Overview
Title
To require the President to publish a statement of reasons for pardons, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the President to tell everyone why they pardon someone, like giving a special permission slip, and this reason needs to be shared in a public place. It also asks people who help with these permissions to write down what they do and look into how these actions might affect ongoing work at the Justice Department.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the “Pardon Transparency to Protect Investigations Act of 2024,” requires the President to publicly share the reasons for granting pardons by publishing them in the Federal Register and on the President's official website. The bill mandates the Pardon Attorney to prepare a Justice Impact Statement when a pardon is considered, including opinions from victims, the Attorney General, and other officials about the potential effects on ongoing investigations. It also requires lobbyists working on securing pardons to register and report their activities. Additionally, the Pardon Attorney must conduct regular studies and submit reports to Congress on compliance with the act.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill titled “Pardon Transparency to Protect Investigations Act of 2024” proposes new requirements for the process of granting presidential pardons. Introduced by Mr. Blumenthal in the Senate on January 9, 2024, the bill aims to enhance transparency by mandating the President to publish a written statement explaining the reasons behind any grant of executive clemency — a term which includes pardons, commutations, reprieves, or remissions of fines. The bill also outlines duties for the Pardon Attorney concerning victim notification and consultation with various legal authorities. Additionally, it introduces specific rules for lobbyists involved in pardon-related activities and calls for periodic studies to ensure compliance.
Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from the current draft of the bill:
Lack of Specificity and Clarity: The bill does not specify what information needs to be included in the written explanation for a pardon, which might lead to insufficient transparency (Section 3). Ambiguities also exist regarding the responsibilities of the Pardon Attorney and the process of gathering and weighing stakeholders' opinions (Section 4).
Definitions and References: The term "executive clemency" and other legal definitions are drawn from external acts, potentially causing confusion for those unfamiliar with legal terminology (Section 2, 5).
Practical Implementation Challenges: The bill imposes rapid timelines for lobbyists involved in clemency cases to register and report their activities, which may be unrealistic for thorough compliance (Section 5). Additionally, no resources are allocated for the compliance study, posing feasibility challenges (Section 6).
Enforceability Concerns: The bill lacks detailed penalties for non-compliance with the lobbying provisions, leaving a gap in enforceability (Section 5). The severability clause also leaves ambiguity regarding handling invalid provisions (Section 7).
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Public Impact
For the general public, increased transparency in the pardon process could bolster trust in executive decisions and provide reassurance that clemency is not being granted arbitrarily. By requiring public disclosure of reasons for pardons, citizens gain better insight into presidential decision-making, potentially leading to greater accountability in governance.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Victims and Families: The bill requires notifying and considering victims’ opinions during pardon considerations, which could grant victims a stronger voice in the process. However, the vague definition of "victims" and the process of gathering and weighing opinions might cause dissatisfaction if not properly addressed.
The President and the Executive Branch: For the executive branch, the additional requirements may increase administrative burdens, potentially complicating and delaying the clemency process. Clarity and support will be essential to manage these added responsibilities effectively.
Lobbyists and Legal Professionals: The rapid timeline for registration might pose logistical challenges for those engaged in lobbying activities, potentially leading to inadvertent non-compliance. Legal professionals involved in these processes may face increased scrutiny, and clear penalties for non-compliance should be defined to maintain the integrity of the system.
Conclusion
The "Pardon Transparency to Protect Investigations Act of 2024" is geared towards fostering transparency and accountability in the presidential pardon process. While the objectives of the bill appear commendable in promoting openness, several areas require clearer definitions and practical considerations to ensure effective implementation. Specifically, challenges related to ambiguities, timelines, enforceability, and stakeholder engagement need to be addressed to allow the bill to achieve its intended goals successfully.
Issues
The bill requires the President to publish a statement of reasons for granting pardons, yet it lacks specificity on the information required in this explanation and fails to establish who is responsible for publication and oversight, which might lead to transparency and accountability concerns (Section 3).
The term 'executive clemency' is referenced in an external act, potentially causing confusion for those unfamiliar with the legal definition. The bill also does not include its definition in Section 3, possibly leading to confusion and misinterpretation (Section 5).
The duties of the Pardon Attorney under the bill are vaguely defined, particularly concerning what constitutes 'reasonable efforts' and the process by which stakeholders' opinions are weighted. This could result in implementation challenges and stakeholder dissatisfaction (Section 4).
The bill mandates rapid registration and reporting timelines for lobbyists involved in executive clemency cases, which may be impractically short and pose compliance difficulties (Section 5).
The bill fails to allocate any resources or budget for conducting the compliance study, which might raise concerns about the feasibility and potential for wasteful spending (Section 6).
The severability clause is vague concerning the process and responsible entity for dealing with invalid provisions, leading to potential legal ambiguity and operational challenges (Section 7).
The phrase 'not fewer than 1 lobbying contact' is awkwardly worded and could be simplified for better clarity, which might affect the understanding and enforcement of lobbying registration provisions (Section 5).
The section on lobbying contacts lacks details on the repercussions for non-compliance, which could potentially weaken the enforceability of the registration and reporting requirements (Section 5).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, stating that it may be referred to as the “Pardon Transparency to Protect Investigations Act of 2024”.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this Act, executive clemency refers to the President's power to grant reprieves, pardons, commutations, reprieves, or remissions of fines, as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, the term victim is defined as per the Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act of 1990.
3. Statement of reasons for pardons Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires that whenever the President grants an executive clemency, a written explanation of the reasons for this decision must be published both in the Federal Register and on the President's official website.
4. Duties of the Pardon Attorney Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The duties of the Pardon Attorney include preparing a Justice Impact Statement when the President considers granting executive clemency. This statement must include efforts to inform victims and gather their opinions, as well as the opinions of legal officials, about the clemency decision's impact.
5. Pardon lobbying disclosure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes require lobbyists to register and report when they are involved in activities related to executive clemency, such as pardons or sentence commutations, within 2 days of making contact or being hired for this purpose. These amendments aim to increase transparency in lobbying efforts connected to presidential clemency actions.
6. Studies and reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that starting 180 days after the law is enacted, the Pardon Attorney must study how well the law is being followed every two years. Additionally, by April 1 each year after the study is done, a report with the study's results and suggestions for improvements must be submitted to Congress.
7. Severability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If any part of this Act or its amendments is found to be invalid for a person or situation, the rest of the Act and its amendments will continue to be in effect for everyone and everything else.