Overview

Title

To require annual reporting on the availability of Federal funds to persons and entities of China and activities conducted in collaboration with China, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill is like asking for a yearly check-up on how America is spending money when it does things with China, making sure nothing sneaky is going on and everyone knows where the money goes.

Summary AI

The bill S. 3582, titled the “Our Money in China Transparency Act,” requires annual reports to be prepared on how federal funds are used in relation to China. It mandates the Office of Management and Budget, along with each federal department or agency, to detail funds given to Chinese entities or used for joint U.S.-China projects. The first report must also include data from the past ten fiscal years. This aims to ensure transparency regarding U.S. federal spending involving Chinese individuals or organizations.

Published

2024-01-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-01-11
Package ID: BILLS-118s3582is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
900
Pages:
5
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 275
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 61
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27
Entities: 80

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.18
Average Sentence Length:
81.82
Token Entropy:
4.77
Readability (ARI):
42.74

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, named the "Our Money in China Transparency Act," requires detailed annual reports on how federal funds are utilized concerning Chinese entities and collaborative activities with China. Introduced in the U.S. Senate, the bill mandates an extensive federal accounting process to provide transparency on the flow of funds from U.S. entities to Chinese counterparts or collaborative projects involving China.

General Summary

The bill seeks to increase transparency regarding the allocation of federal funds to Chinese persons or entities. This includes the Chinese government, the Chinese Communist Party, campuses of U.S. colleges in China, Chinese nationals residing in China, and other Chinese organizations. The bill also defines a United States entity as any institution of higher education or organization incorporated under U.S. law. A significant component is the requirement for comprehensive reports outlining how much money flows to Chinese entities or joint projects. The first report must include data spanning back ten years.

Significant Issues

A key concern with the bill is its broad definition of "Chinese person or entity," which could encompass a wide range of individuals and organizations, raising ethical concerns and potential accusations of discrimination. There is also the possibility of placing a substantial administrative burden on federal agencies due to the need for detailed and possibly invasive financial reporting. The initial ten-year retrospective report may present practical challenges if relevant records are incomplete or nonexistent.

Additionally, the terms "joint, collaborative, or bilateral effort" are insufficiently defined, which could result in inconsistent interpretations by different agencies. There is also a lack of clear criteria for identifying and categorizing entities as "Chinese," which could lead to discrepancies in reporting.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill aims to enhance transparency and ensure responsible use of federal funds, especially in contexts involving foreign nations perceived as geopolitical competitors. Greater transparency might reassure taxpayers that their money is not funding activities against national interests.

However, the rigorous reporting requirements could divert resources from other governmental functions, potentially causing inefficiencies or delays. The heightened scrutiny of Chinese entities could strain U.S.-China relations, affecting international business and academic collaborations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Federal agencies will bear the responsibility for implementing the bill's stringent reporting requirements, likely necessitating additional resources and possibly new administrative structures. They might face challenges in distinguishing which entities qualify as "Chinese" under the legislation and ensuring compliance with retrospective reporting requirements.

Stakeholders in academic or commercial partnerships with Chinese entities could see increased scrutiny, which might disrupt existing collaborations or discourage new ones. This could negatively impact U.S. institutions and businesses that rely on international partnerships for innovation and development.

Overall, while the bill's emphasis on transparency is a step toward greater fiscal accountability, its broad definitions and demanding administrative requirements might lead to various practical challenges, complicating its potential to effectuate improved oversight over federal funds.

Issues

  • The broad definition of 'Chinese person or entity' in Section 2 could be perceived as discriminatory, targeting the entire Chinese nationality. This might raise legal and ethical issues about fairness and international relations.

  • The requirement in Section 3 for detailed financial reporting and disaggregation concerning Chinese entities could lead to substantial administrative burdens and potential privacy concerns, particularly if sensitive information is disclosed.

  • The lack of specific criteria in Section 3 for identifying or categorizing entities as 'Chinese' could lead to inconsistencies in how departments and agencies report information, impacting the reliability of the data collected.

  • Section 3's requirement for retrospective reporting of financial data up to 10 years prior may be impractical or impossible due to the unavailability of records, thereby complicating compliance efforts.

  • The definition of 'United States entity' in Section 2 may be too narrow, potentially leading to regulatory gaps where certain types of entities under U.S. jurisdiction are not covered in the reporting requirements.

  • The vague terms 'joint, collaborative, or bilateral effort' in Section 3 may lead to inconsistencies in reporting and necessitate clearer definitions to ensure standardized interpretations across federal departments and agencies.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill indicates that it can be called the “Our Money in China Transparency Act.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the bill defines the terms "Chinese person or entity" and "United States entity." A "Chinese person or entity" includes the Chinese government, the Chinese Communist Party, certain foreign campuses of U.S. colleges in China, Chinese citizens residing in China, and other organizations based in China, including their U.S. branches. A "United States entity" refers to U.S. institutions of higher education and other organizations established under U.S. law.

3. Report on funding Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirements for Federal agencies and the Office of Management and Budget to report how funds from U.S. accounts are used in relation to China, including money given to Chinese entities or for U.S.-China partnerships, and it mandates an initial report covering the past ten fiscal years.