Overview
Title
An Act To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to clarify the scope of a major Federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 with respect to certain projects relating to the production of semiconductors, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Building Chips in America Act of 2023" is like updating the rules so it's easier and faster to build new factories for making computer chips, without needing to look too closely at how these factories might change the environment.
Summary AI
S. 2228, titled the “Building Chips in America Act of 2023,” amends a previous defense bill to clarify how environmental regulations apply to semiconductor manufacturing projects. The bill states that certain semiconductor projects receiving federal financial help will not be considered major federal actions under the National Environmental Policy Act if specific conditions are met, such as the project's initiation before the end of 2024 or if federal assistance is limited compared to the total project cost. It also establishes categories of projects that are exempt from detailed environmental assessments. Additionally, it allows the Department of Commerce to lead environmental reviews for these projects and to incorporate previous planning decisions in the review process.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Building Chips in America Act of 2023" is a legislative proposal aimed at refining aspects of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, particularly concerning projects related to semiconductor production. This bill seeks to clarify the procedures for environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) for these projects, which are vital for technological advancement and economic competitiveness in producing semiconductors.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill essentially outlines specific modifications on how environmental reviews are conducted for semiconductor-related projects backed by federal financial assistance. Notably, it exempts certain projects from being considered as major federal actions, thus bypassing the need for elaborate environmental assessments traditionally required under NEPA. It designates the Department of Commerce as the lead agency for such projects, enabling it to wield more control over their environmental evaluation processes. Additionally, the bill introduces categorical exclusions that permit semiconductor facilities or related undertakings to be exempt from detailed environmental evaluations under specific conditions.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the provisions of this bill. The exemption of certain semiconductor projects from NEPA reviews might lead to inadequate environmental scrutiny and reduced public engagement in decisions that could have substantial ecological impacts. The implementation of categorical exclusions is particularly contentious; these exclusions could short-circuit the types of comprehensive environmental impact analyses usually expected for significant federal projects. There's also concern that reliance on prior planning decisions could utilize outdated or insufficiently adequate studies to navigate current environmental assessments, possibly undermining the quality of these evaluations.
Complex language and numerous cross-references within the legislation might also pose a challenge for stakeholders less familiar with the legal and regulatory landscape, leading to potential misinterpretations or misapplications. Furthermore, the criteria allowing financial assistance of less than 10% of a project's cost to bypass a NEPA review could disproportionately favor entities with substantial private financing, raising concerns about unequal distribution of federal support.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the bill may accelerate the initiation and completion of semiconductor projects by easing environmental review requirements, reflecting a significant push to boost the domestic semiconductor industry—a sector seen as critical for national security and economic prosperity. However, this could come at the cost of ensuring thorough environmental assessments, potentially risking unforeseen impacts on local ecosystems and communities.
Specific stakeholders, including project developers and associated businesses, could benefit from streamlined regulatory processes and potentially reduced project timelines, which may lower costs and increase competitiveness. On the other hand, environmental groups and community organizations may view these regulatory rollbacks as undermining vital environmental protections, positing that they could result in adverse long-term effects on natural resources and public health.
In conclusion, while the "Building Chips in America Act of 2023" aims to enhance the U.S. semiconductor sector, this legislative endeavor necessitates balancing expeditious economic advancement with the requisite environmental stewardship and equity in federal support distribution.
Issues
The exemption of certain semiconductor projects from being classified as major Federal actions under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) in Section 2 could lead to inadequate environmental oversight. By allowing Federal financial assistance projects that meet certain criteria to bypass NEPA review, the provision may reduce transparency and public input in environmentally significant projects.
The use of categorical exclusions as outlined in Section 2 raises concerns about potentially bypassing detailed environmental assessments. Broad or indiscriminate application of these exclusions could lead to insufficient environmental analysis of projects, which might lead to unforeseen environmental impacts.
The language in Section 2 regarding the reliance on prior planning decisions for environmental reviews suggests that outdated or insufficiently rigorous studies could be used, potentially compromising the quality of environmental assessments.
The complex and dense language along with multiple cross-references in Section 2, which includes references to various existing regulations, may be difficult for non-experts to interpret, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misapplications of the law.
The provision in Section 2 for Federal financial assistance to cover up to 10% of a project's cost without a NEPA review might result in uneven distribution of funds, favoring entities capable of securing additional private investments, which could raise issues of fairness and equitable distribution of government support.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section gives the official name of the law as the “Building Chips in America Act of 2023.”
2. Semiconductor program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act to introduce rules about environmental reviews for semiconductor projects. Key changes include letting certain projects avoid being classified as major federal actions under environmental laws, establishing the Department of Commerce as the lead agency for these projects, and allowing reliance on previous studies for environmental reviews.