Overview

Title

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 231 North Franklin Street in Greensburg, Indiana, as the Brigadier General John T. Wilder Post Office.

ELI5 AI

The people in charge want to give a special name to the post office in Greensburg, Indiana, so it will be called the "Brigadier General John T. Wilder Post Office" to honor someone important.

Summary AI

S. 2717 proposes naming the United States Postal Service facility at 231 North Franklin Street in Greensburg, Indiana, as the "Brigadier General John T. Wilder Post Office." The bill was introduced by Mr. Braun and Mr. Young and has been reported without amendment. Upon enactment, all official references to this facility will use the new designated name.

Published

2024-02-06
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-02-06
Package ID: BILLS-118s2717rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
329
Pages:
4
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 141
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 1
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 17
Entities: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.24
Average Sentence Length:
25.31
Token Entropy:
4.40
Readability (ARI):
14.53

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill, S. 2717, is a straightforward legislative act aimed at renaming a United States Postal Service facility. The facility in question, located at 231 North Franklin Street in Greensburg, Indiana, is to be designated as the "Brigadier General John T. Wilder Post Office." This change means any official documents or references to this facility will adopt the new name.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents several significant issues:

  1. Financial Implications: There is no mention of the costs associated with renaming, such as expenses for updating signage, stationery, or maps. Understanding these costs is important for maintaining fiscal responsibility.

  2. Naming Justification: The bill does not clarify the reasoning behind choosing Brigadier General John T. Wilder for this honor. This lack of explanation could lead to questions about the fairness or transparency of the naming process.

  3. Consultation and Approval Lack: The legislation does not indicate if any consultations or approvals were sought from local authorities or stakeholders. This absence might raise concerns about the inclusivity and transparency of governmental decision-making processes.

  4. Administrative Considerations: There is no evaluation of the potential administrative challenges that might arise from changing the facility's name in records and databases. Such oversight might affect the efficiency and operational clarity of services.

Impact on the Public

On a broad level, this bill might have a limited direct impact on the public. Renaming a post office generally does not create significant operational changes for patrons using the facility. However, it does reflect how government bodies memorialize historical figures and events, which can influence public memory and local heritage.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  1. USPS and Government Administration: There could be a mild administrative burden on USPS and related governmental agencies due to the need to update various records and signage. While this is typically manageable, it requires resource allocation which could have been better outlined in the bill.

  2. Residents and Community: For Greensburg residents, the renaming might hold cultural or emotional significance, especially if Brigadier General John T. Wilder has historical ties or contributions to the area. However, without clarification on Wilder’s connection to the location, stakeholders may feel excluded from a decision that changes an aspect of their community landmark.

  3. Families and Veterans’ Groups: The naming could be positively received by families or groups related to veterans or military history, as it honors a specific military figure. Knowledge about why Wilder merits this recognition could bolster the positive reception and engagement from these stakeholders.

In conclusion, while S. 2717 serves to honor an individual by renaming a post office, the absence of certain critical details could affect its implementation and reception. Addressing these areas might foster greater community engagement and ensure transparent and efficient public administration.

Issues

  • There is no indication of the cost associated with renaming the postal facility, which could potentially involve expenses for updating signage, stationary, and maps. This financial aspect is crucial for transparency and responsible fiscal management. [Section 1]

  • No explanation is provided for why the postal facility is being named after Brigadier General John T. Wilder, raising potential questions of favoritism or concerns about the selection process for naming public facilities. This could be significant to the public in terms of ethical considerations and historical relevance. [Section 1]

  • The lack of information on whether consultations or approvals were sought from local authorities or stakeholders regarding the renaming might lead to concerns about public involvement and transparency in government decisions. [Section 1]

  • There is no assessment of potential confusion or administrative burden caused by the change in reference to the post office in various records and databases, which could impact efficiency and operational clarity. [Section 1]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Brigadier General John T. Wilder Post Office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section designates the United States Postal Service facility at 231 North Franklin Street in Greensburg, Indiana, as the “Brigadier General John T. Wilder Post Office.” It also states that any mention of this facility in official records will use this new name.