Overview

Title

To repeal programs relating to funding for electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 3559 is a bill that wants to stop giving money to help build places where electric cars can charge. It also wants to take back any leftover money that was going to be used for this and make sure no more money is spent on these projects.

Summary AI

S. 3559 is a bill introduced in the Senate aiming to end certain programs that fund electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Specifically, it seeks to repeal grants related to charging and fueling infrastructure outlined in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The bill also proposes to rescind unused funds and terminate the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, ensuring no additional funds are used for the discontinued programs.

Published

2024-01-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-01-08
Package ID: BILLS-118s3559is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
488
Pages:
3
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 153
Verbs: 32
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 31
Entities: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.11
Average Sentence Length:
69.71
Token Entropy:
4.55
Readability (ARI):
35.84

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Unplug the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Program Act," aims to repeal certain programs related to funding for electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Introduced in the U.S. Senate by Ms. Ernst, the bill specifically targets portions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that provide grants for developing charging and fueling infrastructure. Furthermore, it seeks to terminate the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, rescinding any unspent funds allocated to this initiative. The bill does not introduce new funding alternatives or policies, simply repealing the existing ones related to electric vehicle infrastructure.

Significant Issues

Several important issues arise from this bill:

  1. Lack of Alternative Plans: A key concern is that the bill terminates existing programs without suggesting alternate plans for ongoing projects or commitments. This abrupt cessation could disrupt projects mid-development, creating uncertainty for organizations and stakeholders reliant on these funds.

  2. Complexity and Accessibility: The legislative text involves a complex series of references and headings, making it potentially difficult for the general public to understand. This complexity could hinder transparency and accessibility for those trying to comprehend the bill's full impact.

  3. Unclear Impact Explanation: The bill lacks clear documentation about the effect of rescinding funds and terminating programs. Stakeholders might struggle to understand the consequences and how they might adjust to these changes.

  4. Transparency and Rationale: No clear justification is provided for why the electric vehicle funding programs are being repealed. This lack of transparency might cause dissatisfaction among the public and stakeholders who support electric vehicle initiatives.

  5. Typographical Error: A minor but notable issue is a typographic error in the phrase "no funds may used," which could affect the bill's clarity and legal interpretation.

  6. Title Limitation: The title section merely designates the bill's name without offering substantive content or explanation, leaving questions about its broader intentions.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill might have significant implications for the general public, particularly regarding electric vehicle (EV) adoption and infrastructure. By repealing funding programs, the initiative could slow the expansion of EV charging stations, potentially limiting options for current and prospective electric vehicle owners. Those considering a switch to electric vehicles may face additional barriers if infrastructure expansion is stalled, affecting the country's transition to sustainable transport options.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • Fiscal Conservatives: Those who favor reducing government spending may view this bill as a positive step, aligning with their priorities of decreasing federal expenditure and dependency on public funds for infrastructure projects.

Negative Impacts:

  • Environmental Advocates and EV Supporters: Groups and individuals focused on climate change and sustainability might view this legislative action negatively, as it could represent a retreat from efforts to reduce carbon emissions through increased electric vehicle use.

  • Construction and Infrastructure Companies: Businesses engaged in building and maintaining EV infrastructure may face project cancellations, revenue loss, and workforce impacts if these programs are halted.

  • Public Utilities and State Entities: States and local entities that have been planning to expand their EV infrastructures may find themselves financially and logistically challenged, requiring them to revisit their strategic plans.

In conclusion, while this bill emphasizes a particular ideological stance on government spending and infrastructural development, its potential impacts cannot be overlooked. They range from practical concerns regarding completed and anticipated projects to broader considerations about the country's environmental and technological policies. As with any legislative proposal, stakeholders from various sectors will need to assess how these changes align with their objectives and prepare for adjustments necessitated by the policy shifts.

Issues

  • Section 3: The bill proposes the termination of the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program but does not specify alternative plans for existing commitments or infrastructure projects that may have been reliant on this funding. This could disrupt ongoing projects and affect stakeholders involved in electric vehicle charging infrastructure, raising concerns about planning and continuity.

  • Section 3: The legislative text uses a complex chain of headings and references (e.g., 'highway infrastructure programs' under 'Federal Highway Administration' under 'Department of Transportation' in title VIII of division J) which may be difficult for laypersons to follow. This could impact the accessibility and transparency of the legislation to the general public.

  • Section 3: The section's language could be clarified by providing a summary or explanation of the impact of the rescission and termination on existing projects and stakeholders. The lack of clear documentation may lead to misunderstandings regarding the consequences of the program's termination.

  • Section 3: There is no explanation provided as to why these funds are rescinded and the program terminated, which could be construed as lacking transparency or rationale, potentially leading to public and stakeholder dissatisfaction.

  • Section 3: The phrase 'no funds may used' appears to have a typographical error, missing the word 'be', which might affect the legal clarity and enforceability of the legislative text.

  • Section 1: The section provides only a title and does not give any substantive information, making it impossible to identify or audit potential issues regarding spending or language clarity.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states its official short title, which is the "Unplug the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Program Act".

2. Repeal of charging and fueling infrastructure grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section removes specific parts of the law related to grants for charging and fueling infrastructure, which includes eliminating a subparagraph, renumbering others, and deleting some grant program language from the U.S. Code.

3. Repeal of National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains the repeal of the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, stating that unspent funds from the program under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will be taken back, the program will end, and no more money can be used for it.