Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to upgrade existing emergency communications centers in units of the National Park System to Next Generation 9–1–1 systems, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that when people call for help in national parks, the calls are handled using better and faster technology just like on your phone, so everyone can get help more quickly if they need it.
Summary AI
S. 290 seeks to direct the Secretary of the Interior to upgrade the emergency communication centers within the National Park System to Next Generation 9-1-1 systems. It requires an assessment of existing centers to determine the implementation status, costs for upgrades, and operational needs. Following the assessment, a plan must be developed to install the new systems, with consultation from state, local, and federal stakeholders to ensure system interoperability. The plan excludes any centers where sufficient Next Generation 9-1-1 systems are already in place.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Making National Parks Safer Act," aims to enhance emergency response systems in the National Park System. The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to upgrade current emergency communications centers to state-of-the-art Next Generation 9-1-1 systems. This transition is designed to improve emergency services by enabling more sophisticated data and information sharing. Introduced in the Senate, it directly addresses the need for improved public safety measures in national parks, affecting both park visitors and personnel.
Summary of Significant Issues
Lack of Budget and Cost Provisions
One of the primary concerns is the absence of clear budgetary outlines or cost implications. The bill mandates the creation of a plan for these upgrades but does not specify a budget, potentially leading to unchecked or wasteful spending. This omission could cause taxpayers and financial oversight bodies to worry about fiscal responsibility.
Ambiguities and Implementation Challenges
The bill lacks explicit criteria and timelines for assessing and implementing these advanced 9-1-1 systems. Without such specifications, there could be significant delays and inconsistencies in implementing the upgrades. Additionally, terms such as "sufficient Next Generation 9-1-1 systems" are not clearly defined, leaving room for subjective interpretation by park superintendents.
Oversight and Accountability Concerns
The bill does not specify the mechanisms needed for oversight or accountability, which might lead to issues such as resource mismanagement or favoritism. The ambiguity about which congressional committees will receive updates further complicates transparency and effective dissemination of important information.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, particularly visitors to national parks, the bill represents a step towards improved safety and emergency response capabilities. Upgrading to Next Generation 9-1-1 systems means that park visitors could expect faster and more efficient processing of emergency calls and data sharing, possibly saving lives in critical situations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
National Park Personnel: Park rangers and emergency responders stand to benefit from improved communication systems that allow for better coordination during rescue operations. It can lead to enhanced safety for park employees who often work in isolated conditions.
State and Local Agencies: The requirement to consult with state and local officials for plan development might create beneficial collaboration opportunities. However, it also introduces potential biases where stakeholders with more influence might skew decisions.
Technology Providers: Companies offering Next Generation 9-1-1 technology could see a surge in business due to increased demand for equipment and installation services. This bill might drive innovation and competitiveness within the tech industries related to public safety and emergency communications.
Conclusion
Overall, the "Making National Parks Safer Act" endeavors to significantly improve public safety measures in national parks across the United States. However, its current form raises several concerns, particularly in budget transparency, specific implementation strategies, and the need for robust oversight measures. Addressing these issues could enhance the bill's effectiveness in meeting its objectives of protecting park visitors and personnel through advanced emergency communication systems.
Issues
The bill in Section 4 mandates the development of a plan for installing Next Generation 9-1-1 systems but does not specify the cost implications or provide a budget, which could lead to potentially unchecked or wasteful spending. This may be concerning to taxpayers and budget oversight bodies.
Section 3 lacks clear criteria and timelines for the assessment and implementation of the Next Generation 9-1-1 systems, which could lead to delays and inefficiencies in upgrading the emergency communications systems in National Park units.
The bill in Section 4 does not define what constitutes 'sufficient Next Generation 9-1-1 systems,' leaving room for subjective interpretation by superintendents of different National Park System units, potentially leading to inconsistency in implementation.
The absence of an oversight mechanism or accountability measures in Sections 2 to 4 could result in mismanagement or favoritism in the allocation of resources, especially given the reliance on complex definitions and external standards that may change over time.
In Section 3, the term 'appropriate committees of Congress' is vague, not specifying which committees will receive the report, potentially leading to oversight issues and lack of accountability in the dissemination of information about the implementation of the Next Generation 9-1-1 systems.
Section 4's requirement to consult with state and local stakeholders and agencies might favor certain entities with more influence or better connections, potentially leading to biased decision-making in the planning and deployment of the systems.
Section 2 introduces complex, technical definitions such as 'interoperability' and 'Next Generation 9-1-1 system' that depend on external regulations, which could complicate implementation and lead to cost overruns or technological dependency on specific providers.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the official name of this Act is the “Making National Parks Safer Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, various terms are defined including "appropriate committees of Congress" which refers to specific committees in the Senate and House of Representatives, and "emergency communications center", which includes facilities for handling 9–1–1 emergency calls. It also defines "interoperability" as the capability to process and share emergency information without barriers, "Next Generation 9–1–1 system" from federal regulations, and "Secretary" as the Secretary of the Interior.
3. Assessment of emergency communications centers located in units of the National Park System Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary to complete an assessment within one year of the emergency communications centers in the National Park System to evaluate the status and costs associated with implementing and maintaining Next Generation 9–1–1 systems. After the assessment, a report must be submitted to Congress and posted online, highlighting the findings and identifying potential challenges related to jurisdiction, technology, authority, and legal agreements.
4. Plan to install Next Generation 9–1–1 systems in units of the National Park System Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Secretary create a plan within one year to install upgraded 9-1-1 systems in emergency centers within National Parks, in consultation with state, local, and federal agencies. However, it excludes parks where adequate systems are already in place or being installed.