Overview

Title

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to provide the Financial Stability Oversight Council with duties regarding artificial intelligence in the financial sector, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The FAIRR Act is a new rule that asks special money experts to look at how computers making their own decisions (AI) can affect money and making sure it's safe. It wants to set rules to make sure these super-smart computers don't cause big money problems.

Summary AI

The bill S. 3554, titled the "Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act" or "FAIRR Act," aims to amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 by assigning the Financial Stability Oversight Council new responsibilities related to the use of artificial intelligence in the financial sector. It seeks to identify and address potential risks AI might pose to financial stability and enhance regulations to manage these risks effectively. The bill also establishes provisions for overseeing AI service providers associated with financial institutions and imposes stricter penalties and liability measures for violations involving machine-manipulated media and AI models used in finance.

Published

2023-12-18
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2023-12-18
Package ID: BILLS-118s3554is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
10
Words:
1,691
Pages:
8
Sentences:
27

Language

Nouns: 531
Verbs: 125
Adjectives: 93
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 73
Entities: 89

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.48
Average Sentence Length:
62.63
Token Entropy:
5.19
Readability (ARI):
34.49

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act" or "FAIRR Act", aims to amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010. It focuses on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) considerations into the responsibilities of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). The bill seeks to address potential risks posed by AI technologies in the financial sector and suggests measures for oversight and regulation. It includes provisions for coordinated agency efforts to identify threats from AI, updates regulatory standards to close identified gaps, and enhances the oversight authority over third-party AI service providers. Additionally, it implements stricter penalties for the misuse of AI in financial practices.

Significant Issues

A major issue with the bill is its reliance on references to external legislation and documents, such as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 and the Cybersecurity Information Sheet. Bridging the gap between these documents and the bill's provisions might prove challenging if accessible information is limited. Moreover, the bill lacks specificity in several areas, such as the definition of "reasonable steps" required to prevent AI-related violations, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement or regulatory ambiguity. The proposal introduces treble penalties for violations involving AI-manipulated media, a measure which some may view as excessively punitive without clear reasoning provided.

Additionally, the notion of "enhanced authority" for oversight over AI service providers remains ill-defined, raising concerns over potential regulatory overreach or inconstant application. Other areas of concern include potential financial ambiguities regarding the budget assigned to the FSOC for conducting relevant research and scenario-based exercises to guard against AI-related disruptions in the financial market.

Impact on the Public

The public at large might benefit from a potential increase in financial market stability through the proposed oversight and regulation of AI technologies. By addressing AI's risks, the FAIRR Act aims to protect consumers from financial disruptions and fraudulent activities that could arise from the misuse of advanced technologies. However, if the bill's implementation lacks clarity, it could lead to regulatory uncertainties, potentially affecting consumer trust in financial institutions.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Financial institutions, AI developers, and regulatory agencies are significantly impacted by this bill. Financial entities could face increased compliance costs and regulatory burdens as they align their operations with the new standards and oversight mechanisms. Consequently, smaller financial institutions might struggle more than their larger counterparts to meet these requirements, potentially affecting competitive balance within the sector.

AI developers could find themselves liable for defects or issues arising from their technologies under the bill's liability provisions. It could incentivize the development of more robust and secure AI models, yet it may also deter innovation due to concerns over heightened liability risks. Regulatory bodies face the challenge of interpreting and applying the bill's provisions, particularly where terminological vagueness occurs. They must navigate these complexities while attempting to maintain financial stability without stifling technological advancement.

In conclusion, while the FAIRR Act is well-intentioned in seeking to harness AI capabilities while safeguarding the financial sector, several areas require careful consideration and clarity to ensure its effective implementation and avoid unintended negative consequences for various stakeholders.

Issues

  • The definition of 'artificial intelligence' is linked to another act, the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020, which might create legal ambiguities or enforceability issues if the definition is unclear or not widely accessible. (Sec. 2)

  • The bill allows for treble penalties for violations involving 'machine-manipulated media.' This could be seen as excessively punitive, especially without clear justification or an understanding of the full implications, raising potential ethical and fairness concerns. (Sec. 6)

  • The vagueness in the term 'reasonable steps' for preventing AI-related securities violations could lead to inconsistent enforcement or legal challenges, impacting stakeholders in the financial industry. (Sec. 7)

  • There is a potential financial ambiguity concerning the funding or budget for research on the uses of artificial intelligence by financial institutions, which could raise concerns regarding cost and spending. (Sec. 3, Sec. 126)

  • The bill references external documents like the Cybersecurity Information Sheet without providing explicit details, which could cause misalignment in understanding or implementation if these documents are not clear or outdated. (Sec. 3)

  • The term 'enhanced authority' regarding oversight of AI service providers lacks clarity, which could impact the enforceability of this oversight and potentially lead to uneven regulatory application. (Sec. 4)

  • The requirement for 'transparency and disclosure' in AI regulation and supervision is broad and lacks specific guidelines, which might result in varied interpretations and practices by agencies. (Sec. 3, Sec. 126)

  • The bill's language on identifying 'malign actors' or AI-related threats in the financial sector is vague, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement or regulatory challenges. (Sec. 3, Sec. 126)

  • The reference to the 'removal of subsection (f)' in the context of oversight lacks an explanation, creating ambiguity and potential regulatory gaps regarding previously addressed matters. (Sec. 4)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section specifies the short title of the Act, which can be referred to as the “Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act” or simply the “FAIRR Act”.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the term "artificial intelligence" is defined according to its meaning in a specific U.S. law, the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020.

3. Special provisions regarding artificial intelligence in the financial sector Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill introduces a new section to the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to address the use of artificial intelligence in the financial sector. It calls for coordination among financial agencies to assess risks, make recommendations, and conduct scenario-based exercises to prevent disruptions caused by AI, ensuring financial stability and transparency.

126. Special provisions regarding artificial intelligence in the financial sector Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines steps for coordinating the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the financial sector to ensure stability. It involves researching potential risks, identifying gaps in current regulations, and recommending improvements. Additionally, it includes congressional review, implementation of recommendations, and exercises to test defenses against AI-related market disruptions.

4. Enhanced authority to oversee third-party providers of artificial intelligence and other services to financial institutions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section enhances the authority to oversee third-party providers of artificial intelligence and other services to financial institutions. It modifies the Federal Credit Union Act by making technical changes to the text and removing a specific subsection.

5. Regulation of service providers by the federal housing finance agency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes how the Federal Housing Finance Agency will regulate and examine activities performed by service providers for a regulated entity or the Office of Finance. If these activities are carried out by an external service provider, the same rules apply as if the work was done internally, and any service relationships must be reported to the Director within 30 days.

1329. Regulation and examination of certain service providers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Whenever a regulated entity or the Office of Finance hires another company to do work for them, the Director has the authority to oversee and inspect this work as if it were done by the regulated entity or Office themselves. Additionally, they must inform the Director about this service agreement within 30 days after the contract is made or the work begins, whichever happens first.

6. Treble penalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Under the amended Securities Exchange Act, penalties for breaking rules using fake or manipulated media, as defined by a specific Intelligence Act, can be increased to up to three times the normal amount.

7. Liability Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to the Securities Exchange Act holds any person using an artificial intelligence model responsible for any actions or outcomes of the model, as if they performed those actions themselves, unless they took reasonable measures to prevent violations of federal securities laws. Additionally, developers of AI models cannot waive liability for defects that result in violating these laws.

42. Liability Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Any person using or deploying an AI model is responsible for its actions under Federal securities laws unless they have taken reasonable steps to prevent violations, like having clear policies. Developers of AI models cannot waive their liability for design defects if these defects lead to violations of these laws.