Overview
Title
To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to increase Tribal access to water conservation and efficiency grants, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 2927 is a bill that wants to help Native American tribes save and use water more wisely by making it easier for them to get special money from the government. It allows tribes to pay less or nothing at all for water projects if they don't have enough money, but there are some concerns that this might be done unfairly or put too much cost on the government.
Summary AI
S. 2927 seeks to amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 in order to enhance Tribal access to water conservation and efficiency grants. The proposed legislation allows the Secretary to reduce or waive the requirement for Indian tribes to pay the non-Federal share of costs for water management projects if paying those costs would cause financial hardship for the tribe. The bill has been filed in the Senate and was reported without amendment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, identified as S. 2927, seeks to amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. Its main objective is to enhance the ability of Tribal governments to access water conservation and efficiency grants. The bill empowers the Secretary to reduce or waive the non-Federal share of costs for certain water management projects specifically involving Indian tribes. This waiver can be granted if contributing the non-Federal share would result in financial hardship for the tribe.
General Summary
The "WaterSMART Access for Tribes Act" aims to support Indian tribes in undertaking water management improvements by potentially alleviating some of their financial burdens. This legislation acknowledges the unique challenges that tribes might face in securing necessary funding for infrastructure projects that promote water conservation and efficiency. By enabling the waiver or reduction of the non-Federal cost share, the act intends to facilitate easier access to these critical projects.
Significant Issues
A few key issues arise with the bill's provisions. Notably, the broad authority granted to the Secretary to waive or reduce the financial contribution required from tribes is not accompanied by detailed guidelines or limitations. This could lead to potential inconsistencies in how waivers are applied across different tribes and circumstances. Furthermore, the criteria for what constitutes "financial hardship" remain undefined within the bill, further contributing to potential variability and subjectivity in decision-making. There is also concern that such waivers could significantly increase the financial burden on the Federal government if applied frequently, without stringent criteria.
Additionally, the language of the bill, particularly in Section 2, may be challenging for individuals without a legal background to comprehend. References to various clauses and subclauses can add complexity to the bill's interpretation and understanding.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill is likely to be welcomed by Indian tribes who might benefit from reduced financial constraints when undertaking vital water management projects. Such initiatives can improve water conservation efforts and contribute to long-term environmental sustainability. If implemented thoughtfully, the legislation can promote equitable access to water management resources for tribes, enabling them to address water-related challenges more effectively.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For Indian tribes, this bill has the potential to be highly beneficial, allowing them to proceed with necessary infrastructure improvements without the financial impediments posed by non-Federal cost shares. This impact is particularly positive for tribes that may struggle to generate the necessary funds due to economic limitations.
On the other hand, there is a potential downside for the Federal government, which may face increased financial liability if waivers are routinely granted without judicious criteria. Policymakers and government agencies involved in administering these waivers will need to carefully consider each tribe's financial context to ensure the policy is applied fairly and sustainably.
In conclusion, while the bill presents an opportunity to support Indian tribes in accessing crucial water management grants, careful attention to the application guidelines and criteria is necessary to avoid potential pitfalls associated with broad discretionary powers and undefined terms.
Issues
The broad authority granted to the Secretary to waive or reduce the non-Federal share of costs for Indian tribes without specific guidelines or limitations could result in potential misuse or favoritism (Section 2).
The criteria for determining 'financial hardship' for Indian tribes is not explicitly defined, which might lead to inconsistent application of the waiver or reduction of the non-Federal share of costs (Section 2).
The financial burden on the Federal government could increase due to potential frequent reductions or waivers of the non-Federal share of costs, given the broad waiver authority granted to the Secretary (Section 2).
The language in Section 2 is somewhat complex, with references to other clauses and subclauses, which might make it difficult for stakeholders without a legal background to understand the provisions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The short title of this law is the "WaterSMART Access for Tribes Act," meaning that this is the name by which the law will be commonly referred to.
2. Reduction or waiver of non-Federal share of costs of certain water management improvements for Indian tribes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies a law to allow the Secretary, when working with Indian tribes on certain water management projects, to either reduce or completely waive the required contribution from the tribe if paying that share would cause financial hardship.