Overview
Title
To allow a State to submit a declaration of intent to the Secretary of Education to combine certain funds to improve the academic achievement of students.
ELI5 AI
S. 309 is a plan that lets states ask for permission to mix certain money from the government to try new ways to help kids do better in school. States have to explain their idea clearly, and there's a special rule that these ideas get checked in 60 days to make sure everything is fair and helpful for all students.
Summary AI
S. 309 allows states to request permission from the Secretary of Education to combine certain federal funds and manage them with more flexibility to enhance student academic achievement. The bill's objectives include granting states the freedom to improve education reforms, reducing administrative costs of federal education programs, and ensuring accountability, especially for disadvantaged students. It stipulates that states must submit a detailed plan known as a "declaration of intent," and the Secretary must review these plans within 60 days. Furthermore, the bill mandates transparent reporting on student progress and requires coordinated participation of private schools.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, known as the "Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success Act" or the "A PLUS Act," seeks to provide states with the ability to submit a declaration of intent to the Secretary of Education. This would allow them to consolidate certain federal education funds to bolster the academic achievement of students. The bill appears to aim for increased flexibility for states in managing educational funds, focusing resources on improving academic outcomes, and ensuring accountability, especially for disadvantaged students.
General Summary of the Bill
The A PLUS Act is designed to grant states more autonomy in determining how to use federal education funds. The legislation allows states to manage these funds under a consolidated plan, which aims to reduce administrative expenses and compliance burdens. It outlines a process where states submit a "declaration of intent" to propose how they will use the funds, subject to review by the Secretary of Education. The bill emphasizes transparency and accountability, requiring states to inform parents and the public about student progress and how effectively these funds are utilized.
Significant Issues
Several noteworthy concerns emerge from the bill. Firstly, the lack of specific metrics or standards for the added flexibility and accountability could lead to inconsistent application across states. The broad language about removing fiscal and accounting barriers might result in inadequate oversight, allowing inefficiencies or misuse of funds.
Another issue is the provision for "recognition by operation of law," which could enable declarations of intent to be automatically approved if not reviewed in a timely manner by the Secretary. This may lead to insufficient scrutiny of state proposals. Furthermore, the bill lacks detailed criteria for how the Secretary should evaluate these declarations, potentially resulting in varying standards and approaches in different states.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the impact of the A PLUS Act could vary significantly. On the one hand, it could empower states, providing them with the flexibility to tailor educational strategies and reforms that meet local needs. This could lead to innovative approaches in improving student outcomes and reducing achievement gaps, particularly for disadvantaged populations.
On the other hand, the bill’s vague guidelines and insufficient clarity on accountability measures pose risks of inconsistent implementation. Without clear oversight, there is potential for misuse of funding or continuation of ineffective programs, which could negatively affect educational outcomes for students across the nation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
State Governments would gain considerable authority over federal education funds, potentially enabling more tailored and effective educational strategies. However, the increased responsibility also means that states must ensure robust accountability measures to use these funds effectively.
Educational Institutions might benefit from reduced administrative burdens, allowing them to focus more on educational outcomes. Yet, they could face challenges if state-level management lacks clear direction or oversight, leading to unpredictable funding environments.
Parents and Students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, stand to gain from more customized educational strategies if funds are managed effectively. However, there's a risk that without strict accountability, disparities in educational quality and resources could persist or worsen.
Federal Oversight Bodies, such as the Department of Education, might encounter challenges in maintaining consistent standards across states due to the decentralization proposed by the bill. Ensuring equitable use of funds and educational opportunities nationwide could become increasingly complex.
In conclusion, while the A PLUS Act aims to enhance flexibility and focus on educational achievement, its success largely hinges on the implementation of clear, enforceable standards and accountability measures at both the state and federal levels.
Issues
The lack of clear metrics or standards for 'added flexibility' and accountability in Section 2 could lead to inconsistent application and potential misuse of funds by states. This issue is significant as it affects federal oversight and educational outcomes, especially for disadvantaged students.
The broad language concerning the 'removal of fiscal and accounting barriers' in Section 4 could result in insufficient oversight and control over the consolidated funds, potentially leading to misuse or inefficiency in spending.
Section 5 lacks specificity on how states should inform parents and the public about student achievement, which could lead to inconsistent communication and a lack of transparency in public education.
The definition of 'accountability' in Section 3 is vague, possibly leading to inconsistent application or oversight issues, affecting public trust in how educational funds are utilized.
The provision for 'recognition by operation of law' in Section 4 could allow declarations of intent to be approved without thorough review, if the Secretary fails to act within 60 days. This could lead to serious oversight issues.
Section 4 lacks clear criteria or standards for the Secretary to review declarations of intent, which might result in inconsistent assessments across states, impacting the standardization of educational reform implementation.
The duration of the declaration of intent, as discussed in Section 4, is not to exceed 5 years, which might be too long without interim reviews, potentially allowing states to continue with ineffective programs without checks.
Section 7's language on the equitable participation of private schools is vague and does not include specific standards or criteria, potentially leading to inconsistent applications and questions about fairness and adequacy in resource allocation.
Section 6 sets different limits for administrative expenses with a 1 percent limit generally and a 3 percent limit for states not consolidating funds under part A of title I. The rationale behind these limits is unexplained, leading to confusion or perceptions of arbitrariness.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes the short title, officially naming it the “Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success Act” or the “A PLUS Act.”
2. Purposes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the goals of the Act, which are to give more flexibility to States and communities in improving education, to cut down on administrative costs of federal education programs, and to ensure accountability for the academic progress of all students, particularly those who are disadvantaged.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The definitions section of the Act explains the meaning of several terms: "accountability" is about public schools being responsible for their use of funds and reporting progress; "declaration of intent" describes a State's choice to manage federal funds for educational programs; "State" is defined by another law; "State Authorizing Officials" are those who can declare intent on behalf of the State; and "State Designated Officer" is the contact person for federal communication about these responsibilities.
4. Declaration of intent Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines how states can formally declare their intent to receive and use Federal education funds in a consolidated way, ensuring they adhere to specific requirements such as accountability and civil rights. States must list eligible programs and can amend their declarations, which the Secretary of Education must review and approve within 60 days, or else the declaration is automatically approved.
5. Transparency for results of public education Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each State operating under this Act must keep parents and the public informed about student performance and how well students are meeting proficiency standards. Within one year and then annually, the State must release a report with detailed student performance data and explain how federal funds are being used to improve education, close achievement gaps, and help disadvantaged students.
6. Administrative expenses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains the limits on how much money a State can spend on administrative costs from the federal funds they receive. If a State's plan includes all eligible programs, they can use up to 1% for administrative expenses. However, if it doesn't include part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, they can spend up to 3% of the federal funds on these expenses.
7. Equitable participation of private schools Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each state that combines and uses funds as intended by this Act must ensure that private school students and teachers can take part in the funded activities just like private school participants do under section 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.