Overview
Title
To address the threat from the development of Iran’s ballistic missile program and the transfer or deployment of Iranian missiles and related goods and technology, including materials and equipment, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill aims to stop Iran from making or sharing dangerous missiles by checking who's involved and punishing them. It also wants people to keep talking to find safe solutions even when some rules end.
Summary AI
S. 2336, also known as the "Making Iran Sanctions Stick In Lieu of Expiration of Sanctions Act" or the "MISSILES Act," is designed to address the threat posed by Iran's ballistic missile program and its transfer or deployment of missiles and related technology. The bill outlines U.S. policy to combat arms transfers involving Iran, holds responsible parties accountable under U.S. and international law, and seeks to extend international restrictions set to expire in October 2023. It mandates reports on diplomatic strategies, impacts of sanctions, and actions to combat missile proliferation and imposes sanctions on individuals and entities involved in these activities. The bill also requires a report assessing the impact of U.S. sanctions on Iran, including their effect on various aspects of Iranian society and economy.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Making Iran Sanctions Stick In Lieu of Expiration of Sanctions Act" or the "MISSILES Act", aims to address concerns arising from Iran’s ballistic missile program. More specifically, the bill targets the transfer and deployment of Iranian missiles and related technology by implementing sanctions and export controls. This legislation pertains to the anticipated expiration of certain restrictions under the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, scheduled for October 2023. It mandates comprehensive reporting by the U.S. Secretary of State on the diplomatic strategies concerning Iran's missile activities, requiring regular assessments and documentation of impacts arising from the implementation of these sanctions.
Significant Issues
Several issues merit attention within the framework of this bill:
Ambiguity Post-Expiration of Restrictions: The bill highlights the expiration of certain missile-related restrictions under a U.N. resolution in October 2023 but leaves a notable gap in addressing the potential ramifications of these expirations or offering specific solutions to mitigate any negative outcomes.
Broad Language and Lack of Specificity: The bill employs broad language, particularly concerning the enforcement of policies and the use of "all available authorities" to limit Iran's missile production. This ambiguity could lead to legal challenges or unintended actions.
Presidential Discretion: Provisions granting the President significant discretion to bypass or terminate sanctions without additional checks and balances could result in inconsistent enforcement or undermine the bill's objectives.
Complexity and Accessibility: The technical nature of the bill's language might hinder comprehension by the general public, potentially affecting transparency and communication about its provisions.
Resource and Reporting Challenges: The bill requires extensive reporting from the Secretary of State, which could strain resources without allocated funding, especially given the broad scope and frequency of these reports.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The implications of this bill for the general public and specific stakeholders are multifaceted. Broadly, the public may experience indirect effects related to international relations and global security dynamics as the U.S. intensifies its stance on Iran's missile capabilities. The bill’s potential strengthening of sanctions could impact global oil markets and geopolitical stability, influencing everyday economic factors such as gas prices.
For stakeholders directly involved, such as defense contractors, foreign policy experts, and international relations analysts, the bill presents an increased focus on compliance with the layered sanctions. Should the bill pass, government agencies and relevant industries would need to allocate substantial resources to ensure adherence to its provisions. Additionally, countries with strong ties to Iran might feel the effects of these sanctions through diplomatic and economic channels.
Furthermore, entities inadvertently linked to Iran's missile activities might suffer unintended consequences, facing sanctions or restrictions even with minimal involvement. Conversely, the bill might reassure other nations concerned with Iran's ballistic missile development by reinforcing U.S. commitment to countering potential threats. Thus, maintaining a nuanced and strategic approach in interpreting and applying the bill is critical for all involved parties to navigate its plethora of mandates and outcomes.
Issues
The anticipated expiration of missile-related restrictions in October 2023 under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 is highlighted in Sections 2, 3, and 5. The bill does not adequately address the potential consequences or propose specific solutions, leaving uncertainty about future policy actions post-expiration.
The bill, particularly in Sections 3 and 6, uses broad and vague language regarding policy enforcement, such as 'all available authorities' and 'contraint Iran’s domestic ballistic missile production capabilities.' This vagueness could lead to legal challenges or unintended consequences.
Section 6 grants significant discretion to the President in bypassing sanctions through waivers and terminating sanctions without clear guidelines or additional checks and balances, which may lead to inconsistent application or undermine the bill's intended effects.
The language and terminology used throughout the bill, as seen in Sections 5 and 6, are highly technical and may be challenging for the general public to understand, raising concerns about transparency and accessibility of the bill's provisions.
The bill in Section 5 involves extensive reporting requirements without clear budget or resource allocations, which might result in inefficiencies or overburden existing resources.
Section 8's reporting timeframe of 90 days for assessing the impact of U.S. sanctions on Iran may be insufficient for a comprehensive analysis, especially with broad scope requirements, leading to potential inaccuracies or rushed assessments.
Section 6 provides exceptions for intelligence activities and importation of goods, which might be exploited, weakening the bill's effectiveness in preventing proliferation of Iranian missiles.
The definition of 'covered technology' in Section 4 relies on external documents (the Missile Technology Control Regime Annex) that may change, potentially causing uncertainty in enforcement.
The use of the term 'knowingly' defined by referencing another act (Iran Sanctions Act of 1996) in Section 4 might create challenges for interpretation and enforcement without clear context.
Section 7's requirement for frequent reports every 180 days may be resource-intensive without clear justification, potentially straining available resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short titles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides short titles for the act, allowing it to be referred to as the “Making Iran Sanctions Stick In Lieu of Expiration of Sanctions Act” or the “MISSILES Act”.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 limits certain missile-related activities with Iran and that Iran has violated these restrictions by transferring drones to other countries without approval. Additionally, certain restrictions will expire in October 2023, potentially allowing more freedom for such activities and transfers.
3. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the U.S. policy to stop the transfer of weapons and technology to or from Iran and to hold accountable those who violate these rules through sanctions and export controls. It also emphasizes extending missile-related restrictions and limiting Iran's ability to produce ballistic missiles.
4. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for specific terms used in the Act, including what is meant by "appropriate congressional committees," "covered technology," "foreign person," and "Missile Technology Control Regime," among others. These terms are crucial for understanding the scope and application of the Act.
5. Department of State report on diplomatic strategy and other aspects of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 expirations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary of State to give Congress a report every year for four years about the plans and effects related to ending missile restrictions around Iran. This report should include information on diplomatic strategies, potential impacts on Iran's activities, revenue from the lapse of restrictions, and actions by countries like China and Russia, as well as details on foreign involvement and supply chains in Iran’s military programs.
6. Combating the proliferation of Iranian missiles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines measures to prevent the spread of Iranian missile technology by enforcing sanctions on foreign individuals aiding Iran's missile efforts. These sanctions include blocking property, visa bans, penalties for violations, with certain exceptions and provisions for sanction waiver and termination tied to Iran ceasing support for terrorism and dismantling its weapons programs.
1. Short titles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section provides the short titles for the law, which can be referred to as the “Making Iran Sanctions Stick In Lieu of Expiration of Sanctions Act” or the “MISSILES Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that Iran has violated United Nations regulations by transferring drones to various nations without approval, which could lead to the expiration of some missile-related restrictions in October 2023, thus lifting international legal constraints on missile-related actions involving Iran.
3. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The United States' policy aims to stop the transfer of weapons and technology to and from Iran, make sure those violating arms restrictions are held accountable under U.S. and international law, push for continued restrictions on missile activities, and use all means to limit Iran’s ability to produce ballistic missiles.
4. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section provides the definitions for terms used in the Act. It defines important terms like "appropriate congressional committees," which refers to specific committees in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives; "covered technology," which includes goods and materials listed in the Missile Technology Control Regime Annex; and "foreign person," which refers to individuals or entities not considered U.S. persons. It also clarifies the meanings of terms such as "good," "Government of Iran," "Iran-aligned entity," "knowingly," "Missile Technology Control Regime," "Missile Technology Control Regime Annex," and "United States person."
5. Department of State report on diplomatic strategy and other aspects of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 expirations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of State to provide an annual report to congressional committees for the next four years. This report should outline strategies and analyses about renewing international restrictions on missile-related activities involving Iran and address issues like the potential impact of these expirations, the involvement of other countries, and violations of related United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 rules.
6. Combating the proliferation of Iranian missiles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section outlines actions against foreign individuals involved in Iranian missile activities, imposing sanctions like blocking property and denying U.S. entry. It allows for exceptions and a waiver in national security interests and will end if Iran stops supporting terrorism and dismantles its missile programs.
7. Report to identify, and designation as foreign terrorist organizations of, Iranian persons that have attacked United States citizens using unmanned combat aerial vehicles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of State to submit regular reports identifying Iranian individuals who have attacked U.S. citizens using drones, and mandates the President to designate those individuals as foreign terrorist organizations. The Secretary of State can waive this requirement if it's in the national security interest, and the requirement will end four years after the law's enactment.
8. Report on impacts on the Islamic Republic of Iran of sanctions imposed by the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines that the Secretary of State, with input from the Secretary of the Treasury and experts, must report to Congress on how U.S. sanctions affect Iran. This report will explore various impacts, including changes to Iran's problematic activities, key officials' finances, independent civil society operations, and the Iranian people's standard of living, while also identifying industries that remain unaffected by these sanctions.