Overview
Title
To make daylight saving time permanent, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 29 is a bill that wants to make everyone in the U.S. keep their clocks set like it's summer all year, instead of changing them for winter. It also lets some states decide if they want to follow this rule or stick to their old time.
Summary AI
S. 29 aims to make daylight saving time permanent throughout the United States by repealing the temporary period for daylight saving time established in the Uniform Time Act of 1966. It amends previous legislation to adjust the advancement of standard time by one hour in various time zones. The bill also allows certain states and areas that have previously opted out of daylight saving time to choose whether to maintain their current standard time or adopt the new permanent daylight saving time.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "Sunshine Protection Act of 2025," aims to make daylight saving time permanent across the United States. The bill introduces amendments to existing time-related laws, specifically the Uniform Time Act of 1966 and the Calder Act of 1918, effectively shifting time zones forward by one hour. Additionally, it allows for certain state exemptions, enabling regions that have previously opted out of daylight saving time to either adopt the new standard time or stick with their existing time arrangement.
General Summary of the Bill
This bill is designed to eliminate the twice-yearly clock changes associated with daylight saving time, intending to keep the nation on daylight saving time year-round. It modifies historical legislation governing time zones, with provisions for states to make independent decisions about their standard time if they have previously opted-out of daylight saving transitions.
Summary of Significant Issues
One key issue with the bill is the absence of a detailed fiscal impact analysis. Changes of this nature often have wide-ranging economic implications, yet the bill does not provide insight into potential costs or savings. Additionally, the legislative language in amending previous laws is both repetitive and complex, potentially reducing accessibility and clarity for those trying to comprehend the changes.
The provision for state exemptions introduces another layer of complexity. Without clear guidelines, different states or even areas within states might adopt different standards, leading to potential inconsistency and confusion. Furthermore, changes in sub-sections, which aren't clearly explained, might confuse readers unfamiliar with the original legislative structure.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
From a public perspective, making daylight saving time permanent might lead to a more straightforward, standard approach to timekeeping, eliminating the confusion of clock changes. It could benefit sectors that rely heavily on daylight, such as retail and outdoor recreation, by effectively extending daylight hours in the evening throughout the year. This proposition might aid in energy conservation efforts and potentially provide a boost to the economy through increased consumer spending and productivity.
Conversely, the impacts on specific stakeholders such as those in agriculture, who traditionally prefer early morning daylight, might be less favorable. There may also be challenges for businesses and individuals in regions that choose to follow a different time standard, potentially complicating scheduling and operations across state lines.
In summary, while the Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 aims to streamline timekeeping practices, its success hinges on the clarity of its implementation measures and the effective communication of its fiscal and practical implications. As such, if passed, additional amendments or clarifications may be needed to address the highlighted issues and ensure its effective adoption nationwide.
Issues
The lack of a specified fiscal impact or savings in Section 2 regarding making daylight saving time permanent may raise concerns related to government budget considerations, as changes like these might have financial implications that are not being addressed.
The language in the amendment process of Section 2(a) of the Act of March 19, 1918, is repetitive and complex, potentially reducing clarity and readability, which could be problematic for those trying to understand the legislative changes.
The provisions for state exemptions in Section 2(b) introduce ambiguity as states or areas can choose their standard time based on preference without clear guidelines. This could lead to inconsistent application across the country, which may cause confusion for both individuals and businesses.
The amendment to redesignate subsection (b) as subsection (c) in Section 2(b) could confuse readers unfamiliar with the original structure of the legislation, highlighting a need for clarity when referencing adjustments to existing legislative frameworks.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act specifies its short title, stating that it can be referred to as the “Sunshine Protection Act of 2025.”
2. Making daylight saving time permanent Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text proposes making daylight saving time permanent and includes several changes to existing time-related laws. It would amend the Uniform Time Act of 1966 and the Calder Act, adjusting time zones by one hour, and allows states or areas that opt-out of daylight saving time to choose either the new standard time or retain their current standard time.