Overview
Title
To establish a competitive grant program to support the establishment, expansion, or enhancement of youth mentoring programs for eligible youth, and to provide for social and emotional learning, employability skill development, career exploration, work-based learning, and other youth workforce opportunities.
ELI5 AI
The "Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025" is a plan to give money to groups that help kids learn important life and job skills through mentoring. This means kids get to learn more about different jobs and how to handle feelings, making them ready for work when they're older.
Summary AI
S. 299, also known as the "Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025," aims to create a competitive grant program to bolster youth mentoring initiatives. This bill focuses on helping eligible youth through mentoring programs that develop their social, emotional, and workforce skills. It allows for partnerships between community organizations, educational institutions, and private entities to offer career exploration, work-based learning, and training for in-demand jobs. Additionally, the bill mandates a study to evaluate the success of these mentoring programs in improving academic and career outcomes for youth.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025" aims to create a competitive grant program to establish, expand, or enhance youth mentoring programs targeted at eligible youth. These programs are designed to provide social and emotional learning, career exploration, and other skills necessary for workforce readiness. The bill outlines the kind of organizations that can receive these grants, the activities funded, and the reporting requirements for these programs. The overarching goal is to improve the potential for success in school and work by providing structured mentoring relationships and skill development activities.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns with the bill is the lack of specific spending limits. It authorizes funds "as may be necessary" for fiscal years 2026 through 2030 without setting a cap, raising potential concerns for financial management. Additionally, the bill lacks clear definitions for terms like "underserved communities," which may lead to inconsistencies in how funds are allocated.
The criteria for determining which entities should receive priority in funding are also not well defined, particularly what constitutes a "greatest need." This absence of specificity could lead to biased or inconsistent distribution of resources. The bill also has general reporting requirements without clear metrics for success, which might limit the ability to evaluate how effective these programs are.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the bill could have a significant positive impact by supporting youth at a vulnerable age with mentorship and skills that enhance their educational and job prospects. These programs could help reduce dropout rates and improve long-term career outcomes for many young people by providing structured support systems.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Young People in Underserved Communities: Youth from these communities stand to benefit the most, as the programs focus on providing guidance to those who might face higher levels of risk due to environmental factors. However, without clear definitions of these communities, there is a risk that some who need help most might not get it.
Mentoring Organizations and Educational Bodies: These entities could see an increase in resources and support, which may allow them to expand their operations. The broad definition of mentoring could either provide flexibility in implementation or lead to inconsistencies.
Taxpayers and Government Oversight Bodies: The open-ended nature of the funding authorization could be concerning to taxpayers who might seek assurances about effective and efficient expenditure of public resources. Entities responsible for overseeing the grants will need to ensure that the money is used effectively without excessive waste.
In conclusion, while the bill presents an admirable goal to bolster youth mentoring, various ambiguities and the lack of specific metrics for evaluating success pose challenges that need to be resolved. Addressing these issues could improve the potential for meaningful, equitable, and accountable program deployment.
Issues
The bill authorizes such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2026 through 2030 without specifying limits in Section 2(i), which could lead to excessive or unregulated spending and financial mismanagement concerns.
There is a lack of specific criteria or detailed explanation for what constitutes 'underserved communities' or 'communities with employment disparities' in Section 2(b)(1)(B) and Section 2(e)(2)(B)(ii), leading to ambiguity in implementation and potential inequality in fund distribution.
Section 2(f) on priority criteria doesn't clearly quantify terms like 'greatest need,' making it difficult to objectively determine priority, leading to potential bias or inconsistent application of funds.
The broad language used in Section 172(c)(1) "From amounts made available for this section, the Secretary shall award grants" does not specify a cap or specific allocation of funds, leading to potential overspending or misallocation.
The text of Section 3 does not specify how the effectiveness of the grant program will be evaluated or detail the criteria used, leading to potential challenges in assessing its success objectively.
Section 2(g) lacks clear metrics or benchmarks for evaluating the success of funded programs beyond general reporting requirements, which could lead to subjective evaluations and limited accountability.
The definition of 'mentoring' in Section 2(b)(8) is broad, leading to potential inconsistencies in program implementation.
The bill text includes numerous references to other acts and sections without complete context in Section 2, which may make it difficult to understand without additional cross-referencing.
Section 2(d)(1) detailing 'Authorized activities' is highly detailed and may be cumbersome for applicants to address thoroughly, leading to complexity in compliance and reporting.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section, titled "Short title," allows the Act to be referred to as the "Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025."
2. Youth mentoring programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section outlines the establishment and support of youth mentoring programs to help young people develop skills and prepare for future success in education and the workforce. It allows grants for community organizations and partnerships to create these programs, especially targeting underserved areas, and includes detailed requirements for mentor training, activities, and reporting on program effectiveness.
172. Youth mentoring programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text is about a program aimed at supporting mentoring initiatives for certain young people. It explains the purpose of these programs, the types of organizations and partnerships eligible to participate, and the activities the grants can fund. The goal is to help these youth develop important skills for school and work, involving mentors who can guide them through setting and achieving goals. The text also includes details about grant application requirements, priorities for funding, reporting duties, and resources available for the development and implementation of mentoring programs.
3. Study on mentoring programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Secretary of Labor, through the Chief Evaluation Officer, to conduct a study to find effective mentoring programs, assess how mentors can help with students' learning and job readiness, and evaluate a related grant program's impact on student success and career development. The study results must be reported to congressional committees within three years of the bill's enactment.