Overview
Title
To ensure that Federal contractors comply with child labor laws, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants companies working with the government to play fair and not use child workers. If they have broken the rules before, they have to tell the truth and fix things, or else they can't work with the government anymore.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the "Preventing Child Labor Exploitation Act," aims to ensure that federal contractors follow child labor laws. It mandates that companies contracting with federal agencies disclose any violations of child labor laws from the past three years and work with the Secretary of Labor to address such issues. If companies or their subcontractors fail to comply or take corrective measures, they could be barred from receiving federal contracts. The bill also includes provisions for penalties, a government study on child labor issues among federal contractors, and the publication of annual reports on its effectiveness.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, S. 3139, titled the "Preventing Child Labor Exploitation Act," aims to ensure that federal contractors comply with child labor laws. This bill, currently under consideration in the 118th Congress, has been designed to promote accountability among companies doing business with the federal government and to enforce stricter compliance with existing labor laws.
General Summary
The legislation requires entities entering into contracts with federal executive agencies to annually report any violations related to child labor, as outlined in section 12 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. It mandates the Secretary of Labor to oversee compliance and to provide assistance to companies in evaluating their subcontractors' adherence to child labor laws. Entities that demonstrate serious or repeated non-compliance may face severe penalties, including being barred from future federal contracts. The bill further requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a study on child labor among federal contractors and report findings to Congress. Importantly, the bill specifies that no additional funds are to be allocated for its implementation.
Significant Issues
One of the main challenges of this bill rests in its requirement for businesses, including smaller entities and subcontractors, to report any administrative, arbitral, or judicial determinations of labor violations. This could impose significant administrative burdens and discourage smaller businesses from seeking federal contracts due to the complexity and potential costs associated with compliance. Additionally, the criteria for being placed on the list of ineligible entities are somewhat subjective, raising concerns about inconsistent application or unfair treatment of businesses.
The criminal penalty provisions are another point of concern, as they may have disproportionate effects on entities that unintentionally fail to report due to the complexities inherent in the reporting process. Furthermore, the bill's mandate that no additional funds be allocated limits financial flexibility, potentially hindering its effective enforcement.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
This bill's impact on the public is broadly aligned with enhancing protections for children by ensuring strict adherence to child labor laws among federal contractors. By holding businesses accountable, the legislation seeks to foster ethical practices and labor standards, indirectly benefiting communities and consumers who are increasingly concerned about corporate social responsibility.
For specific stakeholders, the bill could present both positive and negative outcomes. Companies already in compliance with labor laws may welcome the legislation as it levels the playing field by penalizing violators, supporting fair competition. However, smaller businesses and subcontractors might bear the weight of increased administrative demands and the associated costs. Legal and consulting firms may see increased demand for guidance as companies navigate the complexities of compliance and reporting standards articulated in the legislation.
The bill's current lack of additional funding could serve as a double-edged sword; while it alleviates taxpayer burden in the short term, it risks underfunding mechanisms essential for the bill's enforcement, potentially undermining its efficacy in protecting child welfare in the labor market.
Issues
The requirement for entities and offerors to disclose administrative merits determination, arbitral award, or civil judgment as per Section 2 may be burdensome for smaller entities or subcontractors, which might discourage their participation in federal contracts.
The criteria for inclusion on the 'list of ineligible entities' due to 'serious, repeated, or pervasive violations' as noted in Section 2 are subjective, potentially leading to inconsistent application and unfair treatment of entities.
The bill as articulated in Sections 2 and 3 does not define how corrective measures are evaluated, leading to enforcement ambiguities and potential unfairness in penalizing entities.
The criminal penalty provisions in Section 2 could harshly impact entities that unintentionally fail to report due to the complexity of reporting processes, echoing broader implications of Section 1031(a) of title 18, United States Code.
The extended timeline for when ineligible entities are reported and sanctioned, spanning more than two years as per Section 2, might allow violative entities to continue operations unchecked.
Section 3's language about certifications from subcontractors introduces complexity and may lead to increased compliance costs and potential misunderstandings.
The bill's ambiguity regarding the assessment of the act's effectiveness in annual reports to Congress, as highlighted in Section 2, could lead to subjective evaluations and obscure accountability.
Section 6 explicitly states that no additional funds will be authorized, potentially compromising the effective implementation of the bill's mandates without sufficient resources.
The allocation and usage of collected civil penalties for violations remain unclear in Section 5, leading to possible accountability issues or reduced effectiveness in enforcement.
There is no clear roadmap in Section 3 for after-study actions based on GAO findings, which can lead to inaction on important insights regarding child labor violations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official title of the Act is the “Preventing Child Labor Exploitation Act.”
2. Promotion of workplace accountability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires companies with government contracts to report violations of labor laws annually and take corrective steps if needed. Those repeatedly failing to comply or correct issues could be banned from future contracts, face penalties, and have their cases reported to Congress.
3. GAO Study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) is required to conduct a study within two years after the law is passed, focusing on the use of child labor by companies that have contracts with the federal government. The findings of this study must then be reported to Congress.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Act mentioned in Section 1 is known as the “Preventing Child Labor Exploitation in Federal Contracting Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” refers to specific committees in the Senate and the House of Representatives that deal with homeland security and governmental affairs, as well as oversight and accountability. The term “executive agency” is defined based on a specific section of the United States Code.
3. Promotion of workplace accountability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires entities with government contracts to certify if they had any child labor violations in the past three years, and to take corrective actions if needed. If they fail to report or correct these violations, they can be penalized and barred from future contracts. The Secretary of Labor must report annually on these efforts, including the effectiveness and number of entities on the non-compliance list.
4. Gao study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study within two years of the enactment of the Act. This study will focus on how often federal contractors violate child labor laws, as outlined in section 12 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, and a report of the findings will be submitted to the relevant Congressional committees.
5. Use of civil penalties collected for child labor law violations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 by removing specific wording related to the use of collected civil penalties for child labor law violations, simplifying the language, and eliminating a particular sentence.
6. No additional funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 6 of the bill, it is stated that no new money will be allocated or authorized for implementing this act.