Overview

Title

To support empowerment, economic security, and educational opportunities for adolescent girls around the world, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 3535 is a plan to help girls around the world go to school, feel safe, and have better chances to make money when they grow up. It wants different parts of the U.S. government to work together and let people know how well they’re doing in making these good changes for girls.

Summary AI

S. 3535 aims to empower adolescent girls around the world by supporting their access to quality secondary education, fostering their economic security, and ensuring educational opportunities. The bill highlights the importance of removing barriers such as harmful social norms, safety issues, and financial obstacles that prevent girls from continuing their education. It mandates collaboration among U.S. government agencies and calls for the development and regular updating of a global strategy to improve educational opportunities for girls. Furthermore, it requires transparent reporting to Congress on the progress and impact of these efforts.

Published

2023-12-14
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2023-12-14
Package ID: BILLS-118s3535is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
2,089
Pages:
11
Sentences:
42

Language

Nouns: 625
Verbs: 130
Adjectives: 143
Adverbs: 26
Numbers: 68
Entities: 98

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.53
Average Sentence Length:
49.74
Token Entropy:
5.11
Readability (ARI):
28.00

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The proposed legislation, titled the "Keeping Girls in School Act," seeks to empower adolescent girls worldwide by enhancing their access to education and economic opportunities. Introduced in the Senate, this bill emphasizes the importance of providing quality secondary education to girls, recognizing it as a fundamental right that promotes gender equality, economic growth, and community stability. To achieve this, the bill outlines a framework involving United States agencies, international organizations, and governments to address barriers that prevent girls from accessing education. These barriers include harmful social norms, safety issues, and financial constraints.

Summary of Significant Issues

While the bill presents a noble cause, it contains several significant issues. Primarily, the absence of specific budgetary constraints suggests potential overspending or inefficiencies in resource allocation. The vague language used throughout the bill, such as "empowering environments" and "holistically support," lacks clarity, making it challenging to ensure clear implementation and accountability. Additionally, the bill does not specify the metrics for evaluating its success, raising concerns about how its effectiveness will be assessed. Furthermore, the requirement for consultation with various stakeholders leaves room for interpretation, which could result in inconsistent applications.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to have a positive impact on society by promoting gender equity and educational opportunities for girls globally. Educating girls can have far-reaching effects, such as reducing poverty rates, enhancing economic growth, and promoting healthier, more stable communities. However, the general lack of financial clarity and specific evaluation criteria could bring about challenges in ensuring the efficient use of resources, leaving taxpayers uncertain about the true impact of their funds.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For adolescent girls, the bill promises increased access to quality secondary education and supportive measures to overcome specific barriers. If effectively implemented, this could transform the lives of many girls, particularly in regions where they traditionally face educational disadvantages. On the other hand, educational institutions and local governments, especially in developing countries, might experience administrative and logistical challenges in aligning with the bill's mandates without clear guidance or guaranteed resources.

For U.S. government agencies, the bill mandates coordination and oversight responsibilities that could lead to potential bureaucratic overlap, complicating the enactment of effective programs due to the broad language and lack of designated lead roles. Therefore, while the intentions of the bill are positive, its successful implementation will depend greatly on additional clarifications and refinements in how these initiatives are practically carried out.

Issues

  • The lack of specific budgetary constraints or cost estimates in Section 4 could lead to potential overspending or wasteful allocation of resources, which is a significant financial issue for the general public.

  • The broad and vague language used in Sections 3 and 4, such as 'empowering environments' and 'holistically support safe, inclusive, and quality educational opportunities,' lacks precise definition, which may hinder clear implementation and accountability, raising both legal and ethical concerns.

  • Section 4 also mentions 'context-specific, evidence-based analysis' without specifying how this evidence should be gathered or analyzed, leading to potential inconsistencies and effectiveness issues, highlighting ethical concerns about transparency and accountability.

  • There is no explicit mention of metrics or criteria for assessing the success or impact of the updated strategy and agency implementation plans in Section 5, which could lead to challenges in evaluating their effectiveness, reflecting political and ethical accountability issues.

  • The section on 'Transparency and reporting to Congress' (Section 6) does not specify any specific metrics or standards for how the activities should be monitored and evaluated, leading to ambiguity or inconsistency in reports, which is both a legal and political concern.

  • The requirement for consultation 'to the extent possible' in Section 5 leaves room for interpretation and may lead to inconsistent application or oversight, presenting a legal concern regarding the execution of the consultation process.

  • The bill's overall complexity and legal jargon, particularly noted in Section 6, might make it difficult for the general public to understand, raising ethical issues around transparency and accessibility.

  • Section 5 lacks specification on funding sources or budget allocations for the Global Strategy updates, which could lead to budgetary ambiguities and financial implications.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act is titled the “Keeping Girls in School Act.” It includes the main topics of the Act, which are outlined in the table of contents, such as definitions, the sense of Congress, secondary education for adolescent girls, the requirement for a global strategy, and transparency and reporting to Congress.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, specifying that "Administrator" refers to the head of USAID, "appropriate congressional committees" include specific committees from the Senate and the House, "Secretary" means the Secretary of State, and "USAID" stands for the United States Agency for International Development.

3. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The sense of Congress is that all children should have equal access to quality education, and that educating girls is vital for their future and their communities' stability. The U.S. has led globally in promoting education for marginalized groups, and improving girls' education aligns with advancing gender equality and economic growth, while also helping reduce violence and instability.

4. Secondary education for adolescent girls Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section focuses on promoting secondary education for adolescent girls around the world by addressing barriers like harmful social norms, safety concerns, and costs. It authorizes the Secretary and the Administrator to create agreements and programs that improve educational access, employ monitoring and evaluation methods, and coordinate efforts across government agencies to support girls' education and empowerment in alignment with existing U.S. strategies.

5. Global strategy requirement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary, along with various U.S. agencies and organizations, is required to update and submit a strategy to empower adolescent girls, focusing on secondary education, within one year of the Act’s enactment and again after five years. In doing so, they must consult with federal departments, congressional committees, and relevant civil society groups.

6. Transparency and reporting to Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary, working with the Administrator, to report to Congress within a year and every two years after that for 10 years, detailing activities under the Act and how they are monitored. These reports must also be made available to the public on a searchable website managed by USAID.