Overview
Title
To amend the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to improve the administration of the Marine Debris Foundation, to amend the Marine Debris Act to improve the administration of the Marine Debris Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is about making changes to help keep our oceans clean from trash by making some rules better and giving money to a group that helps with this. It also tries to work more with Native American communities to take care of the oceans together.
Summary AI
The bill, S. 216, seeks to amend the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act and the Marine Debris Act to enhance the administration of marine debris initiatives. It reallocates certain sections of existing laws and introduces changes to the structure and management of the Marine Debris Foundation, including authorizing funding and defining roles. The bill also emphasizes collaboration with Indian Tribes and Tribal Governments by implementing best practices for outreach and support. Additionally, it clarifies definitions related to marine debris management and adjusts existing legislative references to align with these amendments.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act" seeks to amend existing legislation, namely the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act and the Marine Debris Act, in order to enhance the administration of programs and foundations related to marine debris. Introduced to the Senate in January 2025, this Act aims to streamline processes within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Marine Debris Foundation. The bill involves modifications to definitions, funding allocations, the structure of the Marine Debris Foundation, and how grants and agreements are administered.
General Summary of Significant Issues
In-Kind Contributions: The bill allows for in-kind contributions by the Under Secretary without a clear definition, leaving room for ambiguity. This lack of clarity could potentially lead to favoritism or biased decision-making in project funding and implementation.
Principal Office Location: The decision on the location of the Marine Debris Foundation's principal office is left largely open, which could lead to favoritism in selecting the location based on interests not explicitly detailed in the bill.
Engagement with Tribal Authorities: The bill highlights outreach to Indian Tribes but lacks specific methods or metrics for measuring the effectiveness of technical assistance, which could undermine trust and efficacy in these relationships.
Funding Justification: An authorization of $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 is noted without detailed justification, leading to concerns about oversight and potential wasteful spending.
Leadership Accountability: There is a lack of outlined performance metrics for the leadership roles within the Marine Debris Foundation, which might result in biased assessments and reduced accountability.
Complexity and Transparency: The legal and technical language used throughout the bill, such as the transfer and redesignation of sections, may contribute to confusion and a lack of transparency regarding legislative intentions and impacts.
Impact on the Public
The proposed amendments could impact the public in several ways. On a broad scale, the bill seems focused on improving the administration of marine debris-related programs, which could enhance efforts to protect ocean environments. This could benefit communities that rely on marine ecosystems for their livelihood, as well as improve natural environments that the general public enjoys.
However, the ambiguous language surrounding funding and administrative processes might lead to inefficiencies that reduce the overall effectiveness of the bill's aims. The lack of clear performance metrics and accountability for leadership roles within the Marine Debris Foundation could reduce public trust and confidence in these initiatives.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Environmental Organizations and Agencies: These stakeholders might view the bill as a positive step toward more structured and potentially more effective management of marine debris. However, without clear definitions and oversight, the execution might fall short of expectations.
Tribal Governments and Indian Tribes: The bill's provisions about outreach could be seen as a potential improvement in collaboration with Indian Tribes. Still, the lack of specific, measurable outcomes could lead to skepticism regarding the sincerity and effectiveness of these efforts.
Government Agencies: Agencies that coordinate with NOAA and the Marine Debris Foundation might experience changes in terms of administrative efficiency and resource allocation. The potential for favoritism or unclear guidelines could complicate partnerships or project planning.
In conclusion, while the "Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act" seeks to address issues related to marine debris, its effectiveness could be hindered by a lack of specificity and transparency in its proposed amendments. Clear definitions, oversight mechanisms, and justified funding could enhance the enactment and public perception of this legislation.
Financial Assessment
The bill S. 216 includes several references to financial allocations, particularly related to the Marine Debris Foundation. Here is an analysis of these financial aspects and their implications:
Financial Appropriations
The bill explicitly authorizes an appropriation of $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 to support the initiatives outlined in the Marine Debris Act. This appropriation is aimed at enhancing the functioning and administration of activities related to marine debris, which falls under the purview of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and related bodies.
Relation to Identified Issues
- Lack of Detailed Justification and Outcomes:
The bill authorizes a significant allocation of $2,000,000, yet it does not provide a detailed plan on how these funds will be employed or the expected outcomes. This lack of specificity raises concerns about potential mismanagement or inefficiencies in spending. Without detailed oversight or specified goals, there could be public skepticism regarding the effective use of these government funds.
Ambiguity in In-Kind Contributions:
- The bill allows the Under Secretary to make in-kind contributions for projects under certain agreements. However, it does not clearly define what constitutes an in-kind contribution, leading to potential ambiguities. This could result in bias or preferential treatment in project funding and execution, as decisions may lack transparency due to the absence of defined guidelines and criteria.
Need for Performance Metrics
The absence of performance metrics for reviewing leadership roles, particularly the Chief Executive Officer of the Marine Debris Foundation, is a significant concern. Effective financial oversight is critical, especially when public funds are involved. Performance metrics would ensure that the foundation's leadership is held accountable for achieving the intended objectives efficiently and effectively with the allocated funds. Without such metrics, there is a risk of biased assessment and diminished accountability, potentially leading to ineffective utilization of the $2,000,000 earmarked for fiscal year 2025.
Complexity and Transparency
The bill's complex legal language and frequent amendments can obscure the financial implications and intent behind these changes. Stakeholders and the public may find it challenging to navigate the numerous cross-references and amendments, leading to potential misunderstandings. By simplifying these references and providing clear justifications for the financial appropriations, the bill could enhance transparency and public trust in how government funds are being managed in the context of marine debris initiatives.
In summary, while the bill allocates funds towards marine debris management, the lack of detailed plans, performance metrics, and clear definitions raise concerns about the potential effectiveness and fairness of financial management under the proposed amendments.
Issues
The allowance for in-kind contributions by the Under Secretary without a clear definition in Section 2 ('Modifications to the marine debris program of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration') may lead to ambiguous interpretations and potential bias or favoritism in project funding and implementation.
The lack of specific criteria for selecting the principal office location of the Marine Debris Foundation in Section 3 ('Modifications to the marine debris foundation') could lead to decisions that favor certain interests without transparent reasoning.
The broad language regarding outreach and consultation with Indian Tribes and Tribal Governments in Section 3 might lead to inadequate methods for measuring the effectiveness of technical assistance and capacity building, which could result in general public distrust.
The authorization of $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 in Section 3 lacks detailed justification and specified outcomes, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending without oversight.
The absence of performance metrics for reviewing the Chief Executive Officer and other leadership roles of the Marine Debris Foundation in Section 3 may lead to biased assessments and lack of accountability.
Complex legal language and the transfer of sections without clear rationales or implications in Section 4 ('Transfers') might lead to misunderstandings and lack of transparency about legislative intent.
Frequent and numerous amendments, redesignations, and cross-references in Section 5 ('Definitions') contribute to the complexity of the bill which can confuse stakeholders and the general public, making it difficult to understand the intent and impact of the changes.
The modifications in Section 6 ('Conforming amendments') largely consist of technical language changes that may seem insignificant without context, which might obscure the true impact or necessity of these changes to the general public.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the Act will be known as the “Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act.”
2. Modifications to the marine debris program of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Marine Debris Act by renumbering some sections and updating how the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) can use contracts, grants, and agreements. It allows NOAA to contribute in-kind to projects based on the benefits they receive and expands the definitions to include other types of agreements.
3. Modifications to the marine debris foundation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The document details modifications to the Marine Debris Foundation, including changes to governance, the addition of best practices for engaging with Indian Tribes and Tribal Governments, and financial provisions. It outlines adjustments such as relocating certain sections, restructuring board appointment procedures, setting up best practices for outreach, and ensuring funding until 2029.
Money References
- “(i) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this Act may be construed— “(1) to satisfy any requirement for government-to-government consultation with Tribal Governments; or “(2) to affect or modify any treaty or other right of any Tribal Government.”. (h) Authorization of appropriations.—Section 118(a) of the Marine Debris Act (Public Law 109–449), as transferred by this Act, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting “and $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2025” after “through 2024”; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking “and State and local government agencies” and inserting “, State and local government agencies, regional organizations, Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, and foreign governments”.
4. Transfers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to existing laws by moving parts of the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to follow a specific section in the Marine Debris Act, and reordering sections of the Marine Debris Act itself, giving them new numbers and adding an introductory heading, "subtitle D—Administration," before these sections.
5. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the Marine Debris Act redefine and reorganize certain terms, such as "circular economy" and "Tribal Government," by referencing the definitions in other established acts like the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act. Additionally, they transfer specific sections from the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to the Marine Debris Act and make technical changes to how some phrases, like "non-Federal funds," are described.
6. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section from the bill makes several updates to the Marine Debris Act, including replacing references to the “Administrator” with “Under Secretary” or “EPA Administrator” and changing some section and subtitle references to reflect the new organization of the Act. It also updates the term “tribal government” to “Tribal Government” in the Act.