definitions will be crucial to realizing its full potential and ensuring that all stakeholders benefit.

Financial Assessment

The bill, titled the Biliteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act or BEST Act, involves financial allocations to support the establishment and enhancement of Seal of Biliteracy programs across U.S. states. These programs aim to recognize students who have achieved high proficiency in English and an additional language.

Financial Summary

The bill authorizes an appropriation of $10 million annually from 2024 through 2028. This funding is designated for grants that states can use to create, improve, and operate these biliteracy programs.

Allocation and Use of Funds

The financial appropriations are intended to be used for:

  • Administrative costs related to setting up or improving Seal of Biliteracy programs.
  • Public outreach and education initiatives to inform students, parents, and educational institutions about the availability and benefits of the Seal of Biliteracy.
  • Providing subgrants to local educational agencies. These subgrants are for professional development for language educators, outreach efforts, and subsidizing the costs of baseline and final Seal of Biliteracy testing, especially for low-income students.

Relation to Identified Issues

The bill touches on several financial and distribution issues as noted:

  1. Grant Renewal Process: The renewal of grants is left to the discretion of the Secretary of Education, which raises concerns about potential favoritism or unequal distribution of funds. This concern highlights the importance of a transparent and accountable renewal process to ensure fair allocation of federal resources.

  2. One Grant Per State Limitation: Each state is allowed only one grant at a time, which could disadvantage larger states with diverse linguistic populations. These larger states might require more resources to adequately support all communities, and the single grant limitation might therefore be insufficient.

  3. Return of Unspent Funds: States must return any unspent grant funds within six months after the grant term ends. This requirement could inadvertently pressure states into spending funds quickly, potentially leading to inefficient use and hastened decisions that do not maximize the program's effectiveness.

  4. Equitable Access Challenges: While the bill appropriates funds, it doesn't thoroughly address potential barriers to access for disadvantaged students across various states and school districts. These barriers include varying resources and linguistic diversity, which could affect the implementation and reach of the programs.

The financial structure outlined in the bill attempts to provide a substantial foundation for recognizing biliteracy proficiency across the nation. However, the issues related to the allocation and management of these funds underscore the complexities involved in ensuring that the intended benefits of the Seal of Biliteracy program are realized equitably across different regions and populations.

Issues

  • The clause allowing for grant renewal at the discretion of the Secretary in Section 4 could lead to a lack of transparency and accountability in the renewal process, potentially resulting in favoritism or unequal distribution of funds.

  • The restriction in Section 4 of only allowing one grant per State at any one time might disadvantage larger states with more diverse linguistic needs, potentially hindering their ability to adequately serve all linguistic communities within their borders.

  • The definition of 'classical language' in Section 3 is somewhat ambiguous, as it refers to 'a language that is no longer spoken,' which may be unclear since some classical languages are still spoken by communities today for cultural or liturgical purposes.

  • The requirement in Section 4 for States to return unspent grant funds within 6 months after the end of the term might create pressure on States to spend funds unnecessarily to avoid returning them, potentially leading to inefficient use of resources.

  • Potential barriers to equitable access to a Seal of Biliteracy program are not thoroughly addressed in Section 2, and this may impact implementation across different states and schools, particularly for disadvantaged students.

  • There is an assumption in Section 2 that all students across the country would have equal access to a Seal of Biliteracy program, which may not be feasible due to variations in resources and linguistic diversity across states.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the name of the law is the “Biliteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act” or simply the “BEST Act.”

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress recognizes the importance of language education and bilingual proficiency, highlighting its benefits for cognitive development, academic achievement, and economic opportunities. Various states have successfully implemented programs, such as the Seal of Biliteracy, to acknowledge students' multilingual skills and encourage others to pursue proficiency in multiple languages.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including references to the meanings given by other laws and acts. It explains terms like "classical language", listing languages such as Greek and Latin, defines what counts as a "second language", which can include sign languages, and clarifies who the "Secretary" refers to as the Secretary of Education.

4. Grants for State Seal of Biliteracy programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section establishes a program for awarding competitive grants to states to create or improve Seal of Biliteracy programs, which recognize students who are proficient in English and a second language, including Native American languages. The program outlines criteria for student proficiency, requires equitable access for students with disabilities, and prohibits charging students fees for participation. The grants can be used for administrative costs, public outreach, and supporting educators, with $10 million authorized annually for 2024-2028.

Money References

  • (f) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.