Overview

Title

Making appropriations to improve border security, imposing new reporting requirements relating to border security, and enhancing criminal penalties for destroying or evading border controls.

ELI5 AI

The bill is like a plan to make the borders safer by hiring more helpers and getting better gadgets to catch bad things like illegal drugs. It also makes rules tougher if someone tries to break the border rules, like sneaking past without permission.

Summary AI

S. 3591, introduced in the U.S. Senate, proposes financial support to enhance border security measures. It allocates funds for the Department of Homeland Security to hire more personnel, improve technology for inspecting vehicles and detecting illegal drugs like fentanyl, and strengthens penalties for damaging or bypassing border controls. The bill also includes funding for agencies like the Drug Enforcement Administration and U.S. Customs and Border Protection to disrupt drug trafficking networks and improve operational capabilities. Additionally, it requires reports on the impact of new border patrol initiatives and infrastructure improvements.

Published

2024-01-16
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-01-16
Package ID: BILLS-118s3591is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
1,951
Pages:
10
Sentences:
25

Language

Nouns: 615
Verbs: 142
Adjectives: 102
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 91
Entities: 143

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.47
Average Sentence Length:
78.04
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
42.08

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation titled "Stop Fentanyl at the Border Act" initiates appropriations to strengthen border security across the United States, with a primary focus on controlling the flow of illegal substances, notably fentanyl. It allocates substantial funding to enhance law enforcement capabilities at the border, imposes new reporting requirements to ensure transparency and oversight, and proposes increased criminal penalties for activities designed to destroy or circumvent border control measures.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise within this legislative proposal that warrant consideration:

  1. Funding Allocation Transparency: An allocation of $950 million for hiring and retention-focused support services poses concerns about potential wastefulness due to a lack of clear justification or measurable objectives. Additionally, vague language related to technological improvements and infrastructure upgrades could result in ambiguous fund usage, potentially leading to oversight and accountability challenges.

  2. Reporting and Accountability: The bill mandates the submission of reports to Congress by March 31, 2028. However, it does not specify criteria for evaluating effectiveness or require ongoing updates, potentially limiting transparency and impeding long-term accountability.

  3. Legal Enforcement Clarity: The terms used in the bill, notably "significant damage" and intentions to further criminal organizations, may lack precise definitions, posing risks of subjective interpretation and inconsistent enforcement. Furthermore, the absence of penalties for repeat offenders and safeguarding mechanisms could undermine efforts to deter repeated violations.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The potential impacts of this bill on the public and specific stakeholders are multi-faceted:

  • Public Safety: By providing substantial funding and resources for border security, the bill aims to reduce the influx of illegal drugs, particularly fentanyl, which poses significant public health risks. Enhancements to border enforcement and technology infrastructure could lead to a decrease in illegal drug trafficking and associated crime, ultimately promoting public safety.

  • Taxpayer Concerns: Without detailed accountability measures and justification for certain financial allocations, such as hiring bonuses and infrastructure upgrades, taxpayers may be concerned about the efficient use of public funds. Transparency in how these funds are utilized and the effectiveness of programs may influence public trust.

  • Government Agencies: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, along with various law enforcement agencies involved in drug interdiction efforts, would see increased resources and capabilities. While this could bolster operational effectiveness, it places significant importance on proper management and resource allocation to ensure that increased funding results in measurable improvements.

  • Legal and Judicial Implications: The bill's amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act introduce new penalties for border-related crimes. However, the vague language could pose enforcement challenges, potentially leading to legal disputes and necessitating clarifications to ensure fair and consistent application.

Overall, this bill represents a comprehensive effort to tackle illicit drug trafficking and enhance border security, but its success relies heavily on clear objectives, robust oversight mechanisms, and transparent fund allocation to garner broad public confidence and achieve meaningful outcomes.

Financial Assessment

The bill, S. 3591, outlines significant financial appropriations aimed at enhancing border security in the United States. The primary focus of the allocations centers around increasing personnel, advancing technology for drug interdiction, particularly fentanyl, and improving inspection infrastructure.

Financial Allocations

  1. Total Appropriations for Border Security: The bill proposes a total of $3,409,000,000 to enhance law enforcement capabilities at the border. This sum is intended to stay available until September 30, 2027. Key allocations include:

  2. $300,000,000 for civilian U.S. Border Patrol processing coordinators.

  3. $1,750,000,000 for additional U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and Border Patrol agents.
  4. $950,000,000 for hiring and retention bonuses, along with support services, including mental health.
  5. $409,000,000 for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services operations and support.

  6. Fentanyl Interdiction and Processing: The bill allocates $1,090,000,000 to increase drug interdiction and processing capabilities. This financial commitment includes:

  7. $960,000,000 for technology improvements, such as deploying inspection systems at ports of entry.

  8. $30,000,000 for improving image analysis and anomaly detection.
  9. $100,000,000 for other necessary tech upgrades.

  10. Outbound Inspection Capabilities: An appropriation of $285,000,000 is set to enhance outbound inspection efforts, including:

  11. $10,000,000 for a structured outbound inspection program.

  12. $275,000,000 for infrastructure projects at land borders.

  13. Disruption of Transnational Fentanyl Networks: Totaling $511,000,000, this fund is allocated across multiple agencies, including:

  14. $223,000,000 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

  15. $128,000,000 to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
  16. $110,000,000 to the Department of Justice’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces.
  17. $50,000,000 to the U.S. Marshals Service.

Relation to Identified Issues

  • The extensive financial commitments, particularly the $950,000,000 for hiring and support services, raise questions about justification. Without accompanying measurable objectives or accountability metrics, there is a risk of potential wasteful use of taxpayer money. The lack of clarity and specificity could lead to unaccounted expenditures.

  • In Section 2, terms like "technology improvements and upgrades" are vague, which might result in ambiguities about how funds are utilized. This could lead to challenges in tracking accountability and ensuring effective use of resources.

  • The allocation of $275,000,000 for outbound inspection infrastructure may appear excessive without further detailed justification or a clear strategic plan. Concerns arise regarding the financial prudency of such a large public expenditure.

  • Reporting requirements in Section 3 fall short in specifying criteria for evaluating effectiveness, which could diminish transparency in how the allocated funds are being utilized or the success of the implemented measures.

In conclusion, while the bill addresses critical needs for border security, its financial allocations would benefit from more precise definitions, measurable goals, and accountability mechanisms to ensure effective and efficient use of resources.

Issues

  • The allocation of $950,000,000 for hiring and retention-focused support services in Section 2(a)(3) may be perceived as excessive without clear justification, measurable objectives, or accountability metrics, raising concerns about potential wastefulness of taxpayer money.

  • The vague wording in Section 2 concerning 'technology improvements and upgrades' and 'other technology and infrastructure upgrades' (Section 2(b)(1) and Section 2(b)(3)) could lead to ambiguity in fund utilization and accountability issues.

  • Section 3, regarding reporting requirements, fails to specify timelines beyond March 31, 2028, and lacks criteria for evaluating effectiveness, which could hinder accountability and transparency in the execution of the bill's provisions.

  • In Section 4, the term 'significant damage' remains undefined, posing risks of arbitrary or inconsistent enforcement, which could lead to legal challenges or disputes regarding the threshold for prosecution.

  • The absence of specific penalties for repeat offenders and safeguarding mechanisms in Section 4 raises concerns about the sufficiency of deterrence against repeated violations of the law.

  • The intention to 'further the objectives of a criminal organization' in the new Section 274E is difficult to prove in a legal context without further clarification, potentially complicating enforcement and prosecution efforts.

  • The allocation of $275,000,000 in Section 2(c)(2) for outbound inspections infrastructure projects may seem excessive without detailed justification or strategic plans, questioning financial prudence in light of public spending scrutiny.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill provides its name, stating it can be referred to as the “Stop Fentanyl at the Border Act”.

2. Funding Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section outlines funding for border security and law enforcement efforts for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025. It allocates over $3 billion to enhance border law enforcement, support customs and border staff, improve technology for processing and detecting illegal drugs, disrupt outbound flows of firearms and money, and counteract transnational fentanyl networks through various U.S. agencies like Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Money References

  • SEC. 2. Funding. (a) Enhancing law enforcement capabilities at the border.—There is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, $3,409,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, to support and enhance law enforcement capabilities at land borders of the United States, of which— (1) $300,000,000 shall be for additional civilian U.S. Border Patrol processing coordinators; (2) $1,750,000,000 shall be for additional U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers, U.S. Border Patrol agents, and mission support staff within the Office of Field Operations and U.S. Border Patrol; (3) $950,000,000 shall be for hiring bonuses, retention bonuses, and retention-focused support services, including mental health services, for U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers, U.S. Border Patrol agents, U.S. Border Patrol processing coordinators, and any other U.S. Customs and Border Protection staff whose work supports operations at the land borders of the United States; and (4) $409,000,000 shall be for “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services–Operations and Support” to contribute to improved operations along the land borders of the United States.
  • (b) Increasing fentanyl interdiction and enhancing processing capabilities at the border.—There is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, $1,090,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, to increase drug interdiction and processing capabilities at land borders of the United States, of which— (1) $960,000,000 shall be for technology improvements and upgrades, which may include— (A) the procurement and deployment of large-scale, small-scale, and handheld non-intrusive inspection scanning systems at ports of entry along the land borders of the United States; and (B) upgrades to the information technology infrastructure upon which these systems and associated software are operated; (2) $30,000,000 shall be for technological and procedural improvements to the process of analyzing and adjudicating images from non-intrusive inspection scanning technology at land ports of entry, which may include support for the continued development of anomaly detection algorithms to enhance detection of illegal drugs at land ports of entry; and (3) $100,000,000 shall be for other technology and infrastructure upgrades that the Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection deems necessary for the agency's drug interdiction work. (c) Disrupting the outbound flow of firearms and currency from the United States.—There is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, $285,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, for increasing outbound inspection capabilities, including disrupting the flow of firearms and currency out of the United States, of which— (1) $10,000,000 shall be for supporting the creation of a structured outbound inspection program within the Office of Field Operations that includes a comprehensive outbound inspection policy and performance metrics to measure the impact of outbound inspections; and (2) $275,000,000 shall be for outbound inspections infrastructure projects at the land borders of the United States, including— (A) technology and connectivity improvements at rural ports of entry; and (B) safety and technology upgrades to outbound inspection lanes at ports of entry. (d) Disrupting transnational fentanyl networks.—There is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025— (1) $223,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to expand efforts to interdict fentanyl and other illegal drugs, and disrupt networks operated by transnational criminal organizations within the United States, of which— (A) $113,000,000 shall be for additional Homeland Security Investigations special agents; (B) $80,000,000 shall be for the implementation of Homeland Security Investigations’ Strategy for Combating Illicit Opioids; and (C) $30,000,000 shall be for joint surge operations along the land borders of the United States by Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (2) $128,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, of which— (A) $68,000,000 shall be for salaries and expenses relating to increased law enforcement activities along the land borders of the United States; and (B) $60,000,000 shall be for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program; (3) $110,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, to the Department of Justice for the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces; and (4) $50,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2027, to the U.S. Marshals Service for salaries and expenses relating to increased law enforcement activities along the land borders of the United States. ---

3. Reporting requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirement for three separate reports to be submitted to Congress by March 31, 2028, concerning different aspects of U.S. Customs and Border Protection operations: the role and impact of Border Patrol Processing Coordinator positions, the equipment needs for a proposed outbound vehicle inspection program, and the current and future use of inspection technology at U.S. land ports of entry, including considerations about costs, space, and environmental factors.

4. Penalties for hindering immigration, border, and customs controls Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes penalties for anyone who intentionally damages or bypasses border security measures like fences or sensors for illegal purposes such as financial gain, aiding a criminal organization, or breaking customs laws. Violators can face fines, up to five years in prison, or both.

274E. Destroying or evading border controls Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Anyone who knowingly and unlawfully damages or bypasses any government-installed border security equipment at U.S. borders or ports of entry with the intent to gain financially, support a criminal organization, or violate U.S. laws, can face a fine, up to 5 years in prison, or both.