Overview
Title
To extend the prohibition on providing airport improvement grant funds to certain entities that have violated intellectual property rights of United States entities.
ELI5 AI
This bill is like a rule that says certain people or groups can't get money to fix airports if they've been caught copying ideas that belong to others in the U.S., and it wants to keep this rule for one more year until 2024 instead of ending it in 2023.
Summary AI
S. 3473, titled the “Air Security Act of 2023,” was introduced to extend a rule from the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act. This rule prohibits giving airport improvement grant funds to certain entities that have violated the intellectual property rights of U.S. entities. The bill changes the expiration date of this prohibition from 2023 to 2024, effectively extending it for one more year.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed legislation, titled the "Air Security Act of 2023," aims to extend the timeframe during which certain entities are denied access to airport improvement grant funds. This restriction applies to entities that have previously been found to violate the intellectual property rights of United States entities. Originally set to expire in 2023, this bill seeks to extend the prohibition until the end of 2024. It is an amendment to a previous act, specifically the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues surrounding this legislation is its potential failure to consider whether the targeted entities have resolved their intellectual property violations. Extending the restriction without updating the evaluation of these entities could result in the unfair exclusion of those who may have rectified their practices. Furthermore, the bill references a specific section of a prior law, which may not be well understood without thorough knowledge of that law. This could hinder comprehensive understanding and proper scrutiny by legislators and stakeholders unfamiliar with the original act.
Impact on the Public
The Bill's impact on the general public might be minimal at first glance because it deals with airport improvement grants—a topic that appears remote from the daily concerns of most individuals. However, the broader implications do touch on public interests. Ensuring that only entities respecting intellectual property laws receive funding can foster a fair economic environment, potentially impacting innovation positively. Conversely, the exclusion of entities based on outdated information might deny communities vital improvements to airport infrastructure, indirectly affecting public welfare and efficiency in air travel.
Impact on Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders such as airport authorities, entities involved in airport construction and improvement, and businesses in the aviation sector are likely to be more directly impacted by this legislation. For entities in compliance with intellectual property laws, the bill represents a protective measure that ensures fair competition. However, for those who have made adjustments to rectify prior violations, the extension could be seen as unjust and restrictive, denying them opportunities for funding based on past conduct which they might have corrected.
The legislative proposal also underscores the importance of regularly updating and reviewing the status of entities against current intellectual property standards. Policymakers and regulatory bodies may need to consider the introduction of mechanisms for reassessing compliance statuses to ensure the fair allocation of government funds and support innovation and competition ethics.
Issues
The amendment proposed in Section 2 to extend the prohibition period from 2023 to 2024 may not take into account whether the targeted entities have rectified their intellectual property violations, which could lead to a misallocation of airport improvement grant funds if the most current information about these entities is not considered. This raises potential concerns about fairness and effectiveness in addressing the issue of intellectual property violations.
Section 2's reference to a specific section of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 might be easily overlooked or misunderstood without detailed knowledge of that prior act, potentially limiting comprehension and scrutiny among legislators or stakeholders who are not familiar with the original text.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is called the "Short title." It states that the official name of this legislation is the “Air Security Act of 2023.”
2. Extension of prohibition on provision of airport improvement grant funds to certain entities that have violated intellectual property rights of United States entities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section extends the time period during which some entities are prohibited from receiving airport improvement grants due to past violations of U.S. intellectual property rights, changing the end date from 2023 to 2024.