Overview
Title
To increase the potential penalty for property damage at the National Gallery of Art and certain other buildings and grounds.
ELI5 AI
S. 3483 is a new idea suggested by some people in the Senate to make the punishment bigger for anyone who damages properties like the National Gallery of Art. They want to double the fine they have to pay if they cause damage.
Summary AI
S. 3483 aims to increase the potential penalty for causing property damage at the National Gallery of Art and certain other buildings and grounds. The bill proposes changing Section 6307(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, by raising the possible fine from five to ten units. This legislation is referred to as the "Consequences for Climate Vandals Act." The bill was introduced in the Senate by Mr. Vance and Mr. Braun and has been referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled S. 3483, aims to increase the penalties for property damage specifically at the National Gallery of Art and other federal buildings and grounds. Introduced in the Senate by Mr. Vance and Mr. Braun, this bill seeks to amend Section 6307(b)(1) of title 40 in the United States Code by doubling the maximum fine from five thousand dollars to ten thousand dollars. The act is designated as the “Consequences for Climate Vandals Act.”
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise with the provisions of this bill. Firstly, the increase in penalties from five thousand to ten thousand dollars is not accompanied by a detailed justification or rationale for the change, leaving questions about the necessity and effectiveness of the increase. Additionally, the bill does not clarify the utilization of the potentially increased funds from fines, potentially leading to concerns about transparency and accountability. The term "Climate Vandals," used in the act's title, is subjective and lacks a clear definition, possibly leading to various interpretations and legal uncertainties. Furthermore, there is no context or evidence provided regarding the current effectiveness of existing penalties, making it difficult to assess whether the increase addresses any real deficiencies.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill signals a stricter federal stance against property damage at protected sites, such as the National Gallery of Art. The increased penalties may serve as a deterrent, potentially reducing incidents of vandalism in these culturally significant and federally protected areas. However, the lack of clarity about the use of collected fines raises questions about the broader benefits for the community or the preservation of these sites.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders such as federal authorities responsible for the maintenance of the National Gallery of Art and similar sites may benefit from increased funding, which could be used for improved security measures or restoration projects. Nevertheless, the bill's lack of specificity regarding fund utilization means these benefits are speculative. Potential offenders, including protestors labeled as "Climate Vandals," could face harsher financial consequences, which could dissuade demonstrations involving property damage. This stricter penalty approach could be seen as positive by those favoring stronger legal enforcement, but might result in criticism from groups concerned about civil liberties and the potential for overreach in prosecuting property damage cases.
In summary, while the intent to protect historical and cultural sites is clear, the lack of detailed context and provisions regarding the implementation of this bill could lead to confusion and varied impacts among different sectors of the public and stakeholders.
Issues
The amendment to Section 6307(b)(1) in Section 2 increases penalties but lacks a justification or explanation for the increase from 'five' to 'ten', which may raise concerns about the rationale and necessity of the change.
The increase in penalties in Section 2 does not address how these additional funds will be utilized, possibly leading to issues of transparency and accountability in fund allocation.
The title 'Consequences for Climate Vandals Act' in Section 1 could be considered subjective or vague, as the term 'Climate Vandals' is not clearly defined, which might result in broad interpretation and legal uncertainties.
Section 2 does not provide context or evidence regarding the current effectiveness of penalties for property damage, making it unclear whether the increase in penalties addresses any existing deficiencies or problems.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section gives a name to the act, allowing it to be referred to as the "Consequences for Climate Vandals Act."
2. Penalties for property damage at the National Gallery of Art and certain other buildings and grounds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the penalty for property damage at the National Gallery of Art and certain other federal buildings by increasing the maximum fine from five thousand dollars to ten thousand dollars.