Overview
Title
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for hospital and insurer price transparency.
ELI5 AI
S. 3548 is like a rulebook telling hospitals and health insurance companies they must show people how much healthcare services cost, just like how price tags in stores show the price of toys. This helps everyone know the cost before choosing their doctor or hospital.
Summary AI
S. 3548 aims to enhance healthcare price transparency in the United States by amending the Public Health Service Act. The bill requires hospitals, insurers, laboratories, and other healthcare providers to publicly disclose pricing information for services and procedures, allowing consumers to better compare costs across providers. It establishes methods for making this information available online in a standardized format and includes penalties for non-compliance. The legislation also aims to ensure that consumers have access to accurate and timely pricing details when planning their healthcare expenses.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The bill titled "Health Care Prices Revealed and Information to Consumers Explained Transparency Act," also known as the "Health Care PRICE Transparency Act 2.0," aims to enhance transparency in healthcare pricing by amending the Public Health Service Act. Introduced in December 2023, the legislation requires hospitals, laboratories, imaging service providers, ambulatory surgical centers, and health insurers to disclose detailed price information. The ultimate goal of the bill is to make healthcare pricing more transparent and understandable for consumers, thereby allowing them to make more informed choices.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the significant issues with the bill is its complex structure for civil monetary penalties, especially for hospitals and other healthcare providers. The tiered penalty system could impose considerable financial burdens on smaller or rural hospitals, potentially raising fairness concerns.
Additionally, the language concerning the preemption of state laws could result in legal ambiguities. The bill allows state laws to remain unless they conflict with the new requirements, which could create a complex regulatory environment for entities operating across multiple states.
Some provisions, like the requirement for laboratories to update price information annually, may not offer real-time transparency, potentially misleading consumers and eroding trust. The penalties specified for imaging centers and surgical centers may not be sufficient to ensure compliance, especially for larger organizations.
How the Bill Might Impact the Public Broadly
Broadly, the bill is designed to empower consumers with better information about healthcare pricing. If implemented effectively, it could lead to increased competition among healthcare providers, potentially lowering healthcare costs for consumers. By having price transparency, consumers can shop around for more affordable services, thereby driving down prices through market competition.
The bill also aims to eliminate surprise medical bills and unexpected costs, enhancing the consumer experience in an often opaque industry. However, due to its complexity, there might be implementation challenges, leading to confusion and possible resistance from healthcare providers.
How the Bill Might Impact Specific Stakeholders
For hospitals and healthcare providers, especially smaller or rural institutions, the bill could impose significant administrative burdens and financial penalties. These organizations might struggle to meet the stringent transparency requirements and complex enforcement mechanisms, possibly leading to financial strain or closure.
In contrast, patients and healthcare consumers stand to benefit from greater transparency, as they would have access to clearer information about your healthcare expenses and options. This could lead to more informed decision-making and reduced personal healthcare costs.
Insurance companies may face an increase in administrative costs to comply with transparency requirements, which could, in turn, influence insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs for policyholders.
Lastly, state governments might face challenges in aligning their existing healthcare transparency laws with this federal legislation. The bill does not fully preempt state laws, allowing varying degrees of regulatory obligations, which could lead to a fragmented and complex regulatory landscape.
Overall, the bill has the potential to significantly alter the healthcare pricing dynamic in the United States, but successful implementation would require clear guidelines, adequate support for smaller institutions, and careful alignment of state and federal regulations.
Financial Assessment
The bill, S. 3548, introduces several provisions related to financial transparency and penalties within the healthcare system. The following commentary highlights how financial references are integrated into the bill and how they relate to potential issues identified.
Financial Penalties for Non-Compliance
The bill outlines civil monetary penalties for hospitals, laboratories, imaging services, and ambulatory surgical centers that fail to comply with the transparency requirements.
Hospitals: Penalties vary depending on the size of the hospital. For instance, a hospital with 30 or fewer beds faces penalties of $300 per day, which escalates to higher daily amounts for larger hospitals. For example, hospitals with more than 500 beds face $25 per bed per day, with increases after prolonged non-compliance, potentially reaching up to $35 per bed per day after a year. For persistent non-compliance, fines can range from $500,000 to $10,000,000.
Laboratories: If a laboratory continues to fail compliance, it may incur penalties not exceeding $300 per day.
Imaging Services and Ambulatory Surgical Centers: Similar penalties apply, up to $300 per day for ongoing non-compliance.
The use of these financial penalties could impose significant hardships on smaller or rural healthcare providers, potentially exacerbating existing financial struggles, especially for those with limited resources as highlighted in the issues.
Impact on Healthcare Providers
The requirement for healthcare providers to disclose standard charges and payer-specific negotiated charges attempts to foster transparency, which can be financially burdensome. These figures must be expressed in clear monetary terms and updated annually. This could involve complex data management systems, thereby increasing operational costs, particularly impacting smaller entities that might lack the capacity to adapt quickly to such reforms.
Insurance and Plan Requirements
Health plans are mandated to provide in-network rates and maximum allowed amounts for services in real time through a self-service tool. This requirement potentially increases costs for insurers, potentially leading to higher premiums for consumers. Given the concerns expressed over the financial impact on smaller health plans, this could lead to indirect financial pressures on consumers.
Enforcement and Benefits
While stringent penalties are emphasized, it remains uncertain if they will serve as effective deterrents for larger organizations. The specified amounts may not sufficiently incentivize larger entities to fully comply, potentially resulting in unequal adherence across the industry.
Economic Implications
Overall, the bill introduces economic measures intended to enhance transparency and consumer choice in healthcare. However, these provisions may lead to financial strain on smaller providers and potential increases in consumer costs, which could hinder the broader goal of accessible and affordable healthcare as envisaged by the bill. Addressing these financial challenges while ensuring compliance will be necessary to realize the bill's objectives effectively.
Issues
The complex civil monetary penalties structure in Section 2, particularly with multiple tiers and escalating amounts for noncompliance with hospital price transparency requirements, could impose significant financial strain on smaller or rural hospitals, raising concerns about fairness and ability to comply given resource limitations.
Section 8's language regarding 'preemption only in event of conflict' could lead to legal ambiguities and conflicts between state and federal laws, creating a patchwork of regulations that complicate compliance for entities operating in multiple states, and raising questions about the balance of state versus federal power.
The requirement in Section 3 for laboratories to update price information not less frequently than annually might not ensure real-time transparency, potentially resulting in outdated pricing that misleads consumers, creating issues of trust and accuracy in consumer transactions.
Sections 4 and 5 specify civil monetary penalties for imaging and ambulatory surgical centers that may not be a sufficient deterrent for larger organizations, thus potentially failing to enforce compliance on a broad scale and leading to disparities in price transparency.
The wide definition of 'third party payer' in Section 3 as 'an entity that is, by statute, contract, or agreement, legally responsible for payment of a claim for a health care item or service' might be too broad, creating confusion and potential legal disputes about who counts as a payer.
The requirement in Section 6 for health plans to provide a 'self-service tool' could impose significant costs on smaller health plans, potentially leading to increased premium costs for consumers, thus having a financial impact on both businesses and individuals.
The technical language and highly specific data format requirements in Section 7 could lead to increased administrative burdens and costs for compliance, particularly affecting smaller providers who may not have the resources or expertise to manage such complexity.
Section 8's exclusion for health plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 may lead to confusion or disputes concerning applicability of federal and state regulations, affecting the legislative consistency and uniformity of health care regulations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill introduces the name of the legislation, which can be referred to as the "Health Care Prices Revealed and Information to Consumers Explained Transparency Act" or simply the "Health Care PRICE Transparency Act 2.0".
2. Strengthening hospital price transparency requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section enhances requirements for hospitals to be more transparent about their prices by making them publicly share their standard charges and negotiated prices for services in a clear and accessible format. It outlines penalties for non-compliance, including monetary fines, and mandates hospitals to provide price lists for at least 300 services before 2025, aiming to help consumers easily understand and compare healthcare costs.
Money References
- “(ii) The gross charge, as applicable, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service, when provided in, as applicable, the inpatient setting and outpatient department setting.
- “(iii) The discounted cash price, as applicable, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service when provided in, as applicable, the inpatient setting and outpatient department setting (or, in the case no discounted cash price is available for an item or service, the minimum cash price accepted by the hospital from self-pay individuals for such item or service, expressed as a dollar amount, as well as, with respect to prices made public pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii), a link to a consumer-friendly document that clearly explains the hospital’s charity care policy).
- The hospital shall accept the discounted cash price as payment in full from any patient that chooses to pay in cash without regard to the patient’s coverage. “(iv) The payer-specific negotiated charges, expressed as a dollar amount and clearly associated with the name of the applicable third party payer and name of each plan, that apply to each such item or service when provided in, as applicable, the inpatient setting and outpatient department setting.
- “(v) The de-identified maximum and minimum negotiated charges, as applicable, for each such item or service, expressed as a non-zero dollar amount.
- Such amount shall not exceed— “(I) in the case of a hospital with 30 or fewer beds, $300 per day; “(II) in the case of a hospital with more than 30 beds but fewer than 101 beds, $10 per bed per day (or, in the case of such a hospital that has been noncompliant with such requirements for a 1-year period or longer, beginning with the first day following such 1-year period, $12.50 per bed per day); “(III) in the case of a hospital with more than 100 beds but fewer than 301 beds, $15 per bed per day (or, in the case of such a hospital that has been noncompliant with such requirements for a 1-year period or longer, beginning with the first day following such 1-year period, $17.50 per bed per day); “(IV) in the case of a hospital with more than 300 beds but fewer than 501 beds, $20 per bed per day (or, in the case of such a hospital that has been noncompliant with such requirements for a 1-year period or longer, beginning with the first day following such 1-year period, $25 per bed per day); and “(V) in the case of a hospital with more than 500 beds, $25 per bed per day (or, in the case of such a hospital that has been noncompliant with such requirements for a 1-year period or longer, beginning with the first day following such 1-year period, $35 per bed per day). “(ii) INCREASE AUTHORITY.—In applying this subparagraph with respect to violations occurring in 2027 or a subsequent year, the Secretary may through notice and comment rulemaking increase— “(I) the limitation on the per day amount of any penalty applicable to a hospital under clause (i)(I); “(II) the limitations on the per bed per day amount of any penalty applicable under any of subclauses (II) through (V) of clause (i); and “(III) the limitation on the increase of any penalty applied under clause (iii) pursuant to the amounts specified in subclause (II) of such clause. “(iii) PERSISTENT NONCOMPLIANCE.
- , the amount specified in this subclause is, with respect to a hospital— “(aa) with more than 30 beds but fewer than 101 beds, an amount that is not less than $500,000 and not more than $1,000,000; “(bb) with more than 100 beds but fewer than 301 beds, an amount that is greater than $1,000,000 and not more than $2,000,000; “(cc) with more than 300 beds but fewer than 501 beds, an amount that is greater than $2,000,000 and not more than $4,000,000; and “(dd) with more than 500 beds, and amount that is not less than $5,000,000 and not more than $10,000,000. “(iv) PROVISION OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary may, to the extent practicable, provide technical assistance relating to compliance with the provisions of this section to hospitals requesting such assistance.
3. Increasing price transparency of clinical diagnostic laboratory tests under the medicare program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Starting January 1, 2025, clinical laboratories that receive payments from health plans must make detailed price information about laboratory tests available on their websites. This includes lists of test prices, explanations of bills, and negotiated rates with insurers, all to help consumers understand costs better. If they don't comply, they could face penalties.
Money References
- (B) The gross charge, as applicable, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service.
- “(C) The discounted cash price, as applicable, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service (or, in the case no discounted cash price is available for an item or service, the minimum cash price accepted by the laboratory from self-pay individuals for such item or service when provided in such settings for the previous three years, expressed as a dollar amount, as well as, with respect to prices made public pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii), a link to a consumer-friendly document that clearly explains the laboratory’s charity care policy).
- “(D) The payer-specific negotiated charges, expressed as a dollar amount and clearly associated with the name of the applicable third party payer and name of each plan, that apply to each such item or service when provided in, as applicable, the inpatient setting and outpatient department setting.
- “(E) The de-identified maximum and minimum negotiated charges, as applicable, for each such item or service, expressed as a non-zero dollar amount.
- “(5) ENFORCEMENT.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case that the Secretary determines that an applicable laboratory is not in compliance with paragraph (1)— “(i) not later than 30 days after such determination, the Secretary shall notify such laboratory of such determination; and “(ii) if such laboratory continues to fail to comply with such paragraph after the date that is 90 days after such notification is sent, the Secretary may impose a civil monetary penalty in an amount not to exceed $300 for each (beginning with the day on which the Secretary first determined that such laboratory was failing to comply with such paragraph) during which such failure is ongoing.
4. Imaging transparency Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Beginning January 1, 2025, healthcare providers and suppliers must publicly share the prices of certain imaging services, ensuring this information is updated annually and easily accessible online. The Secretary of Health and Human Services will monitor compliance and enforce penalties for violations, with penalties potentially increasing over time, and will provide technical assistance to aid in compliance efforts.
Money References
- “(B) The gross charge, as applicable, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service.
- “(C) The discounted cash price, as applicable, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service (or, in the case no discounted cash price is available for an item or service, the minimum cash price accepted by the provider of services or supplier from self-pay individuals for such item or service when provided in such settings for the previous three years, expressed as a dollar amount, as well as, with respect to prices made public pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii), a link to a consumer-friendly document that clearly explains the provider of services or supplier’s charity care policy).
- The provider of services or supplier shall accept the discounted cash price as payment in full from any patient that chooses to pay in cash without regard to the patient’s coverage. “(D) The payer-specific negotiated charges, expressed as a dollar amount and clearly associated with the name of the applicable third party payer and name of each plan, that apply to each such item or service when provided in, as applicable, the inpatient setting and outpatient department setting.
- “(E) The de-identified maximum and minimum negotiated charges, as applicable, for each such item or service, expressed as a non-zero dollar amount.
- — “(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case that the Secretary determines that a provider of services or supplier is not in compliance with paragraph (1)— “(i) not later than 30 days after such determination, the Secretary shall notify such provider or supplier of such determination; “(ii) upon request of the Secretary, such provider or supplier shall submit to the Secretary, not later than 45 days after the date of such request, a corrective action plan to comply with such paragraph; and “(iii) if such provider or supplier continues to fail to comply with such paragraph after the date that is 90 days after such notification is sent (or, in the case of such a provider or supplier that has submitted a corrective action plan described in clause (ii) in response to a request so described, after the date that is 90 days after such submission), the Secretary may impose a civil monetary penalty in an amount not to exceed $300 for each day (beginning with the day on which the Secretary first determined that such provider or supplier was failing to comply with such paragraph) during which such failure to comply or failure to submit is ongoing.
5. Ambulatory surgical center price transparency requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Beginning January 1, 2025, ambulatory surgical centers must publicly share their service prices in a user-friendly format, making them easily accessible online for free, with the oversight of the Secretary of Health and Human Services ensuring compliance and enforcing penalties for noncompliance. This requirement aims to enhance transparency by providing detailed pricing information, including cash discounts and negotiated rates with insurers, helping consumers compare healthcare costs more effectively.
Money References
- “(ii) The gross charge, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service.
- “(iii) The discounted cash price, expressed as a dollar amount, for each such item or service (or, in the case no discounted cash price is available for an item or service, the minimum cash price accepted by the specified ambulatory surgical center from self-pay individuals for such item or service when provided in such settings for the previous three years, expressed as a dollar amount, as well as, with respect to prices made public pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii), a link to a consumer-friendly document that clearly explains the provider of services or supplier’s charity care policy).
- “(iv) The payer-specific negotiated charges, expressed as a dollar amount and clearly associated with the name of the applicable third party payer and name of each plan, that apply to each such item or service when provided in, as applicable, the inpatient setting and outpatient department setting.
- “(v) The de-identified maximum and minimum negotiated charges, as applicable, for each such item or service, expressed as a non-zero dollar amount.
- (B) CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY.— “(i) IN GENERAL.—A specified ambulatory surgical center that has received a notification under subparagraph (A)(i) and fails to comply with the requirements of this subsection by the date that is 90 days after such notification (or, in the case of an ambulatory surgical center that has submitted a corrective action plan described in subparagraph (A)(ii) in response to a request so described, by the date that is 90 days after such submission) shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty of an amount specified by the Secretary for each day (beginning with the day on which the Secretary first determined that such hospital was not complying with such requirements) during which such failure is ongoing (not to exceed $300 per day). “(ii) INCREASE AUTHORITY.—In applying this subparagraph with respect to violations occurring in 2027 or a subsequent year, the Secretary may through notice and comment rulemaking increase the limitation on the per day amount of any penalty applicable to a specified ambulatory surgical center under clause (i).
6. Strengthening health coverage transparency requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines changes to the health coverage transparency rules in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. It mandates that health plans offer more detailed information on coverage, costs, and provider rates both online and through other means, and to regularly update and make this information publicly available by 2025.
Money References
- “(I) With respect to each item or service for which benefits are available under such plan (expressed as a dollar amount), including prescription drugs, identified by CPT, HCPCS, DRG, NDC, or other applicable nationally recognized identifier, including any applicable code modifiers, and accompanied by a brief description of the item or service, the in-network rate in effect as of the date of the submission of such information with each provider (identified by national provider identifier) that is a participating provider with respect to such item or service, other than such a rate in effect with a provider that has submitted no claims for such item or service to such plan.
- “(aa) The in-network rate (expressed as a dollar amount), including the individual and total amounts for any bundled rates, in effect as of the first day of the month in which such information is made public with each provider that is a participating provider with respect to such drug.
- “(bb) The historical net price paid by such plan (net of rebates, discounts, and price concessions) (expressed as a dollar amount) for such drug dispensed or administered during the 90-day period beginning 180 days before such date of submission to each provider that was a participating provider with respect to such drug, broken down by each such provider (identified by national provider identifier), other than such an amount paid to a provider that has submitted no claims for such drug to such plan.
- “(III) With respect to each item or service for which benefits are available under such plan (expressed as a dollar amount), identified by CPT, DRG, HCPCS, NDC, or other applicable nationally recognized identifier, including any applicable code modifiers, and accompanied by a brief description of the item or service, the amount billed or charged by the provider, and the amount allowed by the plan, for each such item or service furnished during the 90-day period beginning 180 days before such date of submission by each provider that was not a participating provider with respect to such item or service, broken down by each such provider (identified by national provider identifier), other than items and services with respect to which no claims for such item or service were submitted to such plan during such period. “(iii) MANNER OF SUBMISSION.—Rate and payment information required to be submitted and made available under this subparagraph shall be so submitted and so made available as follows:
- “(II) Requirements specified by the Secretary through rulemaking shall ensure that: “(aa) Such files are limited to an appropriate size, are made available in a widely available format that allows for information contained in such files to be compared across health plans, and are accessible to individuals at no cost and without the need to establish a user account or provider other credentials. “(bb) The rates, amounts, and prices to be disclosed include contractual terms containing calculation formulae, pricing methodologies, and other information necessary to determine the dollar value of reimbursement.
7. Increasing group health plan access to health data Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill mandates that contracts between group health plans and service providers, like healthcare facilities or pharmacy benefit managers, must allow health plans access to all claims and encounter information to ensure accuracy of payments and comply with laws. It outlines penalties for violations and requires compliance with privacy rules, ensuring that plans can review the information needed for transparency and quality assurance.
Money References
- “(iii) The contractual terms containing calculation formulae, pricing methodologies, and other information used to determine the dollar value of reimbursement.
- , the Secretary may assess a civil penalty against such provider, network or association, service provider offering access to a network of providers, third-party administrator, pharmacy benefit manager, or other service provider in the amount of $10,000 for each day during which such violation continues.
8. Preemption only in event of conflict Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that sections 2 to 5 of this Act will not override state laws about health care price transparency unless those state laws interfere with the Act's requirements. It clarifies that the section does not impact health plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.