Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the State of Utah certain Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management within the boundaries of Camp Williams, Utah, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the person in charge of a piece of land in Utah to give that land to the state of Utah. Utah will pay what the land is worth and can keep it as long as it uses it the right way.
Summary AI
S. 3036 requires the Secretary of the Interior to transfer specific federal land, approximately 200.18 acres, located within Camp Williams, Utah, to the State of Utah. This transfer should occur within 90 days after the act becomes law, and Utah must pay the fair market value for this land. The bill specifies the conditions under which this transfer is to be made, including the creation of a map and legal description of the land, and allows for reversion of the land if it is used improperly. The act is referred to as the "Mountain View Corridor Completion Act."
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The bill titled "Mountain View Corridor Completion Act" aims to transfer a specific portion of federal land managed by the Bureau of Land Management to the State of Utah. This land is within the boundaries of Camp Williams, Utah, and covers roughly 200.18 acres. The bill outlines a process where the U.S. Secretary of the Interior is required to convey the land to Utah, provided that the state pays fair market value and respects any existing rights over the land. This land transfer must occur within 90 days of the bill's enactment. Additionally, the bill includes guidelines for finalizing and correcting maps and legal descriptions of the land.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue noted in the bill is the potential for ambiguity and lack of transparency in the land conveyance process. The reason behind transferring this particular federal land to Utah is not elaborated within the bill, which could raise potential concerns about favoritism or lack of transparency in federal land management. Additionally, ambiguity exists surrounding the definition of "valid existing rights" and how fair market value will be determined. These aspects could lead to disputes about recognized rights and the adequacy of compensation that Utah is required to provide.
Moreover, the exclusion of a specific executive order and its modifications without a clear explanation may create confusion about the legislative or administrative precedents being set aside or ignored. The authority granted to the Secretary of the Interior to revert ownership of the land if it's misused by the state is broad and lacks clear criteria for what constitutes unacceptable usage. This lack of specificity may lead to legal challenges or misuse of discretion.
Potential Public Impact
Broadly, this bill may spark discussion and scrutiny regarding federal land management and conveyance practices. For the general public, especially residents of Utah, this transfer might be seen as an opportunity for state-led development projects, potentially spurring local economic growth or infrastructure improvements if the land is used effectively.
However, potential drawbacks include the risk of lack of transparent decision-making and oversight if the conveyance process is not clear-cut. If disputes arise over land value assessments or rights, it could delay any planned development activities, causing public discontent, especially if local infrastructure—an implied part of the "Mountain View Corridor"—is impacted.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders affected by this bill include Utah's state government, local communities near Camp Williams, and federal entities involved in land management. Utah’s government may benefit from acquiring control over land that could be used to address state or local development needs, contributing to economic and community growth. However, ensuring fair compensation and managing public expectations about the land's use will be critical.
Federal agencies, on the other hand, might face challenges in balancing land conveyance requests with preserving federal interests and transparency. If the transfer process is perceived as favorable only to particular states or projects without transparent justification, it could lead to broader implications for federal land administration and policy reform discussions.
The bill may also indirectly affect environmental groups or stakeholders concerned with land conservation, who might argue for clearer commitments to sustainable land use practices by the state. Without these, there is a risk of misuse or overdevelopment that could negatively impact the region's environment and local communities.
Issues
The requirement to convey Bureau of Land Management land to the State of Utah raises potential transparency and favoritism concerns due to the lack of clarity on why this action is necessary. (Section 3)
The determination of 'fair market value' for the land is based on appraisals, which may be subjective and open to manipulation, potentially impacting fair compensation. (Section 3)
There is ambiguity in defining 'valid existing rights', creating room for disputes over the rights recognized during or after the conveyance process. (Section 3)
The map and legal description's reliance as controlling documents bring forth concerns as they could lead to misunderstandings or discrepancies if not adequately aligned or documented. (Section 3)
The exclusion of Executive Order 1922 in relation to the land conveyance could lead to confusion and lack of understanding about the impact of these exclusions without providing a clear rationale. (Section 3)
Authorization for the Secretary to revert land rights if the State misuses the land lacks specific clarity on timelines and criteria for determining acceptable use, which may result in procedural delays or unclear legal grounds. (Section 3)
The definition of 'covered land' may be ambiguous or inaccessible, as it relies on a map that may not be easily available to the public, complicating the understanding of the exact areas affected. (Section 2)
The use of the term 'Secretary' might create confusion due to the potential for multiple individuals holding similar titles, introducing uncertainty regarding who is responsible for specific actions. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the law will be known as the "Mountain View Corridor Completion Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for specific terms used in the bill: "covered land" refers to a specific area of about 200.18 acres shown on a map related to the Mountain View Corridor Completion Act; "Secretary" refers to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, specifically acting through the Bureau of Land Management; and "State" refers to the State of Utah.
3. Conveyance of Bureau of Land Management land to State of Utah Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary to transfer ownership of certain Bureau of Land Management land to the State of Utah within 90 days of the bill's passage. This transfer is contingent on the state respecting existing rights and paying the land's fair market value, and includes provisions for finalizing and correcting a map and legal description of the land, which will be available for public viewing.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act specifies that it should be referred to as the "Mountain View Corridor Completion Act".
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the Act, the term “covered land” refers to about 200.18 acres shown on a specific map for a project called the Mountain View Corridor Completion Act. The “Secretary” refers to the Secretary of the Interior working through the Bureau of Land Management, and the “State” refers to the State of Utah.
3. Conveyance of Bureau of Land Management land to State of Utah Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Secretary to transfer specific land from the Bureau of Land Management to the State of Utah within 90 days, subject to existing rights, and requires the State to pay fair market value based on federal appraisal standards. If the land is sold or misused by the State, the Secretary can reclaim it, and a map and legal description of the land will be finalized and publicly filed.