Overview
Title
To extend the customs waters of the United States from 12 nautical miles to 24 nautical miles from the baselines of the United States, consistent with Presidential Proclamation 7219.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to change the rules about how far out into the ocean the United States can check ships and make sure they're not breaking any U.S. laws, moving from 12 miles to 24 miles. This means that people in boats will have to follow U.S. rules even when they're a bit farther from the shore.
Summary AI
S. 221 seeks to expand the customs waters of the United States from 12 nautical miles to 24 nautical miles, as outlined in Presidential Proclamation 7219. The bill highlights the need for this expansion due to advancements in maritime technology, which have increased the speed and performance of vessels, making it harder to enforce U.S. laws with the current 12-mile limit. The proposed change aims to enhance U.S. law enforcement and public health by allowing authorities more time and space to interdict vessels that may be violating U.S. laws. Additionally, amendments to the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Anti-Smuggling Act will align definitions with the proposed expansion of customs waters.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The United States Senate has introduced a bill titled S. 221, aiming to expand the customs waters of the United States. This proposal intends to extend the geographic area where U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) can enforce laws, moving from 12 nautical miles to 24 nautical miles from the baseline of the country's coastlines. This expansion aligns with Presidential Proclamation 7219, signed in 1999, which previously extended the contiguous zone from 12 to 24 nautical miles. The bill argues that this change will enhance law enforcement's ability to intercept modern, fast-moving vessels that might be involved in illegal activities.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the use of ambiguous terms, such as "reasonable grounds" and "hot pursuit," which could lead to varying interpretations and possible legal challenges. These terms describe the conditions under which U.S. authorities can take action against vessels suspected of violating laws.
Additionally, the bill does not address any financial implications associated with expanding the customs waters. This omission may be concerning because extending jurisdiction could incur additional costs for enforcing agencies like CBP, potentially impacting taxpayers.
Moreover, there is a lack of specificity in the bill regarding how the extension of the customs waters effectively addresses modern threats. Without clear explanations and strategies for enforcement, questions arise about the necessity and effectiveness of such an extension.
The technical and legal language used in the bill, referring to specific U.S. legal codes and Presidential Proclamations, may confuse the general public, thereby limiting transparency and understanding of the bill's impact.
Lastly, the rationale for extending customs waters might lack the detail needed to garner public and political support, especially concerning providing law enforcement with more time to act against threats.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, this bill's potential impact on the public might include enhanced safety and security, particularly in coastal areas. By extending the reach of CBP, the government aims to more effectively detect and prevent illegal activities such as smuggling, thus safeguarding against potential risks. However, the lack of financial detail might raise concerns about taxpayer expense if expanded operations require significant additional resources.
Impact on Stakeholders
Law Enforcement Agencies: Positively, agencies like CBP could benefit from extended operational reach, allowing them more time and resources to address maritime threats. However, they may also face challenges, such as increased logistical demands and resource allocation without assured funding.
Coastal Communities: Residents near coastal areas might experience improved security due to a more assertive law enforcement presence. On the downside, a shortage of specifics in the bill could lead to uncertainties or inefficiencies in enforcement actions.
Legal and Policy Analysts: The complex language used might present challenges for those tasked with analyzing or implementing the bill. Misinterpretation of ambiguous terms could lead to inconsistency in enforcement and possible legal disputes.
The bill sets out to fortify U.S. coastal defenses through expanded maritime jurisdiction. While aiming for increased security, it concurrently raises questions about execution specifics and operational costs, calling for a balanced dialogue among lawmakers, enforcement agencies, and the public to refine and address outstanding concerns.
Issues
The use of ambiguous terms such as 'reasonable grounds' and 'hot pursuit' in Section 2 can lead to inconsistent application and enforcement, potentially resulting in varied interpretations and legal challenges.
The legislation in Section 3 does not address any financial implications, but expanding the definitions and jurisdictions could have budgetary effects that remain unspecified, which might raise concerns about unanticipated costs to taxpayers.
Section 2 lacks specificity regarding how extending the customs waters will effectively address modern threats, particularly in terms of the required enforcement actions and capabilities, raising questions about the overall effectiveness and necessity of the extension.
The complex and technical language, especially in Section 3, containing legal references to Presidential Proclamations and U.S. Code sections, may be difficult for the general public to comprehend, limiting transparency and public understanding of the bill's impact.
The rationale for extending the customs waters in Section 2 might be seen as lacking specificity, particularly about how much additional time is required for law enforcement to be effective, potentially undermining public and political support.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this Act can be referred to as the “Extending Limits of United States Customs Waters Act of 2025.”
2. Findings; sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that the United States extended its territorial and contiguous zones based on international law, allowing it to enforce its laws further out to sea. Furthermore, Congress believes expanding the authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection from 12 to 24 nautical miles will enhance law enforcement and public health by giving agents more time to intercept vessels.
3. Extension of customs waters of the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the definitions in the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Anti-Smuggling Act to expand the customs waters of the United States, specifying that they include the territorial sea and contiguous zone as allowed by international law, based on Presidential proclamations from 1988 and 1999. The changes will take effect the day after the law is enacted.