Overview

Title

To prohibit unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 2498 is a rule that says hotels must show the real price of a room, so people know exactly how much they have to pay without any surprises, and the government will help make sure they do.

Summary AI

S. 2498 is a bill titled the "Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2024" that aims to stop unfair and misleading advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other short-term lodgings. It requires that all advertised prices for these services include mandatory fees, excluding taxes, to give consumers a clear understanding of the total cost upfront. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would enforce these rules, and states can also take action if their residents are affected. The act sets a legal framework for what hotels and other lodging services must disclose before consumers make a purchase, promoting transparency and protecting consumers from hidden fees.

Published

2024-08-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-08-01
Package ID: BILLS-118s2498rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
4,113
Pages:
22
Sentences:
96

Language

Nouns: 1,142
Verbs: 340
Adjectives: 258
Adverbs: 20
Numbers: 94
Entities: 133

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.14
Average Sentence Length:
42.84
Token Entropy:
5.20
Readability (ARI):
22.91

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2024," aims to improve transparency in the pricing of hotel rooms and short-term lodging. By mandating that all required fees, excluding government taxes, be included in the advertised prices of these accommodations, the bill seeks to address concerns of misleading pricing practices within the hospitality industry. Violations of the bill's stipulations would be treated as deceptive practices under the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The bill also outlines mechanisms for enforcement at both federal and state levels, set to take effect 450 days post-enactment.

Significant Issues

While the intention of the bill is to protect consumers from deceptive advertising, several issues have been identified that may affect its implementation and effectiveness. One major concern is the lack of a clear definition for "required fees." This ambiguity could lead to inconsistent enforcement and interpretation across different jurisdictions, which might undermine the bill's goal of standardizing transparent pricing.

Additionally, the bill potentially favors larger lodging companies and booking platforms. These entities likely have more resources to quickly adapt to and comply with new regulations, while smaller businesses may struggle to meet the same standards due to limited resources. This could result in an uneven playing field, putting smaller companies at a competitive disadvantage.

Furthermore, the reliance on definitions from the complex Federal Trade Commission Act could make it challenging for some parties, particularly smaller businesses and the general public, to fully understand their roles and responsibilities under this bill. There is also some ambiguity surrounding the "good faith" determination related to third-party sellers, which could lead to uneven application and enforcement of the law.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill aims to foster consumer trust by ensuring that advertised prices accurately reflect all mandatory fees. This could aid consumers in making more informed decisions, potentially reducing surprise costs during the booking process. However, the delayed implementation timeline of 450 days before the bill takes full effect could postpone these consumer benefits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The hospitality industry may experience varied impacts. While larger corporations are likely to adjust their pricing strategies swiftly and remain compliant, small businesses could face challenges. The intricate details and potential costs associated with compliance might burden smaller operators, possibly leading to higher prices or reduced service offerings as they attempt to cover these operational costs.

State governments might also encounter friction due to the bill's preemption clause, which could limit their ability to maintain independent regulatory standards. This aspect might spark legal debates over state versus federal jurisdiction, potentially leading to adjustments or additional legislation to resolve these matters.

In conclusion, while the "Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2024" aims to enhance consumer protection through transparent pricing in the lodging industry, its successful implementation depends on clarifying certain ambiguous elements and balancing the needs and capabilities of different industry stakeholders.

Issues

  • Section 2 lacks a clear definition of 'required fees,' which could create confusion or inconsistencies in the enforcement and compliance of this bill across different jurisdictions.

  • The bill potentially favors larger lodging companies or booking platforms that may have more resources to comply with detailed regulations, potentially putting smaller businesses at a disadvantage.

  • The 'covered person' term in Section 2 relies on the Federal Trade Commission Act's complex definition, which could make it difficult for the general public and smaller businesses to fully understand their responsibilities and rights.

  • There is ambiguity in the bill regarding who determines if an intermediary or third-party seller's reliance on information was 'in good faith,' potentially leading to inconsistent applications or interpretations.

  • The preemption clause in Section 2(c) is seen as overly broad, potentially conflicting with state rights, which could lead to significant legal challenges from states seeking to maintain their regulatory standards.

  • The lack of specificity regarding penalties or actions of the Federal Trade Commission against violating entities in Section 2 weakens enforcement and may hinder effective regulation.

  • Overall coordination between the Commission and States as required in Section 2(b) could lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and hinder timely enforcement actions against violators.

  • The timeframe of 450 days before the prohibition takes effect might cause delays in consumer protection, especially considering the fast-paced changes in online marketing and sales techniques for short-term lodging.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that it's officially called the “Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2023”.

2. Prohibition on unfair and deceptive advertising of hotel rooms and other short-term lodging prices Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits any business from advertising lodging prices without showing all required fees (except taxes and government fees), and it ensures that violations are treated as deceptive practices under the Federal Trade Commission. Both the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general can enforce these rules, with the prohibition taking effect 450 days after the law's enactment, but only applying to bookings made after that date.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the official name of the act is the "Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2024".

2. Prohibition on unfair and deceptive advertising of hotel rooms and other short-term rental prices Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits companies from hiding fees or taxes when advertising the prices of hotel rooms or short-term rentals. It requires that the total price, including any mandatory fees, be clearly shown at all stages of the booking process, and it outlines how the rules will be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission and state governments.