The proposed legislation, known as S. 2784, seeks to amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992. The main objective of this bill is to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park to include an additional acre of land in Dayton, Ohio. This adjustment is intended to be incorporated as depicted on a specific map associated with the bill.

General Summary of the Bill

S. 2784 aims to expand the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park by adding approximately one acre of land to its boundaries. The expansion is documented on a map referred to in the legislation and dated both February 2023 and June 2024. This adjustment is expected to incorporate more of Dayton's historical context related to aviation heritage within the protected park area.

Summary of Significant Issues

One prominent issue with the bill lies in the inconsistency regarding the dates of the map used for the boundary adjustment. The map is cited with two dates: February 2023 and June 2024. This could lead to confusion or litigation regarding the official and final version of the map to be used, complicating the bill's implementation.

Another concern is the absence of clear information about the costs or funding sources required for the boundary expansion. Without this information, there could be apprehension about hidden or potentially undefined financial implications that might impact public resources or necessitate additional Congressional appropriations.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill represents an effort to preserve and potentially enhance an important piece of American aviation history. Incorporating more land into the historical park might increase educational opportunities, tourism, and community activities centered around aviation heritage. However, if the funding issues are not clarified, there could be concerns over public spending or resource allocation that might affect taxpayer interests or other federal programs.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Local communities in Dayton, including historians, educators, and tourism operators, might experience positive impacts. The additional land could serve as a new destination for visitors, potentially boosting local economy through increased tourism-related activities.

Conversely, if implementation leads to unexpected costs without clear funding strategies, residents could face negative consequences such as reallocated funding from community projects or additional burdens on local government resources required to support the expansion.

In summary, while S. 2784 holds the potential to enrich the preservation and interpretation of Dayton's aviation legacy, the bill's lack of clarity on some key points may pose challenges that need addressing to ensure effective and efficient enactment.