Overview
Title
To amend the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010 to make improvements to that Act, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is trying to make some changes to a plan from 2010 about how the Crow Tribe uses and manages water. It wants to make sure the water projects are done right and with the right support, but some changes might make things confusing or unclear.
Summary AI
The bill S. 240 aims to enhance the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010. It introduces amendments to definitions, repeals some sections concerning the MR&I System, and replaces them with MR&I Projects. The bill also establishes funds and accounts such as the Crow Settlement Fund and Crow CIP Implementation Account to manage and distribute funding for water infrastructure projects, ensuring they're prioritized according to tribal needs and environmental laws. It also amends various sections to update references and extend timelines for certain projects.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025," aims to amend the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010. By modifying certain provisions, the act intends to improve the original legislation's effectiveness in managing water rights resources for the Crow Tribe. Key updates include revising definitions, replacing certain project terms, introducing new accounts for project funding, and clarifying the responsibilities regarding water infrastructure. The bill emphasizes the management and distribution of project funds and ensures that the Crow Tribe maintains control over any infrastructure developed.
Significant Issues
One critical issue with the bill is the repeal of Section 406, which concerns the MR&I System. This repeal may affect ongoing projects or funding linked to this system, which should be carefully reviewed to prevent unintended consequences. Additionally, changes introduced in terminology, from "System" to "Projects," may cause confusion without specific descriptions, potentially complicating project management. The reorganization and renumbering of sections in the bill might lead to referencing errors, making it hard to interpret or implement the amendments correctly.
The lack of clear oversight or accountability measures, especially concerning the Crow CIP Implementation Account, is another concern. Without proper oversight, there might be a risk of fund mismanagement or misuse. Provisions exempting the Federal Government from responsibility for infrastructure maintenance without clear follow-up mechanisms could result in neglect or fiscal mismanagement. The bill also accommodates financial fluctuations based on a 2008 cost basis, which may not accurately reflect modern economics.
Public Impact
Broadly, the bill seeks to enhance water rights management for the Crow Tribe, which might improve infrastructure quality and resource reliability. However, the potential confusion due to ambiguous terminology and non-specific provisions could hinder effective project execution and maintenance. The public might benefit from improved water systems if the bill facilitates efficient resource management.
Impact on Stakeholders
For the Crow Tribe, the bill promises greater control over infrastructure, potentially leading to tailored solutions that suit tribal needs. However, the lack of oversight and the possibility of misinterpreting funding provisions could create challenges in project execution and financial accountability.
The Federal Government's reduced responsibility for infrastructure maintenance might ease fiscal pressures, but it also requires ensuring that the Crow Tribe has adequate mechanisms for ongoing maintenance, avoiding long-term infrastructure deterioration.
Other stakeholders, such as contractors and construction firms involved with MR&I Projects, might experience challenges due to possible confusion in project scopes and funding allocations.
In conclusion, while the bill could foster better management of water rights for the Crow Tribe, attention, and revisions are necessary to address its significant issues to ensure clear, effective implementation and oversight.
Issues
The repeal of Section 406 in the Crow Tribe water rights settlement could have significant financial and operational impacts, as it involves the MR&I System, which may be tied to ongoing work or funding (Section 2(b)).
Changes in terminology from 'System' to 'Projects' without clear, consistent definitions could lead to confusion in the management and execution of infrastructure projects. This impacts sections like 2(a) and Section 2(c)(3)(A).
The shifting of section numbers throughout the document may cause misreference errors, complicating the interpretation and implementation of the settlement (Sections 2(c)(2), 2(d), and 2(g)).
The lack of specified oversight or accountability measures for managing the Crow CIP Implementation Account raises transparency and misuse concerns. This mainly affects Section 412.
Provisions preventing the Federal Government from paying for the operation, maintenance, or replacement of MR&I Projects without specifying oversight mechanisms could result in fiscal irresponsibility or neglect of infrastructure (Section 2(j)).
The broad and potentially vague terms regarding the use of funds from the MR&I Projects Account for on-Reservation projects and land purchases may lead to broad interpretation and potential misuse (Section 2(c)(4)(F)).
The indexing of MR&I Project costs to a 2008 cost basis may not accurately reflect contemporary cost trends, which could result in inappropriate funding levels (Section 2(f)(3)(j)(1)).
References to other sections not fully detailed in the text, such as in Section 412 regarding funding and deposits, can cause a lack of clarity for allocating and using funds.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section titled "1. Short title" states that this law can be referred to as the “Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025.”
2. Crow Tribe water rights settlement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010 update definitions, eliminate the MR&I System, and manage funds with the Secretary overseeing investments and distributions. New accounts, like the Crow CIP Implementation Account, are established to support specific water-related projects, ensuring the Tribe retains control over infrastructure and the Federal Government isn't responsible for maintenance costs. Additionally, changes account for cost fluctuations, and several technical and clerical amendments are made throughout the document for consistency.
412. Crow CIP Implementation Account Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Crow CIP Implementation Account is a special interest-bearing account established by the Secretary to help manage and distribute funds made available by certain provisions of the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025. The funds, along with any investment earnings, will be used specifically to carry out section 405 of the act.