Overview
Title
To require a certain percentage of natural gas and crude oil exports be transported on United States-built and United States-flag vessels, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023 is a plan to make sure more ships carrying natural gas and oil from the United States are built and sail under the American flag. This means they want to use more American-made ships and help train people in the U.S. to work on them.
Summary AI
The Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023 requires that a portion of natural gas and crude oil exports be transported using vessels that are both built and flagged in the United States. The bill sets specific targets that gradually increase the percentage of such exports over several years, aiming to boost American shipbuilding and worker training. Key requirements include using U.S.-manufactured components for vessel construction and offering training opportunities for American mariners. It includes exceptions and waiver provisions if meeting the requirements leads to significant cost increases or production delays.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023," aims to prioritize the use of United States-built and United States-flagged vessels for the transportation of natural gas and crude oil exports. Implemented over a schedule spanning several years, specific percentages of these exports must be transported on vessels that meet detailed requirements laid out in the bill. The bill also provides for waivers under certain circumstances and mandates opportunities for U.S. mariners to gain experience on these vessels. Furthermore, it grants the Secretary of Energy the duty to collect and disseminate information about these exports, creating an informed basis for the enforcement of the policy.
Significant Issues
One of the most significant issues raised by this bill is its potential to favor U.S. shipbuilding interests at the expense of international competition. By requiring exports to be transported on specifically defined U.S. vessels, it could raise the costs of exporting natural gas and crude oil. This protectionist measure may also affect trade relations by limiting the involvement of foreign shipbuilders. Additionally, the increasing percentage requirements for U.S.-compliant vessels might present challenges to infrastructure capacity, posing logistical and financial burdens on exporters.
Another issue is the bill's waiver provisions, which allow for flexibility if domestic manufacturing capabilities are insufficient. However, the subjective nature of these determinations might lead to inconsistencies and delays. Furthermore, the complexity of the bill’s legal wording could make it less accessible to stakeholders, which might hinder public understanding and compliance.
Impact on the Public
The public may perceive this bill as a move to bolster domestic industries, particularly U.S. shipbuilding and maritime labor. This could increase national employment in these sectors over time. However, the increased costs involved in ensuring compliance with the vessel requirements could eventually lead to higher energy prices, impacting consumers indirectly.
The bill’s requirements for U.S.-built vessels may also limit the flexibility of exporters in choosing the most economically efficient options, potentially resulting in higher costs passed down to consumers. In the long run, reliance on federal information for policy enforcement could streamline operations, although the provision for using private data sources, when necessary, raises concerns about the consistency and impartiality of the data used.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
U.S. Shipbuilders and Mariners: The bill stands to significantly benefit U.S. shipbuilders and mariners by ensuring more domestic building and retrofitting projects as well as increasing training and employment opportunities for U.S. mariners. Such stakeholders might view this legislation as a positive development promoting industry growth and job creation within the United States.
Energy Exporters: Exporters may experience increased operational costs and logistical complications as they adapt to compliance with new regulations over time. The progressive percentage requirements could strain existing capacities and necessitate significant upfront investments in U.S.-compliant vessels.
International Trading Partners: Partner countries could see the legislation as a restrictive measure that complicates trade relationships, especially those affected by exceptions based on free trade agreements. Countries that do not benefit from these exceptions might perceive a disadvantage in trade negotiations.
Regulatory Bodies: For entities like the Energy Information Administration, this bill introduces new responsibilities for collecting and publicizing data, which could improve transparency and decision-making. However, there is a potential for confusion regarding the roles within these agencies, which might result in inefficiencies if not addressed clearly.
In summary, while the "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023" offers several potential benefits to domestic industries and the workforce, it also presents notable challenges around implementation, consistency, and international trade relations. Addressing these issues thoughtfully will be crucial for the bill's effective integration into the broader economic and regulatory landscape.
Issues
The requirement for transporting natural gas and crude oil on vessels documented under the laws of the United States may favor U.S. shipbuilding interests, potentially limiting competition from foreign shipbuilders. This could lead to increased costs and a focus on domestic economic interests at the expense of international trade relations. (Section 2)
The percentage requirements for exporting natural gas and crude oil on U.S.-documented vessels increase over time, potentially imposing unrealistic demands on supply and infrastructure capacity, which could lead to increased costs and logistical challenges for exporters. (Section 2)
The condition for a waiver by the Maritime Administrator based on insufficient domestic manufacturing may lead to delays and inefficiencies if determined subjectively, potentially causing uncertainty and inconsistency in the application of the law. (Section 2)
The exception based on free trade agreements could create inconsistencies in how the law is applied, depending on the trading partner, potentially complicating international trade negotiations and compliance. (Section 2)
The complexity of paragraph structures and legal jargon in the bill may make the sections difficult to understand for non-experts, which could hinder informed public discourse and compliance among stakeholders. (Section 2)
The role of the Secretary and the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration seems to be conflated, which could lead to confusion regarding who is responsible for what actions, potentially impeding effective oversight and accountability. (Section 3)
The language specifying 'calendar year following the calendar year in which this subsection is enacted' could lead to ambiguity if the enactment date is unclear, affecting the timing and planning of compliance measures for stakeholders. (Section 2)
There is no clear mechanism for evaluating or enforcing opportunities for U.S. mariners to receive experience and training, which could result in unequal implementation and missed workforce development opportunities. (Section 2)
The term 'multiyear periods' is vague and could benefit from a more specific definition or guidelines to ensure consistent application, impacting long-term planning and expectations for stakeholders. (Section 3)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act provides its official name, which is the "Energizing American Shipbuilding Act of 2023".
2. National policy on strategic energy asset export transportation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a national policy for exporting strategic energy assets, specifically requiring natural gas and crude oil exports to be transported on vessels built or documented under U.S. laws. Over time, increasing percentages of exports must be carried on these U.S.-compliant vessels. Waivers can be granted if compliance raises costs significantly, causes delays, or if necessary components are unavailable in the U.S. The policy also mandates training opportunities for U.S. mariners, with exceptions for trade agreements that conflict with these conditions.
3. Energy Information Administration information Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Energy, through the Energy Information Administration, must gather and share online information about natural gas and crude oil exports, including forecasts and data for the upcoming years. This includes specific yearly forecasts and potential multiyear forecasts as deemed appropriate.