Overview
Title
To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase death gratuities and funeral allowances for Federal employees, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to give more money to the families of government workers who sadly die doing their jobs, making sure they get enough help for things like funerals and other expenses. It also wants to keep the money amounts fair over time by adjusting them according to the cost of living.
Summary AI
The bill S. 3029, titled the “Honoring Civil Servants Killed in the Line of Duty Act,” seeks to amend title 5 of the United States Code to enhance the compensation provided to the families of federal employees who die in the line of duty. It proposes increasing the death gratuity payment to $100,000, with future adjustments based on economic indices. The bill also raises funeral allowances and includes provisions for additional compensation for employees who die as a result of their service abroad or in connection with an Armed Force. Additionally, it establishes reporting and auditing requirements to ensure transparency in payments made under this legislation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, titled "Honoring Civil Servants Killed in the Line of Duty Act," aims to amend the United States Code to enhance death gratuities and funeral allowances for federal employees who die as a result of injuries sustained while performing their duties. Through this legislative effort, the bill proposes several amendments to existing laws, primarily increasing financial support to the families of deceased federal workers. This reflects an acknowledgment of the service and sacrifice of those working to serve the nation and attempts to provide some financial solace to their grieving families.
Summary of the Bill
This legislative proposal introduces several key measures. First, it raises the death gratuity provided to federal employees to $100,000, subject to annual inflation adjustments. The bill also extends these benefits to families of employees who serve with the Armed Forces and die in service. It further increases funeral allowances from $800 to $8,800, again with annual adjustments to account for inflation. Additionally, the bill establishes an order of precedence determining who should receive these payments, addressing both immediate family members and extended beneficiaries. Furthermore, if agencies are unable to make payments due to extraordinary circumstances like natural disasters, the bill allows for emergency supplemental funds to be made available.
Significant Issues
The bill introduces several issues that warrant careful consideration. The significant hike in funeral expenses, from $800 to $8,800, might raise questions about financial management and justification for such an increase. Meanwhile, the exclusion of stepchildren from benefits may spur concerns about fairness and inequality within blended families. Also notable is the prospective problem of funding adjustments. With the automatic increase of death gratuities tied to economic indices such as the Consumer Price Index, there are potential budgetary implications that may strain government resources over time. Lastly, the complexity surrounding legal language and the potential for discrepancies in benefit entitlements across different federal employees and their families may lead to confusion and disputes.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill seeks to have a positive impact by offering greater financial support to the families of federal employees who have given their lives in service. By increasing the death gratuities and ensuring regular adjustments, the legislation promises to sustain the economic well-being of families who might otherwise face financial insecurity following the loss of a breadwinner. This reflects a societal value placed on honoring civil servants and recognizing the risks they take in their line of work.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the families of federal employees, particularly those who work in high-risk environments, this bill could provide substantial financial relief in times of bereavement, facilitating better support systems and helping with the challenges that come with the loss of a loved one. However, challenges might arise for those managing the federal budget as they address the increase in government obligations resulting from the inflation-pegged adjustments. Legal advisors and estate planners may also face complexities due to the legal intricacies and the potential ambiguity in the definitions of beneficiaries, possibly leading to disputes or misunderstandings.
Overall, while the intent of the bill is commendable in highlighting and valuing the contributions and sacrifices of federal employees, careful consideration of the aforementioned issues is necessary to ensure that execution of the law aligns with its beneficent goals without generating unintended fiscal or legal complications.
Financial Assessment
The "Honoring Civil Servants Killed in the Line of Duty Act" highlights several financial provisions aimed at enhancing compensation for federal employees who die in service. The bill outlines specific financial allocations and adjustments that have potential implications both fiscally and politically.
Death Gratuity Payment Increase
One of the central financial aspects of the bill is the proposed increase in the death gratuity payment for federal employees killed in the line of duty. The legislation stipulates that the gratuity amount shall be $100,000, with future adjustments pegged to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This represents a significant financial commitment by the federal government to the families of fallen employees. The periodic adjustments linked to economic indices like the CPI might address inflation concerns, ensuring the payment remains relevant over time. However, these automatic adjustments could lead to increased government spending, raising potential budgetary concerns over unanticipated financial obligations.
Funeral Expense Adjustments
Another notable financial change is the increase in the funeral allowance from $800 to $8,800. This nearly tenfold rise could spark concerns about potential government waste if the increase isn't adequately justified by inflation or increased costs. The legitimacy of such sharp increases may need to be carefully communicated to avoid perceptions of misuse of federal funds.
Funding for Emergency Situations
The bill also provides for emergency supplemental authorization. This allows agencies potentially unlimited appropriations (“such sums as may be necessary”) in response to events like natural disasters or acts of terrorism. This flexibility is important for swift responses to emergencies but also poses a risk of uncontrollable spending, with significant budgetary implications if not monitored or regulated.
Local Compensation Plans and Funding Adjustments
A noteworthy financial issue involves the potentially varied death gratuity amounts for employees under local compensation plans. This could lead to discrepancies or perceptions of inequity as outlined in the bill, specifically when handling employees' compensation from different jurisdictions or regions. Ensuring equitable compensation across the board can be crucial to maintaining fairness and avoiding controversy.
Index Adjustments and Financial Clarity
While linking benefits to the CPI or Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index offers a method to keep up with inflation, this approach introduces complexity. Public misunderstanding regarding benefit calculations could lead to dissatisfaction due to the opaque nature of these economic adjustments. Maintaining transparency about how these adjustments are calculated and applied is important for public trust.
In summary, while the bill is commendable for its attempt to honor fallen federal employees with increased financial support, the structured financial references, and appropriations must address concerns of potential fiscal strain, perceived inequities, and the intricacies involved in economic indexing to ensure clear public understanding and confidence.
Issues
The significant increase in funeral expenses from '$800' to '$8,800' as mentioned in Section 3 might lead to concerns about government wastefulness if not properly justified by inflation or increased costs. This issue is financially and politically significant as it could be perceived as misuse of federal funds without clear reasoning for such a steep rise.
The exclusion of 'stepchildren' from the definition of 'child' in Sections 2 and 5571 might be seen as unfair to blended families. This legal and ethical issue could leave some dependents unsupported, causing public concern over the perceived inequity in the definitions.
The bill allows potentially unlimited appropriations ('such sums as may be necessary') for emergency supplemental authorization in Section 6, leading to concerns over unmonitored or wasteful spending. This financial and political issue could result in significant budgetary implications if not carefully controlled.
The language concerning 'intoxication of the injured employee' in Section 2 could be interpreted variably, leading to disputes over death causality and eligibility for death gratuities. This is an important legal issue as it could lead to inconsistent applications of the law.
The phrase 'laws of the State in which the employee is domiciled' in ordering the payment recipient in Section 5571 could lead to differing interpretations and outcomes based on state laws, causing inconsistencies in gratuity applications. This legal issue could lead to jurisdictional conflicts regarding the applicability of state laws.
Increased government spending over time due to automatic adjustments in death gratuities based on the Consumer Price Index in Sections 2, 4, and 7, raises potential budgetary concerns. Politically and financially significant, this could lead to unanticipated financial obligations that strain government resources.
The section introducing adjustment of death gratuity for Armed Forces employees in Section 4 may not adequately address funding for these adjustments, raising budgetary concerns about future obligations. This is an important financial issue similar to other adjustment concerns in the bill.
The potential discrepancy in death gratuity amounts for employees under local compensation plans as outlined in Section 2 might cause inconsistencies or perceptions of inequality. This fairness issue could become controversial if employees feel they are not being equitably compensated.
The amendment does not specify the authority for designating 'an alternate person' to receive a payment in Section 4, creating uncertainty if a beneficiary disagrees or there is no formal designation. This legal ambiguity could lead to contested estate or beneficiary claims.
The complexity introduced by the reliance on the Consumer Price Index for benefit calculation adjustments might make it difficult for the general public to understand benefit calculation, leading to misunderstandings or dissatisfaction, as seen in Sections 2, 4, and 7. This is a political issue due to the transparency and clarity required in public policy.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, which is called the “Honoring Civil Servants Killed in the Line of Duty Act”.
2. Increasing death gratuity for Federal employees killed in the line of duty Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text introduces changes to the United States Code to increase the death gratuity for federal employees killed in the line of duty to $100,000, adjusted for inflation. It specifies the order of precedence for payment recipients and amends related laws for consistency.
Money References
- “(2) AMOUNT.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount of a death gratuity paid under paragraph (1) with respect to an employee shall be $100,000, as adjusted each March 1 by the amount determined by the Secretary of Labor to represent the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (all items; United States city average) published for December of the preceding year over that Index published for the December of the year prior to the preceding year, adjusted to the nearest 1⁄10 of 1 percent.
5571. Employee death gratuity payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it explains the conditions under which a US federal government employee’s family might receive a death gratuity payment. If an employee dies due to injuries sustained in the line of duty (and the death wasn’t due to misconduct, intent, or intoxication), their family can receive a $100,000 payment, adjusted for inflation, following an order of precedence starting with a designated beneficiary and extending to the employee’s spouse, children, parents, estate executor, or by state law.
Money References
- (2) AMOUNT.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount of a death gratuity paid under paragraph (1) with respect to an employee shall be $100,000, as adjusted each March 1 by the amount determined by the Secretary of Labor to represent the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (all items; United States city average) published for December of the preceding year over that Index published for the December of the year prior to the preceding year, adjusted to the nearest 1⁄10 of 1 percent. (B) LOCAL COMPENSATION PLANS.—For an employee
3. Funeral expenses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a part of the United States Code to increase funeral expense benefits from $800 to $8,800 and allows for an annual adjustment based on the Secretary of Labor's determined rate. These changes apply to deaths occurring on or after the date the Act is enacted.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Section 8134(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting “(1)” after “(a)”; (2) by striking “$800” and inserting “$8,800”; and (3) by adding at the end the following: “(2) The amount described in paragraph (1) shall be adjusted on March 1 of each year by the percentage amount determined by the Secretary of Labor under section 8146a for that year.”.
4. Death gratuity for injuries incurred in connection with employee’s service with an Armed Force Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the rules for death gratuities related to injuries from federal service with the Armed Forces. It adjusts the gratuity amount annually based on changes in the Consumer Price Index and ensures that the gratuity is not reduced by any other similar federal benefits; if there are no eligible survivors, the payment goes to the deceased’s estate representative.
5. Agency gratuity for deaths sustained in the line of duty abroad Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Foreign Service Act of 1980 to update terms related to death gratuity payments for employees or individuals working abroad who die in the line of duty. It specifies that payments will go to "beneficiaries" instead of "dependents," outlines eligibility criteria, and ensures that these payments are offset by other similar gratuities, with a new definition of "surviving beneficiaries" provided.
6. Emergency supplemental authorization Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, it explains that if a natural disaster, terrorism, or other incident stops a government agency from making certain payments, extra funds can be authorized to help make those payments. The section also states that Congress should act within 30 days after the agency asks for additional funds to address these issues.
7. Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, two parts of the United States Code are updated to replace references to the "Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers" with the "Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index" for calculating certain employee death gratuities.
8. Reporting requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the reporting requirements related to death gratuity payments made by federal agencies. It mandates that agencies notify the Comptroller General within 15 business days of a payment, requires annual reports on these payments to specific Senate and House committees, and calls for an audit within three years to assess the payments and decide on future auditing frequency.