Overview

Title

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the establishment of a Task Force on Youth Mental Health Data Integration.

ELI5 AI

S. 3532 wants to gather experts and groups to help understand and improve how we keep track of kids' mental health, making sure the information is used carefully and safely. It wants to bring people together to make a smart plan for helping kids feel better, but it will only be around for five years.

Summary AI

S. 3532 aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to establish a Task Force on Youth Mental Health Data Integration. This task force will develop a national strategy to improve data systems for understanding youth mental health needs and services. It will consist of members from various federal departments, agencies, and non-federal entities, including representatives from medical societies and nonprofit organizations. The task force will focus on data integration, surveillance, and evaluation of youth mental health trends, services, and technology impacts, and will sunset five years after its establishment.

Published

2023-12-14
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2023-12-14
Package ID: BILLS-118s3532is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,780
Pages:
9
Sentences:
31

Language

Nouns: 574
Verbs: 98
Adjectives: 112
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 47
Entities: 92

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.12
Average Sentence Length:
57.42
Token Entropy:
5.05
Readability (ARI):
29.86

AnalysisAI

General Summary

This bill, introduced in the 118th Congress, seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act by establishing a "Task Force on Youth Mental Health Data Integration." The initiative is prompted by the need to improve the way the federal government collects and utilizes data concerning youth mental health. The task force is a collaborative effort, bringing together various federal departments and non-government members. Its primary mandate is to design a national strategy to enhance data sharing and improve mental health services for young people. This strategy emphasizes understanding mental health needs, ensuring privacy, and engaging relevant organizations and communities.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several potential issues arise from the bill's provisions. The bill grants significant discretion to the Secretary of Health and Human Services in designating federal departments and agencies, which may lead to concerns about favoritism or inadequate oversight. Furthermore, the absence of specific funding allocations raises questions about the efficient and effective use of resources. The complexity of the language surrounding the roles and processes of the task force also poses a barrier to public understanding.

Data privacy is a critical concern, especially regarding how sensitive information about youth in the juvenile justice and child welfare systems is handled. Despite assurances of 'appropriate protections,' the specifics remain vague. With numerous federal entities involved, another concern is potential bureaucratic inefficiencies that could increase costs and delay objectives. Finally, the unclear criteria for choosing non-federal members could lead to transparency and favoritism concerns.

Impact on the Public

The bill could have broad implications for the public, particularly young people and their families, by improving the mental health services they receive. If the task force's strategies to integrate data and enhance service delivery are successful, it could lead to more timely and effective mental health interventions. However, these benefits depend heavily on the clarity and adequacy of privacy protections and data handling practices.

The public might also be affected by the potential inefficiencies and cost implications associated with the task force's extensive federal involvement. Without clear funding and cost estimates, there is a risk of resource allocation that doesn't fully address the needed outcomes.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Youth and Families: The primary beneficiaries of the bill, young people with mental health needs, could benefit from improved services and data systems that better capture and respond to their conditions. However, the impact on privacy and how data might affect their interactions with systems such as juvenile justice remain a concern.

Federal Agencies and Nonprofits: These entities would play critical roles in the task force. While they stand to gain from improved data systems that enhance their service delivery, they also face the challenge of navigating the complexities and potential inefficiencies of a multi-agency approach.

Healthcare Providers and Researchers: By engaging in public-private research partnerships and accessing improved data, these stakeholders could advance understanding and treatment of youth mental health. Yet, they might also encounter challenges due to the complexities in integrating diverse information systems and protecting patient confidentiality.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to address important gaps in the collection and use of youth mental health data, its effectiveness will depend on resolving significant issues related to oversight, resource allocation, transparency, and data privacy.

Issues

  • The section on the 'Task Force on Youth Mental Health' (SEC. 2) allows for significant discretion in the inclusion of 'such other Federal departments and agencies as the Secretary determines appropriate', which could lead to concerns about favoritism or lack of oversight.

  • The absence of specific funding information in SEC. 2 and SEC. 317L–2 leaves spending allocations unclear, potentially leading to discretionary and inefficient use of resources.

  • The complexity of language throughout SEC. 2 and SEC. 317L–2, particularly regarding the roles and processes of the Task Force, may make it difficult for the general public to understand the implications of the bill.

  • Data privacy concerns arise from the handling and integration of sensitive data concerning youth in the juvenile justice and child welfare systems, as described in SEC. 317L–2(c)(1), despite assurances of 'appropriate protections'.

  • The bill outlines extensive involvement of numerous Federal departments and agencies (SEC. 317L–2(b)(2)), which may lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and increased costs, potentially delaying the Task Force's objectives.

  • SEC. 317L–2 lacks clear criteria for selecting non-Federal members, raising transparency concerns and potential issues related to favoritism in SEC. 317L–2(b)(3).

  • There is no explicit cost estimate or budget allocation in SEC. 317L–2 for the development and maintenance of data systems and a public-facing website, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act is titled "Short title" and states that the Act can be referred to as the “Youth Mental Health Data Act of 2023”.

2. Task force on youth mental health Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill establishes a Task Force on Youth Mental Health Data Integration to improve how the government collects and uses data about youth mental health. The Task Force, made up of federal and non-federal members, will create a national strategy to better understand mental health needs, improve data sharing, and enhance mental health services for young people, while ensuring privacy and engaging relevant organizations and communities.

317L–2. Task Force on Youth Mental Health Data Integration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Youth Mental Health Data Integration Task Force is established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to improve how data on youth mental health is collected and used across federal systems. It will consist of government and non-government members and is tasked with developing a national strategy to integrate data, innovate research partnerships, track health records usage, and create a website for public access to mental health information. The Task Force will submit annual reports and will operate for five years.