Overview

Title

To release from wilderness study area designation certain land in the State of Montana, to improve the management of that land, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 2216 is a plan that wants to change how three special outdoor places in Montana are looked after. Some people think if these places are not called "wilderness study areas" anymore, it could make it easier for people to visit, help animals, and keep forests safe from big fires.

Summary AI

S. 2216 aims to change the status of certain public lands in Montana that were previously designated as wilderness study areas. The bill seeks to remove this designation from the Middle Fork Judith, Hoodoo Mountain, and Wales Creek areas because they have been found unsuitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. This change would allow for improved management of the land, enhance access for hunters and the public, and support wildlife and wildfire management efforts.

Published

2024-01-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-01-09
Package ID: BILLS-118s2216rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,400
Pages:
8
Sentences:
18

Language

Nouns: 504
Verbs: 73
Adjectives: 43
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 103
Entities: 120

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.32
Average Sentence Length:
77.78
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
41.39

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act," seeks to change the classification of specific public lands in Montana. Originally designated as wilderness study areas, these lands were temporarily protected to assess their suitability for permanent wilderness status. However, studies conducted by the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management concluded that a significant portion of these lands is unsuitable for such designation. This bill aims to remove the wilderness study area status from these lands, namely the Middle Fork Judith, Hoodoo Mountain, and Wales Creek Wilderness Study Areas, to allow for more effective land management in line with current plans.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several notable issues. Firstly, it lacks detailed justification or evidence for how removing the wilderness designation will improve land management, leading to concerns about transparency and accountability. The absence of specific future management goals also leads to potential ambiguity. Additionally, the bill does not address potential environmental impacts or provide a timeline for when new management measures will be implemented. Finally, there is insufficient information about public and stakeholder engagement in shaping the new management plans.

Public Impact

The bill could have broad implications for Montana's public lands and the people who use them. By releasing land from the wilderness study designation, the bill proposes to improve land management, potentially allowing for increased recreational access, such as hunting and hiking, as well as conservation projects like wildfire mitigation. These changes might enhance enjoyment and use for the general public, particularly outdoors enthusiasts.

However, the lack of detailed management plans and timelines could create confusion and uncertainty about how these lands will be used and preserved in the future. The absence of transparency about how decisions will be made could reduce public trust in the management process.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders directly affected by this bill include local communities, conservation groups, and recreational users. Local communities could benefit from increased access and recreational opportunities, potentially boosting local economies through tourism and related activities. However, without clear management strategies, there could be negative impacts, such as environmental degradation or conflicts over land use.

For conservation groups, the removal of wilderness study area status may raise concerns about the potential loss of biodiversity protection and preservation efforts. Conversely, these groups could see an opportunity to engage in collaborative management processes if the bill allows for stakeholder input.

Recreational users and sportsmen may view the bill positively due to the potential for enhanced access and additional activities. Yet, without detailed plans, these users might worry about the long-term sustainability of the land and its resources.

In summary, while the Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act seeks to modernize land management, it raises questions about transparency, environmental impacts, and stakeholder involvement. These issues will need careful consideration to ensure that changes benefit all parties involved.

Issues

  • The lack of specificity and potential transparency concerns, as the bill does not provide detailed justifications or evidence for how removing the wilderness designation improves land management (Sections 2, 3).

  • The bill does not specify the future management goals for areas once they are no longer subject to previous legislation, leading to potential management ambiguity (Section 2, Section 3).

  • Concerns about stakeholder engagement and public involvement, as the bill lacks information on public feedback in the new management plans (Section 2, Section 3).

  • Absence of specific land areas being referred to as 'certain wilderness study areas,' which could create ambiguity and confusion (Section 3).

  • The timeline for the adoption and implementation of new management plans is unspecified, which causes uncertainty about when the changes will take effect (Section 2, Section 3).

  • Potential environmental impact concerns, as there are no mentions of assessments related to the management status change of previously designated wilderness study areas (Section 2, Section 3).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act states that it may be referred to as the "Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act".

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has identified that certain areas in Montana, set aside as wilderness study areas under both the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, have been deemed unsuitable for wilderness designation by the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, but remain classified as such until Congress acts. Removing this designation will allow for better land management, improved public access, and enhanced conservation efforts, guided by plans developed with local input and scientific assessments.

3. Release and improved management of land comprising certain wilderness study areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines measures for the release and better management of land that is currently classified as wilderness study areas.

2. Release and improved management of land comprising certain wilderness study areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Middle Fork Judith Wilderness Study Area, along with the Hoodoo Mountain and Wales Creek Wilderness Study Areas, will no longer be governed by previous wilderness study area protections. Instead, these lands will be managed according to the most recent land management plans specified under applicable federal laws.