Overview

Title

To improve the cybersecurity of the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make computers and data safer for the U.S. Government by checking for problems regularly, creating new rules, and teaching more people how to protect information.

Summary AI

The bill S. 2251, known as the "Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2023," aims to strengthen the cybersecurity of the U.S. Federal Government. It outlines guidelines to improve information security practices, mandates regular cyber risk assessments, and calls for the development of strategies to protect sensitive data. The bill also includes provisions to establish a Federal Chief Information Security Officer and promote the use of zero trust architecture. Additionally, it seeks to enhance the cybersecurity workforce in rural hospitals by developing educational resources and partnerships.

Published

2024-12-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-12-09
Package ID: BILLS-118s2251rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
70
Words:
53,031
Pages:
262
Sentences:
681

Language

Nouns: 14,973
Verbs: 3,634
Adjectives: 1,816
Adverbs: 418
Numbers: 2,313
Entities: 2,352

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.22
Average Sentence Length:
77.87
Token Entropy:
5.32
Readability (ARI):
40.64

AnalysisAI

The bill currently under discussion is aimed at enhancing the cybersecurity framework within the Federal Government. Officially titled the "Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2023," this comprehensive piece of legislation seeks to overhaul various aspects of cybersecurity policy and practice across federal agencies. The bill introduces new requirements and changes to existing laws, focusing on areas such as incident reporting, penetration testing, and the deployment of zero trust architecture. Additionally, the legislation seeks to bolster cybersecurity capabilities in rural hospitals while ensuring that no additional funds will be appropriated for this specific endeavor.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the significant concerns with this bill is its reliance on technical definitions that reference external documents, particularly concerning the concept of "zero trust architecture." This reliance could pose a challenge for interpretation, as these documents may not be easily accessible or comprehensible to all stakeholders involved. Furthermore, the bill outlines timelines for implementing crucial cybersecurity measures that range from one to ten years. This extensive timeframe could potentially delay necessary improvements and diminish the urgency required to address cybersecurity threats promptly.

Moreover, the bill grants broad discretion in defining what constitutes a "major incident," using subjective criteria like the likelihood of harm. This discretion may lead to inconsistent applications across federal agencies and potentially allow for misuse or underreporting of incidents that need attention. There is also room for exemptions, particularly for national security systems, which could create loopholes where certain systems escape crucial cybersecurity requirements.

The coordination among various governmental offices is emphasized, yet the bill lacks clear delineation of authority, which could lead to inefficiencies and administrative obstacles. The absence of explicit budgetary provisions for many initiatives, like the implementation of zero trust architecture, further raises concerns on the financial feasibility of the proposed measures. The complexity and dense legal references within the bill could impede understanding and meaningful engagement by the general public, potentially reducing transparency.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The bill is poised to impact the general public by aiming to create a safer and more secure federal information infrastructure. By establishing rigorous cybersecurity standards, it seeks to protect personal data that citizens share with federal agencies. However, the allowance for delayed notifications in the event of data breaches could undermine public trust, as individuals might not be informed promptly about potential threats to their personal information.

For specific stakeholders like federal agencies, the bill carries both opportunities and challenges. Agencies stand to benefit from a stronger cybersecurity framework, potentially reducing their vulnerability to cyber attacks. However, the increased reporting requirements and potential for administrative burdens may strain resources, particularly in understaffed or underfunded departments. The ambiguous definitions and broad criteria could also lead to uncertainty in compliance and application.

Rural hospitals will also experience a direct impact, as the bill emphasizes improving cybersecurity workforce capabilities in these healthcare settings. While this focus could lead to better safeguarding of sensitive health data, the commitment to not providing additional funds for these activities could limit the potential benefits, especially in resource-constrained environments. Thus, the efficacy of this initiative could be dampened by financial constraints.

Overall, while the bill presents a comprehensive approach to federal cybersecurity, the challenges in interpretation, implementation, and funding must be carefully managed to ensure it achieves its intended benefits without imposing undue burdens on the agencies and stakeholders it aims to support.

Issues

  • The bill's reliance on technical definitions that reference external documents and publications, particularly the definition of 'zero trust architecture' in Special Publication 800–207 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, is concerning as these documents may not be easily accessible or understandable to all readers, risking misinterpretation. (Sec. 2, Sec. 102)

  • The timelines for implementing key cybersecurity measures, such as updating guidance and reports spanning between one and ten years, may delay necessary improvements and reduce the urgency of cybersecurity enhancements. This includes updates for zero trust architecture and automation (Sec. 13, Sec. 114, Sec. 6)

  • The allowance for broad discretion and subjective criteria in defining a 'major incident', which involves terms like 'likely to result in demonstrable harm', might lead to inconsistencies across agencies and potential misuse. This guidance is crucial for consistent incident management and national security. (Sec. 3598)

  • The bill allows for exemptions and exceptions, particularly concerning national security systems, which might lead to exclusion from certain cybersecurity requirements. This could create loopholes and security gaps, particularly if certain systems are classified as national security without clear guidelines. (Sec. 4, Sec. 111, Sec. 118)

  • The integration and coordination among multiple directors and offices, such as the Office of the National Cyber Director and the Office of Management and Budget, without clear delineation of authority, may lead to operational inefficiencies and administrative delays. (Sec. 19, Sec. 106)

  • The absence of explicit budget or resources allocation for many initiatives, including training and the implementation of zero trust architectures, raises concerns regarding the financial feasibility and potential unfunded mandates, affecting its execution and impact. (Sec. 13, Sec. 3596)

  • The complex language and dense references to external statutes and legal documents throughout the bill could make it challenging for individuals without legal or technical backgrounds to understand and engage with the legislative content, possibly reducing public transparency and participation. (Sec. 2, Sec. 111, Sec. 112)

  • Provisions allowing for delayed notifications, both to Congress and affected individuals in the event of a data breach, potentially undermine transparency and could delay necessary responses, impacting public trust and individual security. (Sec. 3592)

  • The bill involves extensive amendments and restructuring across various sections, but lacks clarity in how these changes integrate with existing legal and cybersecurity frameworks, creating potential confusion over the practical application and enforcement. (Sec. 3, Sec. 104)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the "Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2023" outlines the official short title of the law and provides a detailed table of contents, listing various sections that address amendments to existing laws, introduce new cybersecurity measures, and outline responsibilities for federal agencies to enhance information security and transparency.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines several terms used in the Act, including "agency," "appropriately congressional committees," "awardee," "contractor," "director," "federal information system," "incident," "national security system," "penetration test," "threat hunting," and "zero trust architecture," each referring to specific meanings or sections of the United States Code or publications by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

3. Amendments to title 44 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to title 44 aim to enhance federal cybersecurity by establishing responsibilities for various agencies, promoting the use of secure automated processes, and reinforcing the roles of Chief Privacy Officers. They also introduce new definitions related to cybersecurity, require timely notifications of breaches, and emphasize collaboration between federal agencies to safeguard sensitive information and respond effectively to cybersecurity incidents.

3591. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, several definitions related to cybersecurity and governmental processes are provided. It outlines key terms like "appropriate reporting entities," "awardee," "breach," "contractor," "Federal information," "Federal information system," "intelligence community," "nationwide consumer reporting agency," and "vulnerability disclosure," giving clear descriptions of each role or concept.

3592. Notification of breach Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the process for notifying individuals when their personal information may be affected by a data breach involving a federal agency. It specifies when and how notifications should be sent, what information must be included, the potential for delaying notifications for reasons like national security, and the requirements for reporting breaches to Congress.

3593. Congressional and Executive Branch reports on major incidents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section outlines the procedures for federal agencies to report major incidents, which can affect national security, to Congress. It requires prompt notifications and updates to specified congressional leaders and committees, including details on how the incident happened, potential impacts, and actions taken, while ensuring sensitive information is properly handled and recommending consistent reporting formats.

3594. Government information sharing and incident response Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires federal agencies to share information about cybersecurity incidents with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and other relevant bodies, in order to improve incident response and prevent future threats. It also outlines the specific details that must be included in these reports and mandates using automated methods for information sharing, while exempting national security systems from some requirements to ensure sensitive data is protected.

3595. Responsibilities of contractors and awardees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Contractors and awardees working for government agencies must report security incidents or vulnerabilities related to Federal information systems to the appropriate agency and possibly the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. They have specific timelines for reporting, and guidance will be issued on what vulnerabilities need reporting. There are regulations to be implemented to enforce these reporting requirements, with exemptions for incidents on national security systems.

3596. Training Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirements for cybersecurity training of individuals who access federal information systems, defining these "covered individuals" as federal employees, contractors, and others. It mandates developing best practices for incident response and specifies training obligations for agencies, including integrating cybersecurity training into existing annual programs.

3597. Analysis and report on Federal incidents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to analyze federal cybersecurity incidents and share insights to improve risk understanding and security efforts across agencies. It mandates annual reports on these incidents, which are often made public unless they contain sensitive national security information, and also includes guidelines on handling information related to national security systems.

3598. Major incident definition Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director, along with the National Cyber Director, to create guidelines defining what constitutes a "major incident" within a year, focusing on incidents that could harm U.S. national security, disrupt critical services, or expose sensitive information. The guidelines allow the National Cyber Director to declare a major incident, especially if it affects multiple agencies due to common vulnerabilities or threats, and specify that simply discovering a vulnerability doesn't count as a major incident unless it affects privacy or security. The Director must evaluate and update these guidelines regularly and report to Congress on changes and their reasoning.

4. Amendments to subtitle III of title 40 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines amendments to various parts of title 40 in the U.S. Code, focusing on improving the security of government technology systems. It requires agencies to consider cybersecurity in their proposals, includes new definitions for terms like "high value asset," and updates responsibilities related to cybersecurity risk management involving the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

5. Actions to enhance Federal incident transparency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines responsibilities for enhancing federal incident transparency, requiring the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to develop a plan and brief Congress on the plan within specific timelines. It also tasks the Office of Management and Budget with updating guidance on incident data sharing and contractor responsibilities, and modifies the Privacy Act of 1974 for inter-agency data sharing related to incident response.

6. Additional guidance to agencies on FISMA updates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director to give updated guidelines within a year for agencies on two things: continuously assessing system risks and securely sharing the status of remedial actions for important assets using automated, easily readable data. Agencies must also work with their inspector generals to ensure everyone understands these policies.

7. Agency requirements to notify private sector entities impacted by incidents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirements for government agencies to notify certain private or government organizations, known as "reporting entities," about incidents that might affect their sensitive information. The Director must create guidance within a year of the act being passed, ensuring agencies inform affected entities if there's a substantial impact on confidentiality or integrity of their submitted information or related systems.

8. Mobile security briefings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director to brief relevant congressional committees on how government agencies are complying with the No TikTok on Government Devices Act within 180 days. The Director must also provide a list of agency exceptions to this act, with a possible classified annex, and offer a follow-up briefing after one year about any non-compliant agencies and update the exception list as needed.

9. Data and logging retention for incident response Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines a requirement for the Director to update guidelines for government agencies on how to handle and share logging data within two years. Additionally, the Secretary of Defense must create guidance for National Security Systems that meets or exceeds these standards.

10. CISA agency liaisons Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that within 120 days of the bill's enactment, the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) must assign at least one cybersecurity professional as a liaison to each agency's Chief Information Security Officer. These liaisons must be well-versed in cybersecurity threats, risk assessments, and federal initiatives, and they are to assist in incident response, offer advice, and coordinate support without duplicating efforts. Liaisons cannot be contractors but may serve multiple agencies, and this directive does not limit CISA's support role.

11. Federal penetration testing policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill introduces a new section to the United States Code requiring federal agencies to carry out penetration testing on their information systems to enhance cybersecurity, with guidance provided by relevant authorities like the Director of Cybersecurity. It permits the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct such testing without agency consent, after notifying the agency head, while certain systems related to national security are exempt from this requirement.

3559A. Federal penetration testing Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that federal agencies perform cybersecurity tests on their information systems and provides guidelines on how to use the results to enhance security. It excludes systems related to national security and delegates authority to the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence for certain systems.

12. Vulnerability disclosure policies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes federal policies for vulnerability disclosure, aiming to allow the public to report vulnerabilities in federal systems. It outlines the roles of various agencies, requirements for developing policies, and exemptions to ensure national security is not compromised.

3559B. Federal vulnerability disclosure policies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes Federal policies for vulnerability disclosures, aiming to facilitate communication between the public and agencies about security issues in government information systems. It directs agencies to implement a public vulnerability disclosure policy, sets guidelines for security researchers to report vulnerabilities without facing legal action, and clarifies responsibilities for various agencies, including avoiding the disclosure of sensitive information that could affect national security or law enforcement.

13. Implementing zero trust architecture Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines requirements for government agencies to adopt a "zero trust" approach to cybersecurity, which assumes breaches could happen at any time and requires strict internal defenses. It mandates regular briefings and progress reports over a ten-year period to monitor how agencies are improving security, minimizing access privileges, and preventing cyber incidents, with specific updates for systems related to national security.

14. Automation and artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the bill outlines the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing the cybersecurity of government information systems. It requires guidance from the Director on its use, mandates annual reports to Congress for five years, and tasks the Comptroller General with reporting on potential privacy risks and conducting a study on automation in federal cybersecurity.

15. Extension of chief data officer council Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section extends the duration of the chief data officer council by amending an existing rule, changing the expiration date from a specific event-based timeline to December 31, 2031.

16. Council of the inspectors general on integrity and efficiency dashboard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends part of United States Code to include a requirement for a dashboard displaying open information security recommendations, based on independent evaluations. It clarifies that this section does not mandate the publication of information that is exempt from disclosure under certain laws.

17. Security operations center shared service Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to brief certain congressional committees about the capabilities and future plans for centralized security operations that can support multiple agencies. Additionally, the Comptroller General must report on best practices and provide recommendations to improve the effectiveness of these security operations centers within 540 days.

18. Federal cybersecurity requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines new federal cybersecurity requirements that mandate agencies to protect sensitive data by implementing identity verification systems and forbids using certain Internet of things devices if they fail cybersecurity standards. Exceptions exist for the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies, and certifications exempting agencies from these requirements will last for four years, with possibilities for renewal.

19. Federal chief information security officer Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill establishes a Federal Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) who will serve within the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of the National Cyber Director. This officer, appointed by the President, will work alongside the Federal Chief Information Officer to oversee and implement federal cybersecurity initiatives and coordinate with the National Cyber Director on relevant projects.

3617. Federal chief information security officer Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the role of a Federal Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), who is appointed by the President and will serve in specific government offices. The CISO will help with federal cybersecurity initiatives and assist in overseeing electronic government projects, working closely with other cybersecurity officials.

20. Renaming office of the Federal Chief Information Officer Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill renames the "Office of Electronic Government" to the "Office of the Federal Chief Information Officer" and redesignates the title of the head from "Administrator" to "Federal Chief Information Officer" across various sections of the U.S. Code. It ensures that current references and roles are updated accordingly, allowing the incumbent Administrator to continue serving without needing a new appointment.

21. Rules of construction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the Act does not allow government agencies to take unauthorized actions beyond what the law permits, and it ensures that the Act cannot be used to violate constitutional rights, such as free speech or privacy.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Cybersecurity Act of 2023 provides an outline of its contents, including amendments to federal information security laws, measures to improve cybersecurity transparency, and guidance for agencies. The Act also addresses rural hospital cybersecurity, aiming to enhance workforce development and provide instructional resources without allocating extra funds.

101. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section identifies the official name of the title as the "Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2023."

102. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides definitions for various terms used throughout the bill, such as "agency," "appropriate congressional committees," "contractor," and "zero trust architecture." These definitions clarify what is meant by each term based on references to other legal texts or specified institutions like the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

103. Amendments to title 44 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to title 44 of the United States Code focus on enhancing information security and privacy policies for federal agencies. They establish more rigorous responsibilities for assessing cybersecurity risks, create roles like the Chief Privacy Officer, and implement guidelines to improve incident reporting, information sharing, and responses to cybersecurity threats and breaches.

3591. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, several definitions related to cybersecurity and governmental processes are provided. It outlines key terms like "appropriate reporting entities," "awardee," "breach," "contractor," "Federal information," "Federal information system," "intelligence community," "nationwide consumer reporting agency," and "vulnerability disclosure," giving clear descriptions of each role or concept.

3592. Notification of breach Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the process for notifying individuals when their personal information may be affected by a data breach involving a federal agency. It specifies when and how notifications should be sent, what information must be included, the potential for delaying notifications for reasons like national security, and the requirements for reporting breaches to Congress.

3593. Congressional and Executive Branch reports on major incidents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section outlines the procedures for federal agencies to report major incidents, which can affect national security, to Congress. It requires prompt notifications and updates to specified congressional leaders and committees, including details on how the incident happened, potential impacts, and actions taken, while ensuring sensitive information is properly handled and recommending consistent reporting formats.

3594. Government information sharing and incident response Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires federal agencies to share information about cybersecurity incidents with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and other relevant bodies, in order to improve incident response and prevent future threats. It also outlines the specific details that must be included in these reports and mandates using automated methods for information sharing, while exempting national security systems from some requirements to ensure sensitive data is protected.

3595. Responsibilities of contractors and awardees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Contractors and awardees working for government agencies must report security incidents or vulnerabilities related to Federal information systems to the appropriate agency and possibly the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. They have specific timelines for reporting, and guidance will be issued on what vulnerabilities need reporting. There are regulations to be implemented to enforce these reporting requirements, with exemptions for incidents on national security systems.

3596. Training Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirements for cybersecurity training of individuals who access federal information systems, defining these "covered individuals" as federal employees, contractors, and others. It mandates developing best practices for incident response and specifies training obligations for agencies, including integrating cybersecurity training into existing annual programs.

3597. Analysis and report on Federal incidents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to analyze federal cybersecurity incidents and share insights to improve risk understanding and security efforts across agencies. It mandates annual reports on these incidents, which are often made public unless they contain sensitive national security information, and also includes guidelines on handling information related to national security systems.

3598. Major incident definition Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director, along with the National Cyber Director, to create guidelines defining what constitutes a "major incident" within a year, focusing on incidents that could harm U.S. national security, disrupt critical services, or expose sensitive information. The guidelines allow the National Cyber Director to declare a major incident, especially if it affects multiple agencies due to common vulnerabilities or threats, and specify that simply discovering a vulnerability doesn't count as a major incident unless it affects privacy or security. The Director must evaluate and update these guidelines regularly and report to Congress on changes and their reasoning.

104. Amendments to subtitle III of title 40 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to subtitle III of title 40 propose changes to improve government technology management, emphasizing enhanced cybersecurity for high value assets and efficient use of resources. This includes revising definitions, incorporating cybersecurity considerations, evaluating proposals against security criteria, and refining roles for agencies like the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

105. Actions to enhance Federal incident transparency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the responsibilities of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the Office of Management and Budget to enhance transparency in handling federal incidents. It includes developing plans and guidance for data sharing and automation, updating regulations, and amending the Privacy Act of 1974 to facilitate improved incident response and reporting.

106. Additional guidance to agencies on FISMA updates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires that within one year, the Director must issue guidance to agencies for ongoing risk assessments and secure methods for reporting the status of important assets using automated tools. It also requires agency heads to work with their inspectors general to ensure clear understanding of policies for evaluations.

107. Agency requirements to notify private sector entities impacted by incidents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that government agencies must notify private or government organizations, known as "reporting entities," if an incident could greatly impact the confidentiality or integrity of sensitive information they submitted. Within a year of the Act's passing, the Director must create guidelines for agencies to follow in notifying these entities and potentially coordinating with certain risk management agencies.

108. Mobile security briefings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the Director must brief the appropriate congressional committees about agencies' compliance with the No TikTok on Government Devices Act within 180 days, including any exceptions. A follow-up briefing is required one year later for agencies that were not compliant, along with an updated list of exceptions.

109. Data and logging retention for incident response Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines a requirement for the Director, in consultation with other cybersecurity officials, to update logging and data sharing guidance for agencies within two years. Additionally, the Secretary of Defense must create similar or stricter guidelines for National Security Systems.

110. CISA agency liaisons Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to assign cybersecurity experts to act as liaisons with government agencies. These liaisons will assist in cybersecurity matters, help with incident response, and ensure there is no overlap with other federal cybersecurity efforts.

111. Federal penetration testing policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill introduces a new rule, 3559A, to U.S. law where federal agencies must perform penetration testing on their information systems with guidance from the Director and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to enhance cybersecurity efforts. This rule does not apply to national security systems, and the Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to conduct such testing without consent from agencies, provided they notify the agency heads.

3559A. Federal penetration testing Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Director, in collaboration with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, must provide guidance for federal agencies to conduct penetration tests on their information systems, emphasizing high value assets, and develop policies for improving cybersecurity. It exempts national security systems from this guidance and delegates certain authorities to the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence.

112. Vulnerability disclosure policies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines the establishment of Federal Vulnerability Disclosure Policies to allow the public to report security weaknesses in government information systems. It also details the roles and responsibilities of various agencies, including the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, in facilitating this process and ensuring that vulnerability information is handled carefully and efficiently, with a focus on maintaining national security.

3559B. Federal vulnerability disclosure policies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes Federal policies for vulnerability disclosures, aiming to facilitate communication between the public and agencies about security issues in government information systems. It directs agencies to implement a public vulnerability disclosure policy, sets guidelines for security researchers to report vulnerabilities without facing legal action, and clarifies responsibilities for various agencies, including avoiding the disclosure of sensitive information that could affect national security or law enforcement.

113. Implementing zero trust architecture Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill requires the Director and the Secretary of Defense to provide briefings and progress reports to various congressional committees about the implementation of a "zero trust architecture" in both agency systems and national security systems. This approach focuses on assuming systems are compromised and increasing security measures accordingly, with updates continuing for a period of up to ten years after the enactment of the law.

114. Automation and artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the Director is tasked with providing guidance on using artificial intelligence to improve the cybersecurity of information systems. The Comptroller General is also required to report on the privacy risks and cybersecurity issues related to the federal use of AI, and to study how automation, including AI, is used for cybersecurity across the federal government.

115. Extension of chief data officer council Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill changes the timeframe for the expiration of the Chief Data Officer Council, so it will now end on December 31, 2031, instead of ending two years after a specific report is submitted to Congress.

116. Council of the inspectors general on integrity and efficiency dashboard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends existing law to require a dashboard that displays open information security recommendations according to evaluations required by another law. It clarifies that it doesn't mandate publishing any information that is exempt from disclosure under a specific code.

117. Security operations center shared service Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to brief Congress on the current and future capabilities of shared security operations centers for federal agencies, including their integration with threat hunting and vulnerability management. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office must report on best practices and provide recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of these operations centers.

118. Federal cybersecurity requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the bill updates cybersecurity requirements for federal agencies by making several changes, such as requiring agencies to secure sensitive data with access controls and encryption, implementing single sign-on systems, and prohibiting the use of certain Internet of Things (IoT) devices unless they meet security standards. It also establishes procedures for exemptions and certifications, which expire in four years, and outlines specific exceptions for the Department of Defense and national security systems.

119. Federal chief information security officer Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the position of a Federal Chief Information Security Officer, who will work in both the Office of the Federal Chief Information Officer and the Office of the National Cyber Director, and will be appointed by the President. This person will assist in overseeing federal cybersecurity efforts, coordinate with relevant offices, and the current officer can continue in the role without a new appointment after the law is enacted.

3617. Federal chief information security officer Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the role of a Federal Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), who is appointed by the President and will serve in specific government offices. The CISO will help with federal cybersecurity initiatives and assist in overseeing electronic government projects, working closely with other cybersecurity officials.

120. Renaming office of the Federal Chief Information Officer Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill renames the "Office of Electronic Government" to the "Office of the Federal Chief Information Officer" across various sections of the United States Code. It updates the titles and references associated with the office's leader from "Administrator" to "Federal Chief Information Officer," ensuring alignment with the new designation.

121. Rules of construction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies that nothing in the title or its amendments allows an agency to take unauthorized actions, violate constitutional rights such as free speech and privacy, or permit unauthorized access to personal data.

201. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section gives the official name of this title as the “Rural Hospital Cybersecurity Enhancement Act.”

202. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the bill provides definitions for terms used in the document, including what is meant by "agency," "appropriate committees of Congress," "Director," "geographic division," "rural hospital," and "Secretary." For example, "agency" is defined by existing law, "appropriate committees of Congress" refers to specific committees in the Senate and House, and a "rural hospital" is a healthcare facility in a non-urban area offering various healthcare services.

203. Rural hospital cybersecurity workforce development strategy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary to develop a plan for increasing the number of cybersecurity professionals in rural hospitals, in collaboration with various agencies and healthcare providers. This plan will focus on partnerships, education, and training, and the Secretary must report progress annually to Congress.

204. Instructional materials for rural hospitals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Director to provide instructional materials for rural hospitals to help train their staff on basic cybersecurity practices. Within a year of the bill's enactment, this includes collaborating with experts, adapting or creating materials, and promoting these resources through an awareness campaign.

205. No additional funds Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no extra money will be allowed to be allocated for the activities under this title.